Full record / 25-002932.pdf

25-002932.pdf

Larry Todd Hunt, Petitioner V City Of Kentwood, Respondent · 25-002932-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

SEP 9 4 2025 

MICH 

AN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002632 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name 

MI, 

Last Name 

Luke 

T 

Freeman 

Malling Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

PO Box 8848 

City or Town 

State 

2IP Code 

Kentwood 

Mi 

[49518 

Telephone Number (6 1 6) 554-0724 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

freemanl@kentwood.us 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

1 

First Name 

ME 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any} 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes 

[mn] No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

OYes 

[No 

[8 NotApplicable

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

While conducting summer fieldwork for the 2025 tax year, adjustments regarding square 

footage (SF) were made to the garage and deck. A 49 SF shed & 192 SF patio were 

also added, and the patio was then later corrected to 100 SF at March Board of Review 

(MBOR). In addition to these adjustments and additions, sales information gathered via 

MLS indicated there was finished lower-level square footage that needed to be added to 

our database. Residential review forms were sent out in years 2013, 2018, and 2024 

requesting updated information on the property but none of these were returned to the 

City of Kentwood. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Ml Yes 

[No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [1 March 

[J duly 

[J December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner priar to the March BOR? [Hl] Yes 

(] No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [ml] Yes 

[I] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of 

a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [mn] Yes 

No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

(} Yes 

[Ano 

If so, what is the issue date?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? (| Yes 

No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [_] March 

[| July 

[] December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption ata BOR? [] Yes 

[4 No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March 

[] July 

[] December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[m] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information suse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

$167,900 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

$91,438 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

$335,854 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

$167,927 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Larry Todd Hunt 

; 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No.25-002932 

City of Kentwood 

; 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Luke Freeman 

states that on 09/19/2025 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Answer Form 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Larry Todd Hunt 

2025 52nd St SE 

Kentwood, MI 49508 

V4 aa— 

[Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

Luke T. Freeman 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy]

Page 5

City of Kentwood 

Kentwood, MI 43518 

Michigan Tax Tribunal

PO BOX 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909

PDF reading copy

← View full record