Full record / 24-004214 Extend ORI.pdf

24-004214 Extend ORI.pdf

John P Kauffman, Petitioner V Township Of Assyria, Respondent · 24-004214-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

John P Kauffman, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-004214 

 

Assyria Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

ORDER REQUIRING INFORMATION 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order 

holding Respondent in default on February 13, 2025, because Respondent failed to file 

an answer.1 Respondent was required to cure the default within 14 days. Respondent 

has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. 

Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, 

Respondent’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and 

Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify the scheduling 

of a default hearing for failure to timely comply with this Order.2 

 

The Tribunal further finds that Petitioner is appealing the denial of a qualified forest 

exemption for tax years 2022 and 2023. A party that seeks to claim the exemption must 

provide a copy of the recorded qualified forest school tax affidavit to the assessor by 

December 31.3 The affidavit must be approved by the Department of Agriculture and 

Rural Development.4 The pleadings and contentions attached to the petition are not 

clear as to whether Petitioner submitted a copy of the recorded qualified forest school 

tax affidavit and on what date or dates. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Respondent to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file an answer, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $25.00 fee 

required for the filing of the motion, and (4) file proof the motion and answer were 

served on Petitioner. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the 

entry of this Order.5 

 

1 The Order further stated: “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 MCL 211.7jj[1](7). 

4 MCL 211.7jj[1](4). 

5 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-004214 

Page 2 of 2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit information and documentation 

indicating whether it possessed a recorded qualified forest school tax affidavit and 

whether it submitted a copy of that affidavit to the assessor by December 31 of the tax 

years at issue. Petitioner shall submit the foregoing within 14 days of this Order. 

 

Respondent’s failure to comply with this Order may result in the scheduling of a default 

hearing, as provided by TTR 237(1).6 

 

Petitioner’s failure to comply with this Order will result in Petitioner being placed in 

default, as provided by TTR 237(1). 

 

 

Entered: April 25, 2025 

 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

cs/bw/am 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 

6 See also MCL 205.732.

PDF reading copy

← View full record