25-002823 Answer.pdf
Neal Bloomfield, Petitioner V Township Of Chikaming, Respondent · 25-002823-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002823 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Unit of Government Chikaming Township Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 13535 Red Arrow Hwy City or Town: State: 2iP Code: Harbert MI 149115 Telephone “mr 069-469- 1 676 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information ) First Name: M.L: Last Name: Antoinette Swisher Firm Name (if any): Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 13535 Red Arrow Hwy City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Harbert Sa Telephone "mr 69-469- 1 676 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): tswisher@chikamingtownship.org Section 3: Subject Property Information Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? Yes [J No [J NotApplicable Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? J ves No If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a separate sheet if necessary.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Assessed value was developed utilizing the cost approach to value with per unit land value determined by land value analysis. Economic Condition Factors were also applied. Property owner petitioned March Board of Review for a value that reflects 50% of the purchase price. The March Board denied the request for a lower value. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [¥ Yes [No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March (| July O December If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [0] Yes OO No If yes, cite the Board's authority. Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? O Yes No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? ves MAno If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? Section 6: Valuation Information suse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. FreT11-07-0009-0004-53-8 Classification of Property: ~~ Real Personal [J (check one) Agricultural [J Commercial [J Industrial (J Residential Timber-Cutover [1 ~~ Developmental [J Utility (J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: 410,100 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 820,200 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) 41 0, 1 00 assessed value) 41 0, 1 00 Signature required Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representatiye’s Signature: ND v Isl o JA