Full record / Petition - Moceri Bloomfield Hills (Dittrich).pdf

Petition - Moceri Bloomfield Hills (Dittrich).pdf

Moceri/Dm Investments, LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Bloomfield Hills Respondent · 26-001625-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

Petition Page 1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

Moceri/DM Investments, LLC, 

 

 

Docket No. 26- 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel Nos. 12-19-14-152-005 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12-19-14-152-007 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City of Bloomfield Hills, 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

Richard E Rassel, III (P57540) 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition 

 

 

Petitioner Moceri/DM Investments, LLC, by and through their attorneys, 

Williams Williams Rattner & Plunkett, PC, state as follows for their Entire Tribunal 

Property Tax Petition. 

The Parties 

1. 

Petitioner Moceri/DM Investments, LLC, is a Michigan limited liability 

company with its registered office located at 3005 University Dr, Auburn Hills, MI 

48326.

Page 2

Petition Page 2 

2. 

Respondent City of Bloomfield Hills is a Michigan city with its primary 

offices located at 45 E Long Lake Road, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304. 

The Subject Properties 

3. 

Petitioner owns properties identified as follows: 

Parcel No. 

Property Address 

12-19-14-152-005 

39515 Woodward Ave 

12-19-14-152-007 

39515 Woodward Ave 

 

They are referred to collectively in this Petition as the “Subject Properties.” 

4. 

The Subject Properties are located in Oakland County and are within 

the Bloomfield Hills school district. 

5. 

Respondent possesses jurisdiction to assess and collect property taxes 

for the Subject Properties. 

The 2026 Assessments 

6. 

For the 2026 tax year, Respondent classified the Subject Properties as 

commercial real property. 

7. 

For the 2026 tax year, Respondent established the Subject Properties’ 

assessments for property taxes in the amounts set forth in paragraph 1 of the 

attached Multiple Parcel Form. 

8. 

Petitioner contends that lawful assessments of the Subject Properties 

for the 2026 tax year cannot exceed the amounts set forth in paragraph 2 of the 

attached Multiple Parcel Form. 

9. 

The amounts in dispute therefore equal the amounts identified in 

paragraph 3 of the attached Multiple Parcel Form.

Page 3

Petition Page 3 

10. 

This Petition presents issues involving the Subject Properties’ valuation 

for assessment purposes. Petitioner does not believe that this Petition presents any 

issues arising out of “additions” or “losses” as the General Property Tax Act, MCL 

211.1 et seq. (the “GPTA”), defines those terms, but reserve its right to assert issues 

involving losses should information supporting such issues become available. 

11. 

The Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments (a) violate the Michigan 

Constitution, the GPTA, and other Michigan law, (b) are based on erroneous 

principles and information, (c) are based on the misapplication of valuation 

principles, and (d) otherwise violate Petitioner’s rights. 

12. 

Petitioner does not assert that the Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments 

are not uniform aside from the lack of uniformity resulting from Respondent 

overestimating the Subject Properties’ values. 

Conclusion and Request for Relief 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this honorable Tribunal 

enter judgment revising the Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments to amounts that do 

not exceed Petitioner’s contentions of value set forth in paragraph 2 of the attached 

Multiple Parcel Form and granting Petitioner all other relief to which it is entitled 

under Michigan law. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WILLIAMS WILLIAMS RATTNER 

 

 

 

 

 

& PLUNKETT PC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By: 

/s/ Jerome P. Pesick 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

Dated: May 27, 2026 

 

 

Attorneys for Petitioners

Page 4

Multiple Parcel Form Page 1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

Moceri/DM Investments, LLC, 

 

 

Docket No. 26- 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel Nos. 12-19-14-152-005 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12-19-14-152-007 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City of Bloomfield Hills, 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jerome P. Pesick (P29039) 

Richard E Rassel, III (P57540) 

Jason C. Long (P59244) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, PC 

380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entire Tribunal Petition Multiple Parcel Form 

 

 

1. 

The values established for the Subject Properties by Respondent’s 

March 2026 Board of Review are as follows: 

Parcel No. 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

12-19-14-152-005 

 1,333,260 

 666,630 

 664,410 

12-19-14-152-007 

 326,020 

 163,010 

 163,010 

Totals: 

 1,659,280 

 829,640 

 827,420 

 

 

2. 

Petitioner contends that lawful 2026 assessments for the Subject 

Properties cannot exceed the following amounts:

Page 5

Multiple Parcel Form Page 2 

Parcel No. 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

12-19-14-152-005 

 640,000 

 320,000 

 320,000 

12-19-14-152-007 

 160,000 

 80,000 

 80,000 

Totals: 

 800,000 

 400,000 

 400,000 

 

 

3. 

The amounts in dispute for the 2026 tax year are therefore as follows: 

Parcel No. 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

12-19-14-152-005 

 693,260 

 346,630 

 344,410 

12-19-14-152-007 

 166,020 

 83,010 

 83,010 

Totals: 

 859,280 

 429,640 

 427,420

PDF reading copy

← View full record