Full record / RECINELLA, LISA & FOX, SHAY 2024 MTT 24-003676 RESPONDENT ANSWER.pdf

RECINELLA, LISA & FOX, SHAY 2024 MTT 24-003676 RESPONDENT ANSWER.pdf

Shay Fox, Lisa Recinella, Petitioners V City Of St Joseph, Respondent · 24-003676-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003676 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government 

City OF St Joseph (BERRIEN), 

First Name 

ML 

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government 

Michele 

M 

Bennett 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

700 Broad St 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

St Joseph 

Michigan 

49085 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

269-983-1231 

269-985-0347 

E-mail Address 

mbennett@sjcity.com 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

MLL 

Last Name 

Michele 

M 

Bennett 

Firm Name (if any) 

St. Joseph City 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

700 Broad St 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

St. Joseph 

Michigan 

49085 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

2699831231 

269-985-0347 

E-mail Address 

mbennett@sjcity.com 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes 

‘Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, list which parcels adjoin onc another. 

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Respondent denies that Petitioner's contention of value is accurate or supportable. The 2024 assessed value and taxable value established by the City of St. Joseph is 

calculated using the Cost Approach Method and the use of Sales Studies Analysis for land and ECF calculations. 

The 2024 MBOR assessment was determined to 

be fair and equitable. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board's authority 

‘Was the assessments) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR?

Page 3

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

DIRECTOR 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended. 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels 

Parcel Identification Number: 

11-76-0026-0117-00-7 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Residential 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR. 

$322,300 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

$293,282 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

$644,588 

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 

5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

$322,300 (md) 

TFyou believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature 

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Michele M Bennett

PDF reading copy

← View full record