Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses - 9-23-25 (2).pdf
3303 John F Donnelly Drive LLC, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Holland, Respondent · 25-002057-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 3303 JOHN F DONNELLY DRIVE LLC, Docket No. 25-002057 Petitioner, Parcel No. 70-16-17-300-067 Vv. HOLLAND CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Respondent. Paul Bach Bradley J. Fisher (P64608) CARDINAL TAX ADVISORS SCHOLTEN FANT P.O. Box 80361 Attorneys for Respondent Rochester, MI 48308 100 N. Third St., PO Box 454 Phone: (248) 856-8676 Grand Haven, MI 49417-0454 Paul.bach@cardinaltaxadvisors.com Phone: (616) 842-3030 bfisher@scholtenfant.com RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PROPERTY TAX PETITION NOW COMES RESPONDENT, HOLLAND CHARTER TOWNSHIP, by and through its attorneys, Scholten Fant, and for its Answer to Petitioner’s Property Tax Petition, states as follows: 1. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Not applicable. 4. Not applicable. 5. Not applicable. 6. Admitted. 7. Not applicable.
Page 2
8. Not applicable. 9. Not applicable. 10. Denied as untrue. The Property is located in Holland Charter Township, Ottawa 11. Admitted that Holland Charter Township is responsible for the subject assessments. 12. Neither admitted nor denied for lack of sufficient knowledge or information as to form a belief and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 13. Admitted upon information and belief. 14. Admitted. 15. Not applicable. 16. Admitted 17. Neither admitted nor denied for lack of sufficient knowledge or information as to form a belief and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 18. Denied as untrue. 19. Respondent requests that the Tribunal deny Petitioner’s request for relief, affirm the existing assessments, and award such further relief as it deems appropriate under the circumstances. 20. Respondent requests that the Tribunal deny Petitioner’s request for relief, affirm the existing assessments, and award such further relief as it deems appropriate under the circumstances. 21. Respondent consents to electronic communications. WHEREFORE, Respondent Holland Charter Township respectfully requests that the Tribunal deny Petitioner its requested relief, affirm Respondent’s assessment of the subject property, award Respondent its costs and attorney’s fees in responding to this action and award
Page 3
such further relief as it deems appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 23, 2025 Bradley J. Fisher (P64608) Attorneys for Respondent Holland Charter Township
Page 4
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PETITIONER’S PROPERTY TAX PETITION NOW COMES HOLLAND CHARTER TOWNSHIP, by and through its attorneys, Scholten Fant, and hereby offers the following Affirmative Defenses to the Petitioner’s Property Tax Petition: I. The appropriate methods of assessing the Subject Property were used and those methods conform to the methods used to assess similarly situated property in the State. 2. Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 3. Petitioner may not be a proper party-in-interest. 4. Petitioner may not have standing to appeal. 3: The Tribunal may lack subject matter jurisdiction over this appeal. 6. Petitioner may have failed to comply with state property tax law by, inter alia, failing to report or failing to report completely its assessable property such that its property taxes were delinquent or underpaid, such that Petitioner is precluded from appealing its property values, and, such that Respondent should be awarded damages. 7. Respondent reserves the right to add additional affirmative defenses as they become known to it through discovery in this matter. WHEREFORE, Respondent requests that the Tribunal affirm the 2024 assessed and taxable values as determined by Respondent, dismiss the Petition, and award Respondent its costs, attorney fees and any other relief that the Tribunal determines is fair, just and equitable. SCHOLTEN FANT Dated: September 23, 2025 Bradley J. Nisher (P4608) Attorneys for Respondent Holland Charter Township
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 3303 JOHN F DONNELLY DRIVE LLC, Docket No. 25-002057 Petitioner, Parcel No. 70-16-17-300-067 v. HOLLAND CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Respondent. Paul Bach Bradley J. Fisher (P64608) CARDINAL TAX ADVISORS SCHOLTEN FANT P.O. Box 80361 Attorneys for Respondent Rochester, MI 48308 100 N. Third St., PO Box 454 Phone: (248) 856-8676 Grand Haven, MI 49417-0454 paul.bach@cardinaltaxadvisors.com Phone: (616) 842-3030 bfisher@scholtenfant.com PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the Respondent's Answer to Property Tax Petition and Affirmative Defenses to Petitioner's Property Tax Petition was e-filed with the Michigan Tax Tribunal and served upon all parties and/or attorneys of record to this action to their addresses as disclosed by the pleadings, on September 23, 2024, via U.S. Mail First Class, from Grand Haven, Michigan, with postage thereon fully prepaid. Dated: September 23, 2025 Legal Assistant to Bradley J. Fisher