26 - Detroit - 1400 POS.pdf

1400 Woodbridge Ventures LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit Respondent · 26-001352-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

1400 WOODBRIDGE VENTURES LLC, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MTT Docket # 26-001352 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

) ss. 

COUNTY OF OAKLAND) 

Aaron M, Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on September 1€ 

2026 he served a 

copy of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. 

J— 

J 

Aaron M. Fales

BY CERTIFIED UNITED STATES MAIL, RETURN RECEIFT REQUESTED: 

CLERK 

DETROIT 

804 CAYMC, 2 WOODWARD AVENUE 

DETROIT, MI 48224 

ASSESSOR 

DETROIT 

804 CAYMC, 2 WOODWARD AVENUE 

DETROIT, Mi 48226 

AND BY FIRST-CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL: 

CLERK 

. 

WAYNE COUNTY 

CAYMC, 

2 WOODWARD AVENUE #211 

DETROIT, Mi 48226 

DIRECTOR OF EQUALIZATION 

WAYNE COUNTY 

500 GRISWOLD ST. 2157 FLOOR 

DETROIT, MI 48226 

SECRETARY OF SCHOOL BOARD 

DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 

7321 2ND AVENUE, 14TH FLOOR 

DETROIT, Mi 48202-4050 

STATE TREASURER 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 

: 

TREASURY BUILDING 

430 W. ALLEGAN ST. 

LANSING, Mi 48922

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

1400 Woodbridge Ventures LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001352 

City of Detroit, 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER 

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.7354, even if the petition was served 

when filed. 

A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. 

Under TTR 235(1), “[tlhe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default. 

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. 

Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules. 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

Entered: August 10, 2026 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, 

if any, utilizing either the mailing

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

1400 WOODBRIDGE VENTURES, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket #26-001352 

VS. 

Parcel No. 08000059. 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

Respondent. 

/ 

AMENDED PETITION 

1400 WOODBRIDGE VENTURES, 

LLC 

(“"Pefitioner”), through 

its 

attorneys, 

Law Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

I. 

Petitioner's principal office address 

is 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 300, 

Birmingham, MI 48009. 

Petitioner 

is a party in interest with respect to property 

taxes on real property tax parcel no. 08000059. ("Petitioner's Property"), at 1551 

West Lafayette, Detroit, MI, 48226. 

2. 

Respondent, City of Detroit assesses and collects property taxes on 

Petitioner's Property. 

3. 

In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property to be $296,800 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $180,881 resulting 

in 

a 

state 

equalized 

value 

of 

the same 

amount 

based 

on 

the 

tentative

4, 

Petitioner's Property 

is classified 

as Commercial Real Property. 

Petitioner's Property 

is commercial property. 

Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes. 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, {b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 

6. 

Atthis time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there 

is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 

7. 

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, 

imposed 

on 

Petitioner's 

Property, 

and 

the 

taxes 

fo 

be 

levied 

and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

(a) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

faxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(c} 

The 

assessment, 

including 

taxable 

value 

and/or 

state 

equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash

(d) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable 

value, 

and 

the 

mode 

of 

assessment 

adopted 

by 

Respondent, 

discriminate against 

Petitioner and deny Petitioner 

its constitutional 

rights 

to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

WHEREFORE, 

Petitioner requests 

that 

the Tax Tribunal 

enter an Order 

reducing the 2026 taxable value 

of Pefitioner's Property from $180,881 

fo 

$50,000, 

and 

reducing 

the 

2026 assessed and 

state equalized values 

of 

Petitioner's Property from $296,800 to $50,000, and requiring Respondent to 

pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

By: 

EE 

a 

ASran M. 

Eales [P72844) 

330 Hamilton Row, Suite 350 

Birmingham, Mi 48009 

(248) 767-9840 

Dated: June 17, 2026

← View full record