Petition - Campus Village Flint.pdf

Campus Village Flint, LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Flint Respondent · 26-001112-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Petition Page 1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

Campus Village Flint, LLC, 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26- 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel Nos. 40-13-152-007 & 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40-13-152-008 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v. 

 

City of Flint, 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John D. Gaber (P45294) 

John E. Scheibelhut (P74253) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, P.C. 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

380 N. Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

jdg@wwrplaw.com 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition 

 

 

Petitioner Campus Village Flint, LLC, by and through its attorneys, Williams 

Williams Rattner & Plunkett, PC, states as follows for its Entire Tribunal Property 

Tax Petition. 

The Parties 

1. 

Petitioner Campus Village Flint, LLC is a Michigan limited liability 

company with its registered office located at 2545 North Opdyke Road, Auburn Hills, 

Michigan 48326.

Petition Page 2 

2. 

Respondent City of Flint is a Michigan city with its primary offices 

located at 1101 S. Saginaw Street, Flint, Michigan 48502. 

The Subject Properties 

3. 

Petitioner owns properties identified as follows: 

Parcel No. 

Address 

40-13-152-007 

500 N Chevrolet Drive 

40-13-152-008 

508 N Chevrolet Drive 

 

They are referred to collectively in this Petition as the “Subject Properties.” 

4. 

The Subject Properties are located in Genesee County and are within 

the Flint City school district. 

5. 

Respondent possesses jurisdiction to assess and collect property taxes 

for the Subject Properties. 

The 2026 Assessments 

6. 

For the 2026 tax year, Respondent classified the Subject Properties as 

commercial real property. 

7. 

For the 2026 tax year, Respondent established the Subject Properties’ 

assessments for property taxes in the amounts set forth on the attached Multiple 

Parcel Form. 

8. 

Petitioner contends that lawful assessments of the Subject Properties 

for the 2026 tax year cannot exceed the amounts set forth on the attached Multiple 

Parcel Form. 

9. 

The amounts in dispute therefore equal the amounts identified on the 

attached Multiple Parcel Form.

Petition Page 3 

10. 

This Petition presents issues involving the Subject Properties’ valuation 

for assessment purposes. Petitioner does not believe that this Petition presents any 

issues arising out of “additions” or “losses” as the General Property Tax Act, MCL 

211.1 et seq. (the “GPTA”), defines those terms, but reserves its right to assert issues 

involving losses should information supporting such issues become available. 

11. 

The Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments (a) violate the Michigan 

Constitution, the GPTA, and other Michigan law, (b) are based on erroneous 

principles and information, (c) are based on the misapplication of valuation 

principles, and (d) otherwise violate Petitioner’s rights. 

12. 

Petitioner does not assert that the Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments 

are not uniform aside from the lack of uniformity resulting from Respondent 

overestimating the Subject Properties’ values. 

Conclusion and Request for Relief 

 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this honorable Tribunal 

enter judgment revising the Subject Properties’ 2026 assessments to amounts that do 

not exceed Petitioner’s contentions of value set forth on the attached Multiple Parcel 

Form and granting Petitioner all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan 

law. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WILLIAMS WILLIAMS RATTNER 

 

 

 

 

 

& PLUNKETT PC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By: 

/s/ John D. Gaber 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 John D. Gaber (P45294) 

 John E. Scheibelhut (P74253) 

Dated: May 19, 2026 

 

 

Attorneys for Petitioner

Multiple Parcel Form Page 1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

Campus Village Flint, LLC, 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26- 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel Nos. 40-13-152-007 & 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40-13-152-008 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v. 

 

City of Flint, 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John D. Gaber (P45294) 

John E. Scheibelhut (P74253) 

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER 

& PLUNKETT, P.C. 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

380 N. Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 300 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 642-0333 

jdg@wwrplaw.com 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entire Tribunal Petition Multiple Parcel Form 

 

 

1. 

The values established for the Subject Properties by Respondent’s 

March 2026 Board of Review are as follows: 

Parcel No. 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

40-13-152-007 

 2,536,000 

 1,268,000 

 699,389 

40-13-152-008 

 1,888,000 

 944,000 

 837,819 

Totals: 

 4,424,000 

 2,212,000 

 1,537,208 

 

 

2. 

Petitioner contends that lawful 2026 assessments for the Subject 

Properties cannot exceed the following amounts:

Multiple Parcel Form Page 2 

 

Parcel No. 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

40-13-152-007 

 860,000 

 430,000 

 430,000 

40-13-152-008 

 640,000 

 320,000 

 320,000 

Totals: 

 1,500,000 

 750,000 

 750,000 

 

 

3. 

The amounts in dispute for the 2026 tax year are therefore as follows: 

Parcel No. 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

40-13-152-007 

 1,676,000 

 838,000 

 269,389 

40-13-152-008 

 1,248,000 

 624,000 

 517,819 

Totals: 

 2,924,000 

 1,462,000 

 787,208

← View full record