25-003043 Motion for Recon 2.10.26.pdf
Jerome Morgan, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 25-003043-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Jerome Morgan Petitioner(s) ) MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.25-003043 City of Detroit Respondent(s) MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 1. A default was entered against me on November 6, 2025 and, if applicable, the default was extended on December 8,2025 2. Good cause exists to set aside the default because: Respondent did not receive mail in a timely manner. Mail was sent to Wayne County before routed to the City of Detroit. 3. l ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. TDD . Party/Representative (sign here) Ouag Wy b Holo Ae [Print/type name"of person sigrling] | certify that on this date | served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative. February 10, 2026 Tw K ole Date (sign here) ~~ \| MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Jerome Morgan Petitioner, v. MTT Docket No: 25-003043 City Of Detroit, Respondent, PROOF OF SERVICE TO CURE DEFAULT On January 12, 2026, I Dorothy Manley mailed the Respondents Answer to cure default relative to the above captioned matter : Jerome Morgan Michigan Tax Tribunal 15450 Dale St. P. O. Box 30232 Detroit, MI. 48223 Lansing, Michigan 48909 I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. Dated: January 12, 2026 Dorothy Manley Q Appraiser [V Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 2 Woodward Ave., Suite 804 Detroit, Michigan 48226
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 25-003043 | Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information First Name: ML: Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government: Dorothy Manley Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): County: 2 Woodward Ave. Ste. 804 Wayne | City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Detroit mi 48226 Telephone Number: Fax Number: 313-775-0872 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via emai): 1 taxtribunal@detroitmi.gov Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name: MIL: Last Name: Firm Name (if any): Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Telephone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): L N | Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? a Yes No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. Oves [Ono Not Applicable
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal The Petitioner appeal to the March Board of Review where the appeal was granted. The | City of Detroit values are inline with the ECF Neighborhood and the 2025 Assessed and Taxable Values are fair and uniform. We ask that the Assessed Values be sustained. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitionar protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [# Yes [|] No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March O July [m} December ffno, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Bor? [] Yes [No *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or D ber BOR r d the ment(s) atissue, did it have authority? [_] Yes [ ]No If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? O Yes No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? [J ves No Hf 50, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? [ma] Yes (] No if Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: O March O July O December List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? a Yes O No BN Hf Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March [J July [J December Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Real Personal (check one) a Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial i Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) +4 Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 259,800 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 148,377 | What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 519,600 ) ] Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 259,800 if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. N/A Signature “required Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative's Signature: . Dorothy Manley |