2026 Petition - EJP2 - Eastpoint 1-3.pdf
Ejp2 LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit Respondent · 26-001036-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
EJP2 LLC,
Petitioner,
vs.
CITY OF DETROIT,
Respondent.
/
MTT Docket #26-00
Parcel No. (Various – See Below)
PETITION
EJP2 LLC (“Petitioner”), through its attorneys, Law Office of Aaron M. Fales,
P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is 8901 E Jefferson, Detroit, MI
48214. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on
contiguous real property tax parcel no(s). 19008054., 19008055., 19008056.,
19008057., and 19008058. ("Petitioner's Property"), at 1130-1170 Holcomb, Detroit,
MI, 48226.
2.
Respondent, City of Detroit assesses and collects property taxes on
Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the value of Petitioner's Parcels as:
Address
Parcel #
2026 AV/SEV
2026 TV
1130 Holcomb
19008054.
$ 924,900
$ 325,588
1140 Holcomb
19008055.
$ 5,500
$ 4,033
1152 Holcomb
19008056.
$ 749,000
$ 301,471
1160 Holcomb
19008057.
$ 747,500
$ 283,382
1170 Holcomb
19008058.
$ 6,600
$ 4,888Page 2
4. Petitioner's Property is classified as Commercial Real Property. Petitioner's Property is commercial property. Petitioner believes that Petitioner's Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes. 5. This matter involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value, and (d) uniformity. 6. At this time, Petitioner believes, as it relates to taxable value, that there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss. 7. The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable value, imposed on Petitioner's Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: (a) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment, including taxable value and/or state equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner's Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and,
Page 3
(d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Parcels from the current assessments down to the Following: Requested Requested Address Parcel # 2026 AV/SEV 2026 TV 1130 Holcomb 19008054. $ 150,000 $ 150,000 1140 Holcomb 19008055. $ 500 $ 500 1152 Holcomb 19008056. $ 150,000 $ 150,000 1160 Holcomb 19008057. $ 150,000 $ 150,000 1170 Holcomb 19008058. $ 500 $ 500 and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Dated: ___________, 2026 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner By: _________________________ Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840 May 12