Four Branches 4 - Clayton Twp - ET Petition 2026.pdf
Four Branches 4, LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Clayton Respondent · 26-001059-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FOUR BRANCHES 4, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Dkt. No. CLAYTON TOWNSHIP, Parcel Nos. 25 04 34 400 015 Respondent. 25 04 34 400 014 ______________________________________/ 25 04 34 400 007 and 25 04 34 400 009 PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner 30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 Farmington Hills, MI 48334 248 406 4443 peter@ellensonlaw.com ______________________________________/ ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TAX PETITION – TY 2026 NOW COMES Petitioner, FOUR BRANCHES 4, LLC, through its attorney, PETER ELLENSON, and states as follows in support of this Petition: 1. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to the property taxes for the following parcel numbers: 25 04 34 400 015, 25 04 34 400 014, 25 04 34 400 007 and 25 04 34 400 009 located at 9110 Miller Road, Swartz Creek, MI 48473. 2. Petitioner’s principal office address is 3035 E Grand Blanc Road, Grand Blanc, MI 48439. 3. Respondent Clayton Township assesses and collects the ad valorem property taxes associated with the subject parcels. 4. The subject properties are classified as commercial improved (201). 5. The subject properties are located in Genesee County. 6. This appeal involves the properties’ true cash and taxable values.
Page 2
7. The tax year at issue is 2026. 8. No Board of Review protest was required or filed for the properties. 9. The 2026 values for the subject properties as established by the Respondent at its March 2026 Board of Review are: 25 04 34 400 015 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2,781,000 1,390,500 1,390,500 25 04 34 400 014 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 1,720,400 860,200 860,200 25 04 34 400 007 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 68,400 34,200 34,200 25 04 34 400 009 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 159,400 79,700 79,700 10. Petitioner contends that the values for the subject property are: 25 04 34 400 015 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 900,000 450,000 450,000 25 04 34 400 014 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 900,000 450,000 450,000 25 04 34 400 007 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 50,000 25,000 25,000 25 04 34 400 009 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 150,000 75,000 75,000
Page 3
11. The values in dispute for the subject property are: 25 04 34 400 015 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 1,881,000 940,500 940,500 25 04 34 400 014 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 820,400 410,200 410,200 25 04 34 400 007 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 18,400 9,200 9,200 25 04 34 400 009 True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 9,400 4,700 4,700 12. Petitioner requests that this Honorable Tribunal order the assessing entity to correct its tax rolls to reflect taxable, assessed and state equalized values as indicated above (or on the attached supplement) to issue refunds as appropriate, and to pay interest and costs. 13. The basis for the requested relief is that the assessed and taxable values exceed 50% of the true cash value of the subject property. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Peter Ellenson _______________________________ Date: May 15, 2026 PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) Attorney for Petitioner 248 406 4443 peter@ellensonlaw.com