Williams.pdf

Gregory G Williams Petitioner V Township Of Green Oak Respondent · 26-001153-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

LANSING 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

RECEIVED 

APR 13 2026 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other 

Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of 

Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. 

If you do not submit this document, you may be held in 

default, 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

First Name 

[CXR 

Last Name/Company Name 

Gregory 

G 

Williams 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

8280 Stoney Creek Dr 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

South Lyon 

Mi 

48178 

Telephone Number 248-330-5400 

Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact information 

First Name 

[CEN 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information +use the muttipte parce! form for additional, contiguous parcets. 

How many parcels are you 

appealing? 

if 

you are ap 

Yes* 

No** 

*f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel 

aling more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

Property Address {(No., Street) 

8280 Stoney Creek Dr 

City or Town 

County, 

. 

State 

ZIP Code

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Value 

[J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[] Uncapping of Taxable Value 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

Please see attached documentation 

for explanation. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Did you protest 

the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [7] Yes 

O No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [14 March 

[| July 

[] December 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s): 

0 Not required to attend 

O Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

O Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

Oa Other 

If you checked “other” above, explain:

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

«GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number: '4716-16-415-015 

Classification of Property: 

Real] 

Personal [4 (check one) 

Agricultural] 

Commercial [1 

Industrial (1 

Residential 

[A 

~~ Timber-Cutover (1 

Developmental 

[1 

Utility 

[J (check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established 

| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

by the Board of Review: 369,000 

364,585 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

706,000 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

value by .5) 

353,000 

assessed value) 353,000 

Fee Information 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue? 

[7] Yes 

a No 

If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at 

issue, the filing fee is based on the greater 

of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 

will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $600,000.00 

$300.00 

If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

Ifthe property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Signature *required 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

> 

7 

{ ak 

Isl

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petition — Property Tax Appeal 

Property Address 

8280 Stoney Creek Dr 

Tax Year 

2026 

Current SEV 

$369,000 

Requested SEV 

$353,000 

Section 5 — Reason for Appeal 

I am appealing the 2026 assessed value of $369,000 for my home at 8280 Stoney Creek Drive, 

because I do not believe it is consistent with the way similar homes in my neighborhood are 

being assessed, and it may not reflect its true cash value. 

My home is assessed at about $159 per square foot based on 2,319 square feet of living area. The 

homes I compared it to are in the same development and were built by just two builders using 

essentially the same floor plans. In many cases, the layouts are virtually identical, and the homes 

were clearly intended to be very similar, with only minor differences. 

Even so, those homes are generally assessed at a lower rate—around $152 per square foot on 

average. Based on that, my home is being assessed higher than other homes that are 

fundamentally the same. 

One reason for this difference may be how an exterior structure on my property has been 

classified. From what I’ve seen, similar structures on other homes are not treated the same way, 

which may be increasing my assessed value compared to those properties. 

Given how similar these homes are, I don’t believe the difference in assessed values reflects real 

differences between the properties. For that reason, I believe the current assessment is too high. 

An SEV of about $353,000 would be more consistent with the other homes in the neighborhood 

and result in a more uniform assessment. 

I will provide supporting information, including comparable property data and assessment details 

upon request and presented at the hearing.

WilLhms 

| 

| 

230 crue Crest Pr 

RAR 

_METROPLEX MI" 480 

Govm Lifer, Mz Ygi78 

10 APR 2026 PM9 

L 

[ 

Received 

. 

ee it Nar; Tripo-Ac 

APR 13 2026 

Ro. Box 30232 

LARA 

Ladsmig , ME 

48909 

EPR 

TTT 

RR 

UR Bd ri 

A 

Ee 

TT 

TE 

Ter A 

L

← View full record