25-002625.pdf
Community Choice Credit Union, Petitioner Vs. City Of Norton Shores, Respondent · 25-002625-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED AUG 04 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Community Choice Credit Union | MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-002625 City of Norton Shores Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 1. X__Admit___ Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. na Admit Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition is ___ real ___ personal. 3. nfa_Admit ___ Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 4. na_Admit __ Deny. If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 5. Ma Admit ___ Deny. a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 6. X_Admit___Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-0022625 Page 2 of 4 7. 10. 11. 12. Na Admit ___Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent _ relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): nifa Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional age if necessary): nfa_Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): XX Admit ___Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties located in and what is the address of the property or properties: x Admit ___ Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: nia Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary):
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 25-002625 Page 3 of 4 14. X Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional " page if necessary): 15. X__ Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 852,600 426,300 426,300 17. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 700,000 350,000 350,000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 162,600 76,300 76,300
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-002625 Page 4 of 4 19. Admit X__ Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate _ facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): The values at consitutionally mandated atthe allowed AV and TCV 20. Admit Deny X__ Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): Petitoner alleges zero facts 21. List any separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies to support every ground on which Respondent relies and also has the burden of proof (attach additional page if necessary): records from the assessor will demonstrate that the parcal is assessed at conitutional level 22. List affirmative defenses and the separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies in support of those affirmative defenses (attach additional page if necessary): Signature of Respondent’ Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent; Printed Name of Respondent's Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: Douglas M Hughes Email Address: doughugheslaw@gmail.com Mailing Address:
Page 5
) STATE OF MICHIGAN HAWKS GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS OR RECTOR « GOVERNOR LANSING Com mus NERA Peitioher(s) . MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MOAHR Docket No, 2S "str2425 Ch 5) ego Sloss \" Respondent(s) | JL A Feelin [Narfi@ of person serving/mailing petition] served a copy of the __ Ln cosh relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the party/people being served) PROOF OF SERVICE —— aE 8 MPAA A states that on SC 2s he/she [date of service] [Signaturé or persongyho is serving/mailing copy] pa, fc dot 2, A era [Print/tyBe name o
Page 6
DOUGLAS M. HUGHES attorney #25. ov 2a. < Ci a“ Fo rH sd plese” AdSew 14 25 Peto) Ard pata 7 Fonz c= 7 ws 71 He 2 3ver gy
Page 7
attorney § DOUGLAS M. HUGHES Ac) 1 7 pe Te ; bral 5 zo oc 27 ,— Eos a pase AY Fk of) Ps Pp _ ARTS ’ Fos poor IA Fri De - Ltger ct (in Ap dyyrbide? © fy ler A Crh ny. Frat Fr0159
Page 8
4 3. Te flughs > 1414 FOREST PARK RD q MUSKEGON, MI 4 9 4 41 I): ek A2 Crmi