Full record / 25-003057 Extend Default (response).pdf

25-003057 Extend Default (response).pdf

Mary Ann Lamkin, Petitioner V Township Of Hamburg, Respondent · 25-003057-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Mary Ann Lamkin, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003057 

 

Hamburg Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

On September 23, 2025, Petitioner filed an amended petition in response to the 

Tribunal’s September 11, 2025 Order of Default. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the response and the case file and finds that Petitioner 

was held in default because Petitioner failed to file a completed petition and failed to file 

a copy of the notices giving rise to the appeal, i.e., March Board of Review (BOR) 

results, for the parcel numbers under appeal, Parcel No. 4715-21-200-010 and Parcel 

No. 4715-21-200-009.1 Although Petitioner timely responded to the Order of Default, 

their attempt to cure is incomplete because Petitioner failed to sign the amended 

petition and failed to file a copy of the BOR results. However, the answer, filed by 

Respondent on October 6, 2025, included a copy of the BOR results for Parcel No. 

4715-21-200-010, thus partially setting aside the required notice portion of the default. 

In order to set aside the default, Petitioner still must file a completed signed petition and 

file a copy of the BOR results for Parcel No. 4715-21-200-009.2 Though the Tribunal 

finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply 

with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history 

of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal for failure to timely comply with this 

order.3 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file a completed signed Petition for Valuation Appeal, (2) file a copy of the 

BOR results for Parcel No. 4715-21-200-009, (3) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and 

(4) file proof the motion was served on Respondent. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition shall note the docket number assigned by 

the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the 

 

1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 A complete list of Tribunal rules can be found online at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

3 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003057 

Page 2 of 2 

 

assigned docket number as an “Amended Petition.” 

 

The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.4 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 237.5 

 

 

Entered: November 7, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

 

4 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 

5 See also MCL 205.732.

PDF reading copy

← View full record