Diver.pdf
John F Diver Petitioner V Township Of Emmett Respondent · 26-000831-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED APR 0 9 2026 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUN, GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, © GOVERNOR padi DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I Last Name/Company Name John F DIVER Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4465 Shamrock Ln City or Town State ZIP Code Emmett Mi 48022 Telephone Number 810 395 8458 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Navy994@MSN.COM Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name MI. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information “use the multipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? [J vest [1] No 1 **|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., Street) 4465 SHAMROCK IN Noa City or Town County . State ZIP Code Emmett ST. Clair MI 48022
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check at that appty) True Cash and Taxable Value Taxable Value Only (calculation) Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal Please refer to the attached Addendum for this section Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [i] No #f Yes, check which BOR you attended: March [W] July [Hl] December if No, please check the applicable reason(s): [J Not required to attend 0 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) [| Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order [Hl] Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 1 other if you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Number:
74-19-019-1002-000
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal [1 {check one)
Agricultural [1
Commercial
1
Industrial (1
Residential
Yimber-Cutover [J
Developmental (J
Utitity [J (check one)
Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board of Review:
No Assessed Value Established by BOR | No Taxable Value Established by BOR
What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)?
$700,000 Fair Market is not known as True Cast Value nor is True Cash Value the same as Fair Market Value
What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash
What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed
value by .5)
Assessed Value is the Same as last year with no Transfer of Ownership
| 255638€d ValUR}
Taxable Value is ast years Taxable Value chainged by Caped Value Foimuia
Fee Information
Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue?
Yes
m} No
If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees.
If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute.
If you are appealing more than one
parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00
wilt be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a totat filing fee of $1,000.00
1f your property is residential property (see MCL 206,762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$125.00
$100,000.01 to $500,000.00
$200.00
$Over $500,000.00
$300.00
If the property is
NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$250.00
* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above.
If the property is NOT residentia property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the
appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Signature sgequired
badass
pics
's Signature:
John
F. DiverPage 4
Addendum to Property Tax Appeal 2026 Section 5: Reason for This Appeal Concerns with Emmett Township Tax Authority Accusations are being made regarding the values listed on Form L-4400, which was provided by the Emmett Township Tax Authority. According to the Emmett Township Personnel Roster, the Tax Authority is comprised of the Chief Assessor, Mr. Mike Butler, who also serves as the Township Supervisor, and Ms. Elisha Messina, the Certified Assessor, who is legally subordinate to the Supervisor as outlined in MCL 41.61. There is no Assistant Assessor listed on the roster. Please Refer to Enclosure No. 1 Form L-4400 “Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification” o The Tentative Equalization Factor should be 1.07712, not 1.000 as presented on Form L-4400. This is supported by references MCL 211.34(2) and MCL 211.34a, as well as the Equalization Chart as provided by the St. Clair County Equalization Office. o The State Equalized Value cannot be correct because the incorrect Tentative Equalization Factor was used. State Equalized Value is determined by the County Equalization Factor, which is supplied by the St. Clair County Equalization Office (ref. MCL 211.24(5)). e The Assessed Value was increased (changed) by $20,700.00. This indicates that uncapping has occurred. Assessed Value will only change to the current year’s State Equalized Value when there is a "Transfer of Ownership" (ref. 211.27a(3)). e The Assessed Value has been changed, which affects the Taxable Value. Assessed Value is the base for Taxable Value, and Taxable Value is only changed using the Capped Value Formula. (ref. Capped Value Formula, Proposal A). e The notice of the Board of Review Meeting on Form L-4400 was incorrect, and the recommendations provided from the State Tax Commission were unacceptable. Many recipients of the Form L-4400 have no other means of learning when or where they can protest their property tax. The requirements of MCL 211.24¢ and the OPEN MEETINGS ACT were not met. (refer to enclosure 3, Meeting Minutes) Board of Review Composition and Procedures Additional accusations have been raised regarding the composition and procedures of the Emmett Township Board of Review. Mike Butler, the Chief Assessor and Township Supervisor, is also the designated Board of Review Secretary. However, he was not present,
Page 5
(Please Refer to Enclosure No. 2 Form L- 4035 “Petition to Board of Review” page 2) e The "Reason for Board Action" was not provided as required for Section 1 "Assessed Value" and Section 2 "Tentative Taxable Value." The petitioner was not given a reason for the rejection of their petition. e The petitioner did not request a review of his “Classification” Section 3 or “Qualified Agricultural Property Exemption”, Section 4 as depicted on the returned Form L- 4035. e The minutes indicate the Board of Review had a quorum of two people, but only two board members had been appointed by the Township Board, rather than the three required by MCL 211.28(2). e Mr. Brent Messina was presented as the Assistant Assessor without credentials. He had limited knowledge of the assessment process, was not being paid by the Township, and the Township was not aware of his qualifications. His only apparent qualification was being the son of the Assessor, Ms. Elisha Messina. e Neither the Chief Assessor, Mike Butler, nor the Assessor, Ms. Elisha Messina, were present at the hearings to answer questions from the petitioner or Board of Review members. e Acopy of the individual property owners filing of Form L-4035 was not included in the minutes provided to the petitioner. This requirement is specified in the Board of Review Instructions on Form L-4035, page 2. General Points of Contention Although these points may seem minor at first glance, they highlight the inability of property owners to receive fair and equal taxation according to Michigan Compiled Law. The issue does not stem from the Chief Assessor, the Certified Assessor, the Board of Review Members, the local Treasurer, the County Equalization Office, or the County Tax Commission. Instead, all aspects of taxation ultimately fall under the Michigan Tax Commission. The Michigan Tax Commission does not publish clear and concise instructional or informational material, nor do they adequately train their subordinates. They rely on unsubstantiated statements rather than applying Michigan Compiled Law to support their opinions. The Michigan Tax Commission should be held accountable for their lack of attention to tax laws. Enclosure No. 1 Form L-4400 “Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification” provided by the Emmett Township Property Tax Office Enclosure No. 2 Form L- 4035 “Petition to Board of Review” page 1 completed by the Petitioner page 2 supposedly completed by the 2 members of the board of Review Enclosure No.3, Meeting Minutes?
Page 6
< aes THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL L-4400 Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24c and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. FROM E(|SHA MESSINA, MAAO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION EMMETT TOWNSHIP RARER Rese FAAB-R-1002:000 : 11100 DUNNIGAN ROAD © EMMETT, MI 48022 "PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4465 SHAMROCK LN EMMETT, MI 48022 . SCHOOL DISTRICT CODE: 74040 OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: EXEMPTIONS DIVER JOHN / SYLVIA TRUST % Exempt As "Homeowners i 100.00% 4465 SHAMROCK LN y FE 9 EMMETT MI 48022 a % Exempt As "Qualified Agricultura 0 00% Kl ’ % Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal: .00% * Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal’; 00% lg Disabled Veteran or SUI £7 Yes No Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property” ¢_'[] Yes [X] No SR — sf mm? oo "Devel []Yes [X] No LEGAL DESCRIPTION: } BEG N153'11"E 2643.22", N139'17"E 649.40" & N887'49"W 653.26' FR S887'E 650.75", TH $152'11"W 668.57 TO BEG SECTION 19 T7N R14 ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 40 Residential ’ PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION IF DIFFERENT: 401 | esidential 1 CURRENT CHANGE FROM JAMOUNT TENTATIVE AMOUNT PRIOR YEAR TO 2025 YEAR: 2026 CURRENT YEAR 1. TAXABLE VALUE: 160,026 4,320 2. ASSESSED VALUE: 301,300 20, 700 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: ALi hed = 4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV) 301,300 20,700 5. WAS THERE A TRANSFER OF ow 6. Assessor Change Reason(; Telephone Number: Email Address: (810) 384-8070 168 EMMETTTOWNSHIPASSESSOR@YAHOO.COD March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet:at the following dates and times: THE EMMETT TOWNSHIP MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW WILL BE HELD AT 11100 DUNNIGAN ROAD, EMMETT, Mi 48022
Page 7
Michigan Department of Treasury 618 (Rev. 12-25) Petition to Board of Review L-4035 This form is issued under the authority of PA. 206 of 1893, as amended. Filing is voluntary; however, you may not appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal unless you first protest to the Board of Review, except when the property is classified as commercial real, industrial real, or developmental real. You may not appeal properly classification to the State Tax Commission unless you first protest to the Board of Review. TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER’S AGENT Owner’s Name (Please Print or Type) DIVER John /Sylvia Trust Petitioner's Name (If Other than Owner. Please Print or Type) Township or City County Year of Appeal Emmett Township St. Clair 2026 The undersigned protests the assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value and/or the property classification and/or the qualified agricultural property exemption of the following described property: § Property Identified (Parcel code required. Property address and legal description optional.) Ub Parcel Code: 74-19-019-1002-000 Address: 4465 Shamrock Emmett, Ml 48022 BEG N153'11'E2643.22,N139'17"E649.40'&N887'49"W653.26'FROM 1/4COR TH N8B7'49"W 653.47", TH N26'10"668.73', TH S887'E 650. 75, TH $152'11"W668.57'TO BEG Section 19 0 77 Jad 01 A tion, ) N Qualified Agricultural © 7 Property Exemption Protested tem: X| Assessed Value [X] Tentative [] Taxable Status. EL Classi Taxable Value (exemption) 1, PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT Complete this section for a protest of assessed value, including assessed value changes associated with exempt status and denied or late filed personal property forms. TN @ Assessed Value Owner's Estimate of True Cash Value (Market Value) $322,000 $700,000 2. PROTEST OF TAXABLE VALUE Complete this section for a protest of Taxable Value. Reason: [] value of Losses [¥ae 0 3. PROTEST OF CLASSIFICATION A Complete this section for a request to change the classificz tion. The Board of Review must make their decision regarding classification in accordance with Section 211.34c of the Michigan Compiled Laws. The rd of Review shall not be influenced by the effect that a particular classification has on that property's status as a homeowners principal residence or qualified agricultural property.) Classification of property on this year’s assessment roll 401 Residential - Improved Classification should be (check one of the Tollowing): ) [1 Agricultural RQ CO [industrial [] Timber Cutover ] Utility (Personal Property Only) [[] commercial % JX Residential [H] Developmental 4. PROTEST OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY If the assessor has denied or r changed the percentage of the exemption from the 18 mills of local school operating tax for qualified agricultural proper- ty, the owner may appeal this action to the March Board of Review. THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS NO AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER ORACT UPON THE EXEMPTION FROMTHE 18 SCHOOL OPERATING MILLS FOR HOMEOWNER'S PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE PROPERTIES.) Percent qualified agricultural exemption requested by owner (Enter 100 if full exemption requested) N it \dditions IH Poverty Exemption Uncapping % * == Percent qualified si eglption granted by assessor (Enter 0 if exemption denied) REASON FOR PROTEST
Page 8
618, Page 2 FOR BOARD OF REVIEW USE ONLY INSTRUCTIONS: Incorporate a copy of this form and the assigned number in the Board of Review minutes Petition Number , Parcel Code Mio—pol _ 74-19-019-1002-000 1. ASSESSED VALUE Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. X[ vented [I] Assessed Value Changed From [ | to [ - | Record of Vote — Board or three-member committee of board £ Chairperson: [XT Yes [ll No i Member: Difes 0 No P 6 Member: O Yes O No Initials Initials [ a Initials Reason for Board Action = % Ifyou disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by fili petiion with je Vicioen Tax Tribunal at PO Box 30232, Lansing, MI 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Pe bs Personal Property may be appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber-Cutover Real and Agricultural Personal Property may be appeal July 31. The petition must be filed yi michigan.gov/taxlib. | on a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are avail cl 2. TENTATIVE TAXABLE VALUE V & Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below * B [[Aoenied [| Tentative Taxable Value Changed From (See attached L-4035A) J ) Record of Vote — Board or three-member comm of board Chairperson: [Aves [ne Member: Initi Reason for Board Action Ifyou disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative taxable vi you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at PO Box 30232, Lansing MI 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber-Cutover Real and Agricultural Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed on a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax “Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at wyvav.michiaan.qov/taxtrib. tial 3. CLASSIFICATION *\ 5 Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review muse the reason for its action below. [+4 Denied O Classification Changed From to Record of Vote — Board or three-member co} ee ofboad | 2 Chairperson: [73 ves O No 2 ~ Member: BA Yes [Ine £ . p Member: [] Yes [Ino i Reason for Board Action | | \ i yp oo Ifyou disagree with the decision of th Board of Review regarding classification, you may appeal by sending Form 2167 fo the State Tax Commission at PO Box 30471, Lansing MI 48909, by June 30. - : 4. QUALIFI AGRICUL "URAL PROPERTY EXEMPTION x : ; 4 r Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. Il Exemption percent modified from % to %
Page 9
Emmett Township 11100 Dunnigan Rd., Emmett MI 48022 2026 Board of Review Organizational Meeting March, 3, 2026, 3 p.m., held at the Emmett Township Hall, 11100 Dunnigan Road, Emmett, MI 48022, as published. Board Members Present: Mr. Bolday, Mr. Powers Absent; Also Present: Elisha Messina, Assessor and Brent Messina, Assistant Assessor, Residents Mark Sinnott and John Diver Meeting Called to order at 3:05 p.m. on ¢ ) 5 Pat Bolday nominated Larry Powers for Chairman, All Ayes. Motion arti 2d. | ) | Larry Powers nominated Pat Bolday as acting secretary, All Ayes. Motion Carried. Elisha Messina presented the assessment roll to the Board'of Review, along with the assessors L-4037. Board of Review members were presented with the 2026 I ardship Resoltition providing them with the income levels and asset guidelines established by the Board of Trustees, and Land Valuation and ECF studies as well as Township Sales. Discussion LE aN values ‘and market trends and the CPL x2 © Board of Review Members signed the BOR Trainin Correspondence received: Letter fi John Diver regarding the 4400 procedures and his Letters to the Editor of the Yale Expositor, a» LC \« Mr. Diver brought i to ‘the Be ard of Review's attention that the dates on the Notice mailed to residents were incorrect, it was unchanged and sent out with the 2025 dates. Elisha Messina verified the dates were incorrect and immediately contacted the State Tax Commission to determine the necessary steps to ensure tha residents were, properly notified. The steps recommended by the State Tax Commission and completed by the Township were: Posted the corrected notice on the Township website Displayed the notice on the Township sign
Page 10
Motion by Powers to adjourn at 3:45, All Ayes. Motion Carried Emmett Township 11100 Dunnigan Rd., Emmett MI 48022 2026 Board of Review Meeting March, 9, 2026, 1-4 and 6-9 p.m., held at the Emmett Township Hall, 11100 Dunnigan Road, Emmett, MI 48022, as published. Meeting called to order at 1:00p.m. by Bolday, seconded by Powers. All Ayes. Motion =), Correspondence received: Mr. Diver RQ, Present: Mr. Bolday, Mr. Powers Absent: Also Present: Brent Messina, Assistant Assessor MBOR 26-001 MCL 211.30(4)-Assessed/Taxable Corre; 74-19-019-1002-000 Diver John / Sylvia Motion by Powers, second by Bolday to deny petition. Ayes: 2, Nays: 0, Motion Carried. ’ ® MBOR 26-002 MCL 211.30(4)-Assesse 74-19-017-1007-000 Darga Harold Nays: 0, Motion Carrie MBOR 26-003 MCL 211.30(4)-~ A Correction 0 Baur Alexander / Maranda Motion by Bolday, ed to amend SEV from 306,600 to 300,000. Ayes: 2, 74-19-028:300 Motioj cond by Powers to amend SEV from 197,400 to 154,500. Ayes: 2, S: ion:Carried. MBOR 26-004'MCL 211.30(4)-Assessed/Taxable Correction 25-2001-030 DeHate Lawrence / Tammy ion by Powers, second by Bolday to deny petition. Ayes: 2, Nays: 0, Motion Carried. MBOR 26-005 MCL 211.34c-Property Classification 74-19-004-4002-325 Kean William / Jeanie
Page 11
2026 Board of Review Meeting March, 13, 2026, 10a.m.-1p.m. and 2-5 p.m., held at the Emmett Township Hall, 11100 Dunnigan Road, Emmett, MI 48022, as published. Meeting called to order at 10:00p.m. by Bolday, seconded by Powers. All Ayes. Motion Carried Correspondence received: None Present: Mr. Bolday, Mr. Powers Absent: Also-Present: Brent-Messina; Assistant Assessor MBOR 26-006 MCL 211.30(4)-Assessed/Taxable Correction 74-19-005-4003-100 Motion by Bolday, second by Powers to amend SEV ft Nays: 0, Motion Carried. MBOR 26-007 MCL 211.30(4)-Assessed/Taxable Corre : 74-19-001-1002-300 Franck Charles / Janet Motion by Powers, second by Bolday to deny petition. Ayes: 2, Nays: 0, Motion Carried. : Celsius Inc mend SEV from 0 to 615. Ayes: 2, Nays: 0, MBOR 26-008 MCL 211.53b(6)g-Amended P: 74-19-999-0084-000 Motion by Bolday, second by Motion Catried. MBOR 26-009 MCL 211.30(4)- se. le Correction : 74-19-008-4003- Felster Kevin / Yvonne Motion byPowets, s by Bolday to deny petition. Ayes: 2, Nays: 0, Motion Carried. MBOR 26-010 sessed/Taxable Correction Pewinski Blaise / Jessica
Page 12
Please read in sequence. **%k%| etters No. qHEEE* Understanding True Cash Value and Property Taxation in Michigan Calculating True Cash Value ~ Property taxes in- Michigan are governed by the Michigan State Constitution, Chapter 9, Ségtion 3. According to “this provision, property taxes are capped at a maximum of 50% of the property’s True Cash Value. This limitation is a fundamental principle of Property Ad Valorem Taxation within the state for both the State and individual taxpayers to accurately determine the True Cash /alug of a property and understand the methodology used to arrive at this value. 3 Determining True Cash Value: The Assessment Process -4 officially titled “Notice of ility for filling out Form L-4400 falls to nformation is accurately provided The foundation for establishing the True Cash Value of a property is Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification.” espon the Local Assessing Authority. This authority must ensure that ssar to the taxpayer to support the determination of the True Cash V. Taxpayer Rights and the Review Process these hearings, making one is recom to reduce waiting times. Role of True Cash Value in Assessmentsand Tax Rolls It is important to reco, Se Vi s listed on Form L-4400 represent the True Cash Value and are used to create the Assessmen he Ta ax Rolls, in turn, are produced by calculating 50% of the True Cash Value. Unlike the Assessment. Rolls, which are prepared by the Local Assessing Authority, the Tax Rolls are created by the County Tax C ission s/s John F. 4465 Shamro Emmett, Ml 480 Phi 810 395 8458
Page 13
In my last week's Letter to the Editor, published February 6,and 18 it was established that Form L-4400, titled “Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification,” serves as the basis for the methodology used to determine True Cash Value. This form presents three distinct values: Assessed Value, Tentative Equalized Value, and Taxable Value. To fully understand how each of these values contributes to the determination of True Cash Value, it is necessary to carefully examine and comprehend each one. Assessed Value (Past True Cash Value) The statute MCL 211.27 governs the determination of True Cash Value, and there are three primary approaches for establishing Assessed Value, which represents Past True Cash Value: of substitution underlies this approach. Sales Comparison Approach: This approach compares the subject property to sifni been sold recently. Adjustments are made for differences to estimate the market principle of substitution. Income Approach: This approach assesses the income stream gener. yt opetty, applying the principles of substitution and anticipation. Investors commonly: hod to evaluate expected returns. Assessed Value remains unchanged until a “Transfer of Ownership time of acquisition. The concept of “Transfer of Ownership*ais add Esse d in both MCL 211.27a and MCL 211.34d. Although MCL 211.27 and MCL 211.27a ar statfites, both relate to the explanation of True Cash Value. | Equalized Value (Future True Cash Value) Equalized Value is governed by several st Lag MCL 211.34, 211.34a, 211.34b, 211.34c, and 211.34d. Equalization is performed annually acc to qualization Formula: Previous Year's Equalized Value minus losses plus gains, multiplied by;the Tentative Equalization Factor. This factor, required on Form L-4400, is ization Office. published annually by the Local nt The County EqualizationiChatt de ines the Tentative Equalization Factor, which is adjusted for each county, township, or city based rty classification, following MCL 211.34a. Property classification itself is governed by MCL 211.34c. Inline With MCL 211.27a, the Equalized Value (Future True Cash Value) will update the Assessed Valu \& ash Value) when a “Transfer of Ownership” takes place. Taxable -— True Cash Value) Taxable Value is ished based on “Proposal A,” which reformed the process for annual property tax increases. Before “Proposal A,” Equalized Value determined ad valorem property tax increases, and these
Page 14
Taxable Value does not alter Assessed Value (Past True Cash Value); only a “Transfer of Ownership” updates Assessed Value to the current year’s Equalized Value (Future True Cash Value). “Transfer of Ownership” will also uncap the present Taxable Value (Present True Cash Value). Taxable Value is the sole value used to directly determine Tax Value, which, as required by Michigan State Constitution, Chapter 9, Section 3, must not exceed 50% of the property’s True Cash Value. Conclusion The local Tax Authority does not properly complete Form L-4400, titled “Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification,” and this deficiency appears widespread throughout the State, as the Michigan Tax Commission does not enforce the laws set forth in the Michigan State Constitution, Chapter 9, Section 3. A close examination of Form L-4400 provided to taxpayers by the Local Tax Althority will reveal that: J 5 The Tentative Equalization Factor used is incorrect and does not comply with MCL 211. 34A, resbiing in inaccurate State Equalization Values. 4 ® \ 4 y The Assessed Value is being altered annually despite the absence of a “Transfer of Gime and such changes would eliminate the Taxable Value Cap. Adhering to and enforcing tax laws ensures fair and equal property ada Without proper enforcement, the taxation process becomes a Authority, preventing the achievement of fair and equal taxatio \ R \ s/s John F. Diver 4465 Shamrock \ © Emmett, MI 48022 ) Ph# 810 395 8458 | C NJ Advocacy for Constitutional ‘& Legal Cor mpliance in Property Assessment Introduction Property taxation i Michigaf)is fundamental for financing essential local services, such as education, infrastructu re, and" public safety. Every year, local assessors evaluate property values, which become the basis for levying taxes t to support community needs. The state's property tax system should strike a balance between generating necess ry'revenue and ensuring fairness for all property owners. The purpose of these “Letters to the Editor” is to advocate for Fair and Equal Taxation as guaranteed by the Michigan Constitution and Michigan
Page 15
Taxable Value (Present True Cash Value) and Tax Value In my previous Letter to the Editor, published hear today, it was established that Taxable Value is the present year’s True Cash Value and as such is the bases for determining Tax Value which is 50% of that True Cash Value required by the Michigan State Constitution Chapter 9, Section 3. The Taxable Value (True Cash Value) is arrived at by a properly completed Form L-4400 that was prepared by the local Taxing Authority. The Tax Value, which is calculated by the County Tax Commissioner, is by law limited to 50% of the Taxable Value which is this year’s True Cash Value. Incorrect or Illegal Tax Bill If the Property Taxpayers scrutinize their Summer and Winter Tax Bills provided by the Logal Treasurer, Comparing the Taxable Value on both documents, they will find that both are the same (True Tax Value is not based on 50% of True Cash Value as mandated by the Michigan State Constitution, Section 3 but instead is based on 100% of True Cash Value. This means that the Pro Owner is paying 50% more Property Taxes than required by Law. Or put another way we as Property Own repaying twice as much in Property Taxes as we should be. Michigan State Tax Commission of enforcing property taxation laws, except in However, the Commission has not The Michigan State Tax Commission is responsible for all aspe cases where a petition is filed to review a property assessment fulfilled its obligations, resulting in the failure to achieve fair and taxation across Michigan. The Michigan Tax Tribunal is supposed to oversee the Michigan Tax Commission, but it appears to serve merely as an echo chamber for the Commission, providing no real ave ef ffom the shortcomings of an inept and corrupt system. Conclusion The Property Owners of the State, not j ir County, should petition their Legislature Representatives to initiate a comprehensive and independentiinve jon into the qualifications of the Michigan State Tax e Commission. Their grievous neglect of the Michigan State using financial harm to many small farmers and property owners. Commission members and the ope Constitution and Michigan Compiled s/s John F. Diver 4465 Shamrock Emmett, MI 48022 ( Phi# 810 395.845
Page 16
Assessment Taxable Evaluation Flow Chart (Present Day) sy jos. Diver (“Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification” Form L-4400) Assessor's Yearly Noted Changes in The Physical Gains and/or losses as defined by MCL 211.34-34e Aseggers Yearly Noted Gains and/e " Appraisal Record Cards (Inventory List) MCL211.10e Increase of Current year’s Taxable Limit (Proposal “A”) Assessor Initial Physically Evaluates of Property MCL211.27-27e MCL211.10e JFD 4-26
Page 17
PLACE STICKER AT TOP 0
LOPE TO THE RIGHT
OF THE RETURN ADDRES:
ko)
2 ©
John F.DIVER
~
|
AL
4465 shamrock Ln
3
% %
|
ichigan
48022
ER
Emmett, Michigan
, &,
E
2 5%
A589
071.0
5270
212k
218L
8&7
2
% ®
=
Lansing, Michigan 48909-8195
Yev
k
|
:
MOAHR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
9067
6
¥dy
1
611W. Ottawa ST.
{
P.O. Box 30232
|
ae
Panlacay
thy