Full record / Petition - Hartland Towne Square.pdf

Petition - Hartland Towne Square.pdf

Hartland Towne Square LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Hartland Respondent · 26-000560-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

 

 

Hartland Towne Square LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

Hartland Township, 

 

Respondent. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Docket No. 26-____________ 

Parcel No.: 4708-21-400-069, 

and additional parcels 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1. The property that is the subject of this appeal consists of these contiguous real property 

parcels: 

REAL PROPERTY - CONTIGUOUS 

Parcel Number 

Address 

Classification 

Use 

4708-21-400-069 

Highland Road 

202 Comm 

Retail 

4708-21-402-001 

Hartland Square Dr 

202 Comm 

Retail 

4708-21-402-003 

Hartland Square Dr 

202 Comm 

Retail 

4708-21-402-004 

Hartland Square Dr 

202 Comm 

Retail 

4708-21-401-008 

Highland Road 

202 Comm 

Retail 

4708-21-400-076 

Hartland Road 

202 Comm 

Retail 

2. ☒ N/A. 

If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: 

☐ March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review. 

3. Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4. The subject property is located in the County of Livingston and school district of Okemos 

Public School District. 

5. Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject property. 

6. The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 32820 Woodward Ave., Suite 200, 

Royal Oak, MI 48073. 

7. This appeal involves issues related to:

Page 2

2 

☒ 

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

☐ 

the subject property’s taxable value only 

 

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No 

☐ 

uniformity of the subject property’s assessment 

☐ 

the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

8. The tax year at issue is 2026. 

9. The subject property is listed on the attachment, including, by parcel number: 

a. 

Respondent’s Board of Review established values, 

b. 

Petitioner’s value contentions, and 

c. 

Values in dispute. 

10. Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: 

a. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted by the 

Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

b. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true cash 

value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

c. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is taxable 

under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and 

d. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment adopted 

by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional 

rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: April 10, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

 

Filing Fee: $725

Page 3

3 

ATTACHMENT TO PETITION 

(Subject Property) 

 

 

VALUES 

Respondent’s Board of Review -and- Petitioner’s Contention 

Parcel Number 

Respondent 

Petitioner 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

4708-21-400-069 

5,337,800 

2,668,900 

2,668,900 

1,130,000 

565,000 

565,000 

4708-21-402-001 

743,000 

371,500 

371,500 

100,000 

50,000 

50,000 

4708-21-402-003 

743,000 

371,500 

371,500 

100,000 

50,000 

50,000 

4708-21-402-004 

51,400 

25,700 

25,700 

20,000 

10,000 

10,000 

4708-21-401-008 

999,600 

499,800 

499,800 

200,000 

100,000 

100,000 

4708-21-400-076 

3,791,000 

1,895,500 

1,895,500 

1,000,000 

500,000 

500,000 

Totals 

11,665,800 

5,832,900 

5,832,900 

2,550,000 

1,275,000 

1,275,000 

 

 

VALUES IN DISPUTE 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

4708-21-400-069 

4,207,800 

2,103,900 

2,103,900 

4708-21-402-001 

643,000 

321,500 

321,500 

4708-21-402-003 

643,000 

321,500 

321,500 

4708-21-402-004 

31,400 

15,700 

15,700 

4708-21-401-008 

799,600 

399,800 

399,800 

4708-21-400-076 

2,791,000 

1,395,500 

1,395,500 

 

 

 

 

Totals 

9,115,800 

4,557,900 

4,557,900

PDF reading copy

← View full record