Metamora POS.pdf
Jupiter Land Management LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Metamora Respondent · 26-001115-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL JUPITER LAND MANAGEMENT LLC, Petitioner, 2 MTT Docket # 26-001115 TOWNSHIP OF METAMORA, Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) } ss. COUNTY OF OAKLAND) Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on August bo 2026 he served a copy of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. — Aaron M. Fales
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Jupiter Land Management LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001115 Township Of Metamora, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[tthe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 21, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing
Page 3
BY CERTIFIED UNITED STATES MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: Metamora Assessor 730 W. Dryden Road Metamora, Michigan 48455 Metamora Clerk 730 W. Dryden Road Metamora, Michigan 48455 AND BY FIRST CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL: Lapeer County Equalization 255 Clay St. Lapeer, MI 48446 Lapeer County Clerk 255 Clay St. Lapeer, MI 48446 Lapeer Public Schools Secretary of the School Board 250 2ND ST LAPEER, MI 48446 State Treasurer Michigan Department of Treasury Treasury Building 430 W. Allegan St. Lansing, MI 48922
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
JUPITER LAND MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Petitioner,
MTT Docket #26- 001115
Vs.
Parcel No. 015-029-002-10
METAMORA TOWNSHIP,
Respondent.
/
PETITION
JUPITER LAND MANAGEMENT, LLC ("Petitioner"), through their attorneys,
Law Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says:
1.
Petitioner's principal office address is PO Box 480485, New Haven, MI
48048.
Petitioner
is a party
in interest with respect to property taxes on real
property tax parcel no. 015-029-002-10 ("Petitioner's Property"), at § Lapeer Rd.,
Metamora, Mi 48371.
2.
Respondent, Metamora Township assesses and collects property
taxes on Petitioner's Property.
3.
In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's
Property to be $404,500 and assessed Petitioner's Property at $404,500 resulting in
a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative equalizationPage 5
4.
Petitioner's
Property
is
classified
as
Agricultural
Real
Property.
Petitioner's Property
is Agricultural property.
Petitioner believes that Petitioner's
Property was designed fo be used for industrial purposes.
5.
This matter involves issues relating to: {a) valuation, (b} assessment,
(c) taxable value, and {d) uniformity.
6.
At this time, Petitioner believes, as
if relates fo taxable value, that
there is a dispute relative to the value of a loss.
7.
The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable
value,
imposed
on
Petitioner's
Property,
and
the
taxes
fo
be
levied
and
collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the
taxpayer for the reasons that:
(a)
The
assessment,
including
state
equalized
value
and/or
taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and
applicable statutes;
(b)
The
assessment,
including
state
equalized
value
and/or
taxable value, are af higher percentages of frue cash value than permissible
under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;
(c}
The
assessment,
including
taxable
value
and/or
state
equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cashPage 6
(d) The assessment, including state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights fo uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that the Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 taxable value of Petitioner's Property from $404,500 fo $200,000, and reducing the 2025 assessed and state equalized values of Petitioner's Property from $404,500 to $200,000, and requiring Respondent fo pay Petitioner the refunds attributable fo such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. Attorney for Petitioner oy Lf Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 767-9840 Dated: May 19, 2026