Full record / Answer Signed.pdf

Answer Signed.pdf

Zen Troy LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Troy, Respondent · 25-001938-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Zen Troy, LLC 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket: 25-001938 

\ 

Parcel ID 88-20-21-352-016 

CITY OF TROY, 

Respondent. 

/ 

SARAH R. BELLOLI 

LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) 

RYAN 

TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 

Petitioner Representative 

Attorney for Respondent 

101 W. Big Beaver Road 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Suite 945 

Troy, MI 48084 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 524-3320 

(313) 230-0104 

BluhmLG@TroyMi.gov 

Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITION 

NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg 

Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petition, states as follows: 

1. 

As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation. 

2. 

As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation. 

3 

As to Paragraph 3, No answer is required. 

4. 

As to Paragraph 4, No answer is required.

Page 2

7. 

As to Paragraph 7, Respondent admits no board of review protest was 

submitted. 

8. 

As to Paragraph 8, No answer is required. 

9. 

As to Paragraph 9, No answer is required. 

10. 

As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegation. 

11. 

As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegation. 

12. 

As to Paragraph 12, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, and 

leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

13. 

As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that Petitioner has any support for its 

challenge to the subject property's true cash and taxable values. 

14. 

As to Paragraph 14, Respondent admits the allegation. 

15. 

As to Paragraph 15, No answer is required. 

16. 

As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits the allegation. 

17. 

As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that Petitioner has any support or basis 

for its contention of the true cash, SEV, and taxable values for the subject property. 

18. 

As to Paragraph 18, Respondent does not contest the Petitioner's math 

calculations, but denies that Petitioner has any support or basis for its contention of the true 

cash, SEV, and taxable values for the subject property. 

19. 

As to Paragraph 19, Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to its 

requested relief.

Page 3

WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, 

affirm or increase the subject properties assessed and taxable values, subject to county and 

state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. 

Dated: July 2, 2025 

Kt LL 

Lori Grigg Bluhm (P46908) 

City of Troy Attorney's Office 

Attorney for Defendant 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 524-3320 

BluhmLG@troymi.gov

Page 4

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following 

Affirmative Defenses: 

1. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action 

against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, 

discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the 

Respandent or its agents. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish the true cash value, 

assessed value, and taxable value of its property. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the 

property’s taxable value is improper, or failed to conform with the mode and method 

applied in the case of all properties in the City of Troy for 2025. 

. Any decrease in the value of Petitioner's properties was a result of its own intentional 

acts and/or negligence and cannot be allowed to reduce Petitioner's otherwise 

equitable tax burden. 

Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner's property and established 

its assessed and taxable values in accordance with statutory and constitutional 

requirements. 

Respondent reserves the right to argue additional Affirmative Defenses during the

Page 5

affirmed or increased, that Petitioners’ Petition be dismissed with prejudice, and that 

Respondent be granted costs and attorney fees so wrongfully sustained. 

Dated: July 2, 2025 

Sq =a 

Lori Grigg Bluhm (P46908) 

City of Troy pri Ss es 

Attorney for Defendant 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 524-3320 

BluhmLG@troymi.gov 

Certificate of Service 

| hereby certify that on July 2, 2025, 

| served a copy of this Answer and Affirmative 

Defenses via email to Petitioner's representative Sarah R. Belloli at Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

and to the following via first class mail: Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer, 

430 W. Allegan, Lansing, MI 49822; Secretary of School Board, Troy Public Schools, 4400 

Livernois Road, Troy MI 48098; Director of Equalization; Oakland Pointe Office Building, 250 

Elizabeth Lake Road Suite 1000; Pontiac, MI 48341; and Clerk, Oakland County; 1200 N. 

Telegraph, 

Building 12 East, Pontiac, 

MI 48341 

Dated: July 2, 2025 

Led 

Zackary'R Trezona 

City of Troy Attorney’s Office 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, Ml 48084

PDF reading copy

← View full record