Full record / Respondent Answer and Affirmative Defenses 26-002812.pdf

Respondent Answer and Affirmative Defenses 26-002812.pdf

Prop6325 LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Troy Respondent · 26-002812-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL



 PROP6325, LLC,



 Petitioner,

 MTT Docket: 26-002812

 Vv Parcel ID 88-20-03-401-028



 CITY OF TROY,



 Respondent.

 /



 JEFFREY J. FRANKLIN (P71589) LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908)

 FRANKLIN LAW FIRM TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

 Attorney for Petitioner Attorney for Respondent

 410 W. University Drive 500 W. Big Beaver Road

 Rochester, MI 48307 Troy, MI 48084

 (248) 770-7058 (248) 524-3320

 Jeff@FranklinFirm.Org BLUHMLG@TROYMI.gov



 /



 RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES



 NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg



Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows:



 i: As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation.



 2. As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation.



 3. As to Paragraph 3, no answer is required.



 4. As to Paragraph 4, no answer is required.

Page 2

8. As to Paragraph 8, no answer is required.



 9. As to Paragraph 9, no answer is required.



 10. As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits.



 11. As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits.



 12. As to Paragraph 12, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, and



leaves Petitioner to its proofs.



 13. As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that there are any viable issues



concerning the property tax exemption for the subject property.



 14. As to paragraph 14, Respondent admits.



 15. As to Paragraph 15, no answer is required.



 16. As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits the 2026 assessed value and taxable



value of the subject property are accurately set forth by Petitioner.



 17. As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that the 2026 state equalized value is



accurately set forth by Petitioner, but denies that the 2026 taxable value is accurately set forth.



 18. As to Paragraph 18, Respondent denies that Petitioner has correctly calculated



the difference between Petitioner's claimed taxable value for the subject property and the



Respondent's taxable value determination.



 19. As to Paragraph 19, Respondent denies that Respondent is entitled to its



requested relief.



 20. As to Paragraph 20, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, since it

Page 3

WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition,



affirm or increase the subject properties’ assessed and taxable values, subject to county and



state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees.



 Dated: October 6, 2026 CITY OF TROY

 RU

 LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908)

 Attorney for Respondent

 500 W. Big Beaver Road

 Troy, MI 48084

 (248) 524-3320

 BluhmLG@troymi.gov



 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES



 For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following



Affirmative Defenses:



 1. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action



 against Respondent and to support its claim for relief.



 2. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law,



 discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the



 Respondent or its agents.



 3. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish the true cash value,



 assessed value, and taxable value of its property.

Page 4

5. Any decrease in the value of Petitioner's property was a result of its own intentional



 acts and/or negligence and cannot be allowed to reduce Petitioner's otherwise



 equitable tax burden.



 6. Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner's property and established



 its assessed and taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional



 requirements.



 7. Respondent reserves the right to argue additional Affirmative Defenses during the



 pendency of this action.



 WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY denies that Petitioner is entitled to its



requested relief, and requests that the subject property's assessment and taxable value be



affirmed or increased, that Petitioners’ Petition be dismissed with prejudice, and that



Respondent be granted costs and attorney fees so wrongfully sustained.



 Dated: October 6, 2026 CITY OF TROY

 LUE

 LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908)

 Attorneys for Respondent

 500 W. Big Beaver Road

 Troy, MI 48084

 (248) 524-3320

 BluhmLG@troymi.gov

Page 5

Certificate of Service



 | hereby certify that on October 6, 2026, | served a copy of this Answer



and Affirmative Defenses via email to Petitioner's attorney Jeffrey J. Franklin at



Jeff@FranklinFirm.org and also Michigan Department of Treasury, State



Treasurer, 430 W. Allegan, Lansing, MI 49822; Secretary of School Board, Troy



Public Schools, 4400 Livernois Road, Troy, MI 48098; Director of Equalization;



Oakland Pointe Office Building, 250 Elizabeth Lake Road Suite 1000; Pontiac, MI



48341; and Clerk, Oakland County; 1200 N. Telegraph, Building 12 East,



Pontiac, MI 48341.



Dated: October 6, 2026 CITY OF, TROY



 Clara Reid \

 Legal Administrative Coordinator

 500 W. Big Beaver Road

 Troy, MI 48084

 (248) 524-3320

PDF reading copy

← View full record