scanswer_val_class.pdf
Paul P Agosta Petitioner V Township Of Southfield Respondent · 26-000928-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000928 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of Southfield (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name TERRY M.I. D Last Name SCHULTZ Firm Name (if any) OAKLAND COUNTY EQUALIZATION Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 250 ELIZABETH LAKE RD SUITE 1000 WEST City or Town PONTIAC State Michigan ZIP Code 48341 Telephone Number 248-858-0776 E-mail Address appeals@oakgov.com Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? Yes Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION THE PROPERTY'S TRUE CASH, ASSESSED, & TAXABLE VALUES WERE PROPERLY CALCULATED AND ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION, APPLICABLE STATUES, AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped? Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: TB-24-04-126-044 Classification of Property: Real (check one)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 428050 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 428050 What do you believe is the fair market value? 856100 What do you believe is the taxable value? 428050 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ TERRY D. SCHULTZ Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/