Full record / Walker - Alpine Hotels Inc 26-001052 Respondent's Answer with POS 9-2-26.pdf

Walker - Alpine Hotels Inc 26-001052 Respondent's Answer with POS 9-2-26.pdf

Alpine Hotels, Inc Petitioner Vs. City Of Walker Respondent · 26-001052-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

ALPINE HOTELS, INC., 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

CITY OF WALKER, 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001052 

 

Parcel No. 41-13-01-327-001 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/ 

 

 

 

 

Peter Ellenson (P47383) 

LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, PC 

Attorney for Petitioner 

30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 

(248) 406-4443 

peter@ellensonlaw.com 

 

Toby Koenig (P72367) 

BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC 

Attorneys for Respondent 

161 Ottawa Ave NW, Suite 400 

Grand Rapids, MI 49503 

(616) 965-9340 

toby@bloomsluggett.com 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/ 

 

 

 

 

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent, City of Walker, through its attorneys hereby submits this Answer to 

Petitioner’s Petition filed in this matter. 

(1) Respondent neither admits nor denies that Petitioner is a party in interest in this matter 

as Respondent lacks sufficient information and/or knowledge to form a belief as to the truthfulness 

of the allegations and therefore leaves Petitioner to its proofs. Respondent admits the parcel 

number is 41-13-01-327-001 and admits the subject property is located at 450 Center Drive NW, 

City of Walker, 49544. 

 

(2) Respondent lacks sufficient information and/or knowledge to form a belief as to the 

truthfulness of the allegations with respect to Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address 

and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

 

(3) Admitted. 

 

(4) Admitted. 

 

(5) Admitted.

Page 2

2 

 

4898-8420-4492, v. 1 

(6) Respondent admits that Petitioner alleges claims related to the subject property’s 

taxable value and true cash value, but denies that the subject property is improperly assessed and 

further denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. 

 

(7) Admitted. 

 

(8) Respondent admits that the Board of Review reduced the taxable value from $3,442,400 

to $2,754,700. 

 

(9) Admitted. 

 

(10) Respondent denies the values alleged by Petitioner as untrue. 

 

(11) Respondent admits that Petitioner contends the values in dispute based on the 

allegations in paragraph 10; however, Respondent denies as untrue that the subject property is 

improperly assessed and denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. 

 

(12) Paragraph 12 contains a request for relief to which no response is required; 

Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief, requested or otherwise. 

 

(13) Denied as untrue. 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

1. 

Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

 

2. 

Petitioner’s claims against Respondent are barred because the valuation methods 

used by Respondent comply with the Constitution, state law, and prevailing Michigan State Tax 

Commission procedures. 

 

3. 

Respondent’s assessment reflects 50% of the subject property’s true cash value and 

the values on the roll, including the taxable value, comply with MCL 211.27a. 

 

4. 

Petitioner may not be a party in interest capable of bringing this appeal as to the 

parcel at issue in this matter. 

 

5. 

Petitioner’s claims may be barred in whole or in part for failing to allege sufficient 

facts to invoke the Tax Tribunal’s jurisdiction. 

 

6. 

Respondent reserves the right to identify further affirmative defenses as may 

become known through discovery. 

 

WHEREFORE, Respondent requests that the Tribunal dismiss Petitioner’s appeal with 

prejudice and award Respondent its costs, attorney fees, and all such further and additional relief 

as this Tribunal may deem appropriate.

Page 3

3 

 

4898-8420-4492, v. 1 

 

 

Dated: September 2, 2026 

Respectfully submitted by, 

BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC 

 

/s/ Toby Koenig 

 

 

 

 

Toby Koenig (P72367) 

Attorneys for Respondent City of Walker 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Tonya Voakes, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is employed by Bloom 

Sluggett, PC, and that on September 2, 2026, she served a copy of Respondent’s Answer to Petition 

and Affirmative Defenses by first class mail and e-mail upon Peter Ellenson at 

 

Peter Ellenson 

LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, PC 

30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 

peter@ellensonlaw.com 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Tonya Voakes 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Tonya Voakes

PDF reading copy

← View full record