Full record / Stockbridge Renassaince LLC MTT 26-000782 answer & affirmative defenses.pdf

Stockbridge Renassaince LLC MTT 26-000782 answer & affirmative defenses.pdf

Stockbridge Renaissance, LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit Respondent · 26-000782-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

1 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

STOCKBRIDGE RENAISSANCE LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26-000782 

 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

Respondent. 

________________________________/ 

 

ANSWER 

 

 

NOW COMES RESPONDENT, CITY OF DETROIT, by and through its undersigned 

counsel, and in Answer to the Petition filed in this matter states as follows: 

1. Respondent admits. 

2. Respondent admits.. 

3. Respondent admits. 

4. Respondent admits. 

5. Respondent admits. 

6. Respondent admits. 

7. Respondent admits only that Petitioner’s instant Tax Tribunal appeal alleges issues 

involving the subject property’s true cash and taxable values, however, Respondent denies 

that any such allegations have merit. 

8. Respondent admits. 

9. a. Respondent admits as to parcel 03000001.002A However, denies as untrue as to 

parcel 03000001.001 which according to Respondent’s records has a TCV of $850,000 

and an SEV/TV of $425,000.

Page 2

2 

 

b. Respondent neither admits nor denies as Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or 

information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation. 

10. c. Based solely upon Petitioner’s unsubstantiated value contentions Respondent 

admits. 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent further asserts that Petitioner’s claims are barred, in whole or in part, by: 

1. Petitioner’s claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 

2. Petitioner has failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted. 

3. This Tribunal lacks subject matter jurisdiction. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Detroit respectfully requests that this Honorable 

Tribunal dismiss the Petition in this matter and award costs and attorney fees. 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Kevin C. Richard 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin C. Richard (P43417) 

 

 

 

 

 

City of Detroit Law Department 

 

 

 

 

 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

 

 

 

 

 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

 

 

 

 

 

(313) 237-3061 

 

Dated: August 11, 2026

Page 3

3 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

STOCKBRIDGE RENAISSANCE LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26-000782 

 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

Respondent. 

________________________________/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

On August 11, 2026, I sent by Email a copy of Respondent’s Answer w/Affirmative Defenses in 

the instant matter to: 

 

Laura M. Hallahan 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

 

I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Kevin C. Richard 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin C. Richard (P43417) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City of Detroit Law Department 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500 

Dated: August 11, 2026 

 

 

Detroit, Michigan 48226

PDF reading copy

← View full record