Answer 6.23.26.pdf
Samba Danfa Petitioner V Township Of Waterford Respondent · 26-000685-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Print Form PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / POVERTY EXEMPTION 26-000685 MTT DOCKET NO. Respondent’s Contact Information: Local Unit of Government Waterford Township Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 5200 Civic Center Dr City or Town State ZIP Code Waterford MI 48329 Telephone Number Fax Number 248-672-6203 248-674-5455 E-mail Address rbattice@waterfordmi.gov Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information: First Name M.IL Last Name Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Subject Property Information: Parcel Identification Number(s): 13-28-409-001 Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more?
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: Waterford Township stands by the decision set by the board of review. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES OR SEEKS AN EXEMPTION FROM TAXATION: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes [No If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March [J July [J December Was the assessment change notice properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? Yes [No *Please attach a copy of the public record indicating the last known address for the mailing of the notice and proof demonstrating the date the notice was mailed for each parcel being appealed. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [1] Yes [J No If yes, please cite the Board's authority? Were the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [J Yes [No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, when was it issued? What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION List the date the Board of Review denied Petitioner's poverty exemption: Valuation Information: Parcel Number: 13-28-409-001 Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: $251,430 What do you believe is the fair market value? $571,380 What do you believe is the taxable value? $251,430 Electronic Signatu F'€ *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: ) ) , Z . Isl Attorney or Authorized Agent's Signature: Isl