Full record / JOT II - Farmington Hills - 2025 ET Petition.pdf

JOT II - Farmington Hills - 2025 ET Petition.pdf

Jot II, LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Farmington Hills, Respondent · 25-001763-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

JOT II, LLC 

 

Petitioner, 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Dkt. No. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS, 

 

 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

Parcel No. 22 23 18 200 008 

______________________________________/ 

 

 

 

 

 

PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) 

 

 

 

 

LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, P.C. 

 

 

Attorney for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 

248 406 4443 

peter@ellensonlaw.com 

______________________________________/ 

 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TAX PETITION 

 

 

NOW COMES Petitioner, JOT II, LLC, through its attorney, PETER ELLENSON, and 

states as follows in support of this Petition: 

1. 

Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to the property taxes for the following 

parcel number: 22 23 18 200 008, located at 27675 Halsted, Farmington Hills, MI 48331. 

 

2. 

Petitioner’s principal office address is 4858 Willow Lane, Orchard Lake, MI 

48324. 

3. 

Respondent City of Farmington Hills assesses and collects the ad valorem 

property taxes associated with the subject parcel. 

4. 

The subject property is classified as commercial improved (201). 

5. 

The subject property is located in Oakland County. 

6. 

This appeal involves the property’s true cash and taxable values.

Page 2

7. 

The tax year at issue is 2025. 

8. 

No Board of Review protest was required or filed for the property. 

9. 

The values for the subject property as established by the Respondent are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

 

4,422,660 

 

 

2,211,330 

 

 

1,952,620 

 

10. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the subject property are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

 

2,000,000 

 

 

1,000,000 

 

 

1,000,000 

 

11. 

The values in dispute for the subject property are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

 

2,422,660 

 

 

1,211,330 

 

 

952,620 

 

12. 

Petitioner requests that this Honorable Tribunal order the assessing entity to 

correct its tax rolls to reflect taxable, assessed and state equalized values as indicated above (or 

on the attached supplement) to issue refunds as appropriate, and to pay interest and costs. 

13. 

The basis for the requested relief is that the assessed and taxable values exceed 

50% of the true cash value of the subject property. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ Peter Ellenson 

_______________________________ 

 

Date: May 29, 2025 

PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

248 406 4443 

peter@ellensonlaw.com

PDF reading copy

← View full record