Full record / 25-003208_ext def.pdf

25-003208_ext def.pdf

Eusebio Cabanas-Martinez, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 25-003208-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Eusebio Cabanas-Martinez, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003208 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

On October 3, 2025, Petitioner responded to the Tribunal’s September 2, 2025 Order of 

Default by filing a letter explaining the parcels at issue and where they are located, and 

a multiple parcel attachment form. Petitioner also submitted a payment of $25.00. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the response and the case file and finds that Petitioner 

was held in default and required to complete the following to cure the default: (1) submit 

an amended petition, including a completed Section 7; (2) submit the multi-parcel 

attachment form; (3) submit the notices giving rise to the appeal, and (4) submit the 

required petition filing fee, if necessary.1 Petitioner responded to the Order of Default, 

albeit untimely. However, their attempt to cure is incomplete. Petitioner did not fully fill 

out the multi-parcel attachment form, did not submit the notices giving rise to the 

appeal, and did not pay the petition filing fee, as only $25 was paid. Though the 

Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to 

comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a 

history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely 

comply with this order.2 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) resubmit a completed multi-parcel attachment form; (2) submit the notices 

giving rise to the appeal (the Board of Review decisions), (3) submit the required 

petition filing fee, (4) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (5) pay the $25.00 fee required 

for the filing of the motion, and (6) file proof the motion was served on Respondent. The 

foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of entry of this order.3 

 

1 The order further stated: “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003208 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 237.4 

 

 

Entered: November 18, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

sw/sb 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 

4 See also MCL 205.732.

PDF reading copy

← View full record