Petition - POS.pdf
Stockbridge Renaissance, LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit Respondent · 26-000782-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Stockbridge Renaissance, LLC, Petitioner, v City of Detroit, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-000782 _____________________________________________________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE (Property Tax Petition) On the date below I sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the Petition to: City Assessor City of Detroit 2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 804 Detroit, MI 48226 City Clerk City of Detroit 2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 200 Detroit, MI 48226 On the date below I sent by first class mail a copy of the Petition to: Equalization Director Wayne County 500 Griswold, 21st Floor Detroit, MI 48226 County Clerk Wayne County 2 Woodward Avenue, Room 201 Detroit, MI 48226 Secretary, Board of Education Detroit Public Schools Fisher Building, 12th Floor 3011 W. Grand Boulevard Detroit, MI 48202 State Treasurer Department of Treasury 430 W. Allegan Street Lansing, MI 48922 I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. /s/ Laura M. Hallahan Dated: July 14, 2026
Page 2
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS Stockbridge Renaissance, LLC, Petitioner, v City of Detroit, Respondent. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket No. 26-000782______ Parcel No.: 03000001.002A, and additional parcel _____________________________________________________________________________/ PROPERTY TAX PETITION (Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 1. The property that is the subject of this appeal consists of these contiguous real property parcels: REAL PROPERTY – CONTIGUOUS Parcel Number Address Classification Use 03000001.002A 590 E. Jefferson 201 Comm Imp Office 03000001.001 580 E. Jefferson 201 Comm Imp Vacant 2. ☒ N/A. If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: ☐March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review. 3. Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 4. The subject property is located in the County of Wayne and Detroit Public School District. 5. Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject property. 6. The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 3717 Wards Point, Orchard Lake, MI 48324. 7. This appeal involves issues related to: ☒ the subject property’s true cash and taxable values ☐ the subject property’s taxable value only there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ uniformity of the subject property’s assessment ☐ the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______
Page 3
2 8. The tax year at issue is 2026. 9. The subject property is listed on the attachment, including, by parcel number: a. Respondent’s Board of Review established values, b. Petitioner’s value contentions, and c. Values in dispute. 10. Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: a. The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; b. The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; c. The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and d. The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/ Laura M. Hallahan Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Attorney for Petitioner 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 (248) 731-3089 Dated: May 7, 2026 lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com Filing Fee: $650
Page 4
3 ATTACHMENT TO PETITION (Subject Property) VALUES Respondent’s Board of Review -and- Petitioner’s Contention Parcel Number Respondent Petitioner TCV SEV TV TCV SEV TV 03000001.002A 11,350,000 5,675,000 5,675,000 7,000,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 03000001.001 1,357,400 678,700 678,700 600,000 300,000 300,000 Totals 12,707,400 6,353,700 6,353,700 7,600,000 3,800,000 3,800,000 VALUES IN DISPUTE Parcel Number TCV SEV TV 03000001.002A 4,350,000 2,175,000 2,175,000 03000001.001 757,400 378,700 378,700 Totals 5,107,400 2,553,700 2,553,700