Full record / scanswer_valuation.pdf

scanswer_valuation.pdf

Walgreen Co Petitioner V Township Of Grand Blanc Respondent · 26-001476-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001476

 

Respondent’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government:

Township Of Grand Blanc (GENESEE)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address

 

Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any:

First Name

William

M.I. 

Last Name

Delzer

Firm Name (if any)

DELZER LEGAL

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

8332 Office Park Drive

Suite B

City or Town

Grand Blanc

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48439

Telephone Number

8106031000

E-mail Address

wdelzer@delzerlegal.com

 

 

Subject Property Information:

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings.

 *If necessary, attach a separate sheet.

N/A 

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more?

No

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal:

Plaintiff fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support a claim for relief. Petitioner has the burden of 

establishing the property's TCV (see MCL 205.737(3)). Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject property fails to conform 

to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in Respondent's taxing unit. Respondent prays this Honorable Tribunal affirm the 2026 

assessment and taxable value of the subject property and award Respondent costs.

 

Jurisdictional Issues:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES:

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review?

No

If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended:

If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? 

Yes

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, please cite the Board’s authority?

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact?

No

If yes, please explain

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order?

No

If yes, when was it issued?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE:

When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?

Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

 

 

Valuation Information:

Parcel Identification Number:

12-04-651-002

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

 Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

997900

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

982338

What do you believe is the fair market value?

1995800

What do you believe is the taxable value?

982338

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent’s Signature: 

/s/ William E. Delzer

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/

PDF reading copy

← View full record