26-000046 set aside default_motion_grant.pdf
Eschaton LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit, Respondent · 26-000046-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Eschaton LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-000046 City of Detroit, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT On March 24, 2026, Petitioner filed proof evidencing the service of the petition on the six parties in interest. On March 25, 2026, Petitioner filed a motion requesting the Tribunal set aside the default entered in this case on February 13, 2026.1 The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that Petitioner was held in default because Petitioner filed a defective petition. Petitioner responded but failed to cure the default and the Tribunal entered an order extending the time to cure on March 20, 2026, and further required Petitioner file proof of service of the amended petition. Having now filed an amended petition and proof evidencing the service of the amended petition on the six parties in interest, Petitioner has complied with the Tribunal’s orders as required by TTR 237. As such, the Tribunal finds good cause to grant the motion and set aside the default. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside Default is GRANTED. Entered: March 30, 2026 By _____________________________ kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 1 Because Respondent has yet to appear on the instant appeal, it was not required Petitioner serve a copy of the motion on Respondent, thus Respondent has not filed a response.