scanswer_sa.pdf
Scott Ciemniecki Petitioner V City Of Birmingham Respondent · 26-002794-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002794 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Michael M.I. C. Last Name Gibbons Firm Name (if any) Beier Howlett P.C. Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 3001 W. Big Beaver Rd. Suite 600 City or Town Troy State Michigan ZIP Code 48084 Telephone Number 2482821069 E-mail Address mgibbons@bhlaw.us.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Parcel Identification Number(s): 08-19-35-428-015 Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. the special assessment confirmation roll) with this Small Claims Answer if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR If multiple parcels are being appealed are they contiguous or adjoining? N/A Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND) County Oakland Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal In response to the allegations set forth in Section 4 of Petitioner's Petition, Respondent states: The subject special assessment is permitted by all applicable laws, City Charter, and ordinances, and was initiated and levied in full compliance therewith. The special benefits derived from improvement is beyond that provided to the community as a whole and the amount assessed is reasonably proportionate to the benefits derived from the improvement. The Petitioner made public comment at the hearing of necessity, but did not protest at the confirmation of the roll. The Petitioner failed to appeal the special assessment within 30 days after the confirmation of the special assessment roll. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues Did Petitioner protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? No What was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? 2026-03-23 How many years is the special assessment being levied? 5 What is the total amount of the special assessment being levied (per parcel)? 2083 What is the basis for the special assessment? Identify the applicable statutory provision. City of Birmingham's ordinance 91-1 through 94-18 and MCL § 117.1, et. seq., including MCL § 117.4d and 117.24. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Michael C. Gibbons