Consumers Credit Union - City of Lansing 25-002144-TT.pdf
Consumers Credit Union, Petitioner Vs. City Of Lansing, Respondent · 25-002144-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Consumers Credit Union. Petitioner, City of Lansing Respondent. MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002144-TT PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 16% day of September 2025 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing same in an envelope properly addressed to each via USPS first class thereon: Barb Byrum Ingham County Clerk 341 S. Jefferson Mason, MI 48854 Rosemary Anger Ingham County Equalization Director 315 S. Jefferson, 3" Floor Mason, MI 48854 Lansing Public School District Dr. Deyanira Nevarez Martinez, School Board Secretary 519 West Kalamazoo Street Lansing, MI 48933 Michigan State Treasurer Department of Treasury Treasury Building 430 West Allegan Lansing, MI 48922 Mica, ((@ Sos Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Authorized Agent
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Consumers Credit Union. Petitioner, MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002144-TT ) ) ) City of Lansing, ) ) ) ) Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 16%" day of September 2025 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing same in an envelope properly addressed to each via certified mail thereon: Jennifer Czeiszperger City of Lansing Assessor 124 W Michigan Avenue, 3rd Floor Lansing, MI 48933 Chris Swope City of Lansing Clerk 124 W Michigan Avenue, Sth Floor Lansing, MI 48933 Mics (0 ve) Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Authorized Agent
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Consumers Credit Union , MTT Docket No. 25-002144 -TT Petitioner, v City of Lansing ; Respondent. Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467-ofc (917) 488-7825-mobile msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 33-01-05-10-378-010 2. The property identified above is real 3 3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-002144 TT Page 2 of 3 5: 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. The property or properties at issue are in Ingham County. The property or properties’ address is: 6927 S Cedar St, Lansing, MI 48911 The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: City of Lansing Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 7200 Elm Valley Drive, Kalamazoo, MI 49009 This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. The tax year at issue is: 2025. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2025 Board of Review are: Tax True Cash Assessed Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 $4,033,200 $2,016,600 $1,639,933 Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2025 are no more than the following: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 $1,700,000 $850,000 $850,000 The values in contention for tax year 2025 are: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 $2,333,200 $1,166,600 $789,933
Page 5
MTT Docket No. 25-002144 TT Page 3 of 3 16. The 2025 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: (a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; (c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and enter an order reducing the 2025 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Mick (0 re) Dated: May 31 , 2025 By: Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Petitioner's Representative