City's Answer to Petition w Multiple Parcel pgs 1 & 2.pdf
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance, Petitioner Vs. City Of Frankenmuth, Respondent · 25-001888-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
g STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25001888 City of Frankenmuth Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX ANSWER 1. X__Admit ___ Deny. If denied, state the parcel number for the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue: (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Answer Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. X__ Admit Deny. If denied, the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petitionis ___ real ___ personal. 3. X_ Admit ___ Deny. If denied, identify the contiguous and non-contiguous parcels by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 4. X Admit ___ Deny. If denied, identify the parcel or parcels of personal property that are not located on a parcel of real property under appeal by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 5, __ Admit __ Deny. a. If denied, state when the personal property statements were filed, if at all: b. On what date did the March Board of Review commence: 6. X__Admit___Deny. If denied, state the classification of the property identified on the Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition for the tax year or years at issue:
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-001888 Page 2 of 4 7. 9. 10. 11. 12. ___ Admit __ Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): N/A Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional age if necessary): N/A Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, state the facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary). N/A X__Admit ___ Deny. If denied, in what County are the property or properties located in and what is the address of the property or properties: X_ Admit ___ Deny. If denied, what is the applicable local governmental unit: X__ Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary):
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 25001888 Page 3 of 4 14. X__ Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional age if necessary): 15. Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value | State Equalized Value Taxable Value
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-001888 Page 4 of 4 19. Admit Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional page if necessary): The City acknowledges Petitioner's requested relief, but denies as untrue the assertion that it is entitled to that relief. 20. Admit X Deny Neither Admit Nor Deny. If denied, list the separate facts upon which Respondent relies in support of the denial (attach additional age if necessary): 21. List any separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies to support every ground on which Respondent relies and also has the burden of proof (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 22. List affirmative defenses and the separate and specific facts upon which Respondent relies in support of those affirmative defenses (attach additional page if necessary): a ature espo t'§ Authofized Representative or, if none, Respondent: benteg Name of Respondent's Authorized Representative or, if none, Respondent: Michael J. Gildner Email Address: mgildner@sfplaw.com Mailing Address:
Page 5
od STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance | MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-00188% City of Frankenmuth , Respondent. MULTIPLE PARCEL ANSWERFORM 1 OF 2 1. The classification of the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review is: Tax Year Parcel Number Real/Personal Classification 2025 03-11-6-27-1902-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2231-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2225-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2224-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2222-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2221-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2220-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2219-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2218-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2217-000 Real Commercial 2. The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 03-11-6-27-1902-000 [29,928,400 14,964,200 14,964,200 2025 03-11-6-27-2231-000 (527,600 263,800 32,162 2025 03-11-6-27-2225-000 [231,600 115,800 39,558 2025 03-11-6-27-2224-000 [132,800 66,400 22,568 2025 03-11-6-27-2222-000 [26,800 13,400 12,177 2025 03-11-6-27-2221-000 |84,800 42,400 42,400
Page 6
MTT Docket No. 25-001888
Page 2 of 2
3.
Respondent contends that the values for the property identified herein are:
Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value | Taxable Value
2025
03-11-6-27-1902-000
[29,928,400
14,964,200
14,964,200
2025
03-11-6-27-2231-000
[527,600
263,800
32,162
2025
03-11-6-27-2225-000
[231,600
115,800
39,558
2025
03-11-6-27-2224-000
[132,800
66,400
22,568
2025
03-11-6-27-2222-000
[26,800
13,400
12,177
2025
03-11-6-27-2221-000
[84,800
42,400
42,400
2025
03-11-6-27-2220-000
[2,159,800
1,079,900
1,079,900
2025
03-11-6-27-2219-000
[47,200
23,600
21,071
2025
03-11-6-27-2218-000
[47,200
23,600
21,071
2025
03-11-6-27-2217-000
[47,200
23,600
21,071
4.
The values in dispute for the property identified herein are:
Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value
| Taxable Value
2025
03-11-6-27-1902-000
[17,928,400
8,964,200
8,964,200
2025
03-11-6-27-2231-000
[227,600
113,800
113,800
2025
03-11-6-27-2225-000
[31,600
15,800
15,800
2025
03-11-6-27-2224-000
[32,800
16,400
16,400
2025
03-11-6-27-2222-000
6,800
3,400
3,400
2025
03-11-6-27-2221-000
[54,800
27,400
27,400
2025
03-11-6-27-2220-000
[1,559,800
779,900
779,900
2025
03-11-6-27-2219-000
[27,200
13,600
13,600
2025
03-11-6-27-2218-000
[27,200
13,600
13,600
2025
03-11-6-27-2217-000
{27,200
13,600
13,600Page 7
Br TT lo STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Frankenmuth Mutual insurance | Petitioner, E MTT Docket No. 25-001888 City of Frankenmuth , Respondent. MULTIPLE PARCEL ANSWERFORM2 OF 2 1. The classification of the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review is: Tax Year Parcel Number Real/Personal Classification 2025 03-11-6-27-2216-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2215-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2214-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2213-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2212-000 Real Commercial 2025 03-11-6-27-2211-000 Real Commercial 2. The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | Assessed Value | Taxable Value 2025 03-11-6-27-2216-000 [374,400 187,200 187,200 2025 03-11-6-27-2215-000 68,600 34,300 30.477 2025 03-11-6-27-2214-000 [47,800 23,900 21,309 2025 03-11-6-27-2213-000 [47,800 23,900 21,309 2025 03-11-6-27-2212-000 [47,800 23,900 21,309 2025 03-11-6-27-2211-000 [150,800 75,400 75,400
Page 8
MTT Docket No. 25-001888 Page 2 of 2 3. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified herein are: Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value | Taxable Value 2025 03-11-6-27-2216-000 [374,400 187,200 187,200 2025 03-11-6-27-2215-000 [68,600 34,300 30,477 2025 03-11-6-27-2214-000 [47,800 23,900 21,309 2025 03-11-6-27-2213-000 [47,800 23,900 21,309 2025 03-11-6-27-2212-000 [47,800 23,900 21,309 2025 03--1-6-27-2211-000 [150,800 75,400 75,400 4. The values in dispute for the property identified herein are: Tax Year | Parcel Number | True Cash Value | State Equalized Value | Taxable Value 2025 03-11-6-27-2216-000 [187,200 93,600 93,600 2025 03-11-6-27-2215-000 [34,300 17,150 17,150 2025 03-11-6-27-2214-000 [23,900 11,950 11,950 2025 03-11-6-27-2213-000 [23,900 11,950 11,950 2025 03-11-6-27-2212-000 [23,900 11,950 11,950 2025 03-11-6-27-2211-000 [125,800 62,900 62,9000