Kooman Development LLC.pdf
Kooman Development LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Grandville, Respondent · 25-002317-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
PROPERTY TAX YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 CONSULTANTS Mer 2 2S RECEIVED ue MAY 21 2025 AD Clerk of the Court HIE Michigan Tax Tribunal HIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for Kooman Development LLC Parcel # 41-17-16-155-035, v. City of Grandville Dear Clerk, Enclosed please find Petitioner's Petition and Proof of Service for filing in the above captioned matter. Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $400.00 representing the filing fee in this matter. Very truly yours, /) Aylsworth Alac Enclosures
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for Kooman Development LLC, v MTT Docket No. City of Grandville, PETITION Petitioner, Kooman Development LLC, through their agent, Property Tax Consultants, petitions this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioner is Kooman Development LLC whose principal office or address is 8888 Cavalier Court, Jenison, MI 49428. Respondent, City of Grandville, establishes levies and collects the property taxes on the subject property. The property identification is # 41-17-16-155-035 and the subject property address is 3015 Sangra Ave SW, Grandville, MI 49418. The property is classified as industrial, real property. Petitioner’s Property is presently used for industrial. Petitioner believes that Petitioner’s Property was originally designed to be used for industrial. The property is located in Kent County and the school districts of Grandville Public and the Kent Intermediate School District and Grand Rapids Community College. This matter involves issues relating to the true cash and taxable values for the parcel referenced above for the 2025 tax year. For tax year 2025, Respondent’s Board of Review determined an assessed value of $1,375,100 a state equalized value of $1,375,100 and a taxable value of $1,263,099. Petitioner is filing directly with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. The 2025 values set by the respondent are invalid and unlawful as they exceed the amount allowed by Michigan law and the Michigan Constitution and do not reflect the true cash value of the fee simple interest as of the applicable tax date. Petitioner contends the true cash value of the subject property is $1,800,000 which would yield a state equalized value of $900,000 and the taxable value is $900,000. The amount in contention is
Page 3
Dated: May 21, 2025 By: Jon Ay 1th, Property Tax Consultants 861 Pinecrest Ave SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49506 269-366-0300 | jack@skylinepropertytax.com
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for: Kooman Development LLC Petitioner v PETITION City of Grandville Respondent PROOF OF SERVICE Jon Aylsworth, deposes and says that on May 21, 2025 he served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: Clerk of the Court, Michigan Tax Tribunal Via Hand Delivery yan iH ovat