Full record / Answer -- AH Jenison v Georgetown Township MTT 26-000902.pdf

Answer -- AH Jenison v Georgetown Township MTT 26-000902.pdf

Ah Jenison Property Owner LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Georgetown Respondent · 26-000902-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

AH Jenison Property Owner LLC, 

 Petitioner, 

 

v. 

 

Township of Georgetown, 

 Respondent. 

_________________________________/ 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000902-TT 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Hallahan & Associates 

Counsel for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Rd., Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

lhalllahan@hallahanlaw.com 

_________________________________/ 

Ryan M. Shannon (P74535) 

Dickinson Wright PLLC 

Counsel for Respondent 

123 W. Allegan St., Suite 900 

Lansing, MI 48933 

(517) 410-5443 

rshannon@dickinsonwright.com 

 

 

ANSWER 

 

 

Respondent, Township of Georgetown, by and through its counsel, Dickinson 

Wright PLLC, states by like-numbered paragraphs as follows for its Answer to the 

Petition in the above-captioned matter: 

1. 

Denied as untrue. 

2. 

No allegation of fact or law has been made to which a response is required. 

3. 

Admitted. 

4. 

Admitted. 

5. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies as it is without sufficient information, 

and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

6. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies as it is without sufficient information, 

and leaves Petitioner to its proofs.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000902 

Page 2 of 3 

7. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies as it is without sufficient information, 

and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

8. 

Admitted. 

9. 

Admitted; Respondent denies as untrue the allegation that the values for the 

Subject Property are or should be as set forth in the attachment to the Petition. 

10. 

Denied as untrue, including as to each subpart. 

 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the Tribunal deny the 

requested relief, affirm the tax rolls, and grant to Respondent such other and further 

relief as it deems to be within its authority to give. 

 

Submitted Respectfully, 

 

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 

/s/ Ryan M. Shannon 

Ryan M. Shannon (P74535) 

Counsel for Respondent 

 

Dated: June 26, 2026

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26-000902 

Page 3 of 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 26, 2026, he caused a copy of the 

foregoing Answer to be served on counsel for Petitioner via first class mail, postage 

prepaid, at the following address: 

Laura M. Hallahan

Hallahan & Associates 

1750 S. Telegraph Rd., Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

/s/ Ryan M. Shannon 

Ryan M. Shannon 

Dated: June 26, 2026

PDF reading copy

← View full record