Full record / 2024 Answer Form MTT Docket _24-003511.pdf

2024 Answer Form MTT Docket _24-003511.pdf

Tomasz Timek, Ewa Timek, Petitioners V City Of East Grand Rapids, Respondent · 24-003511-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 24-003511 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

ML: 

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government: 

City of East Grand Rapids 

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

County: 

750 Lakeside Dr 

Kent 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

East Grand Rapids 

Ml 

149506 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

616-940-4818 

616-940-4884 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

shayes@eastgrmi.gov 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

M.L: 

Last Name: 

Stacey 

M 

Hayes 

Firm Name (if any): 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

750 Lakeside Dr 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

East Grand Rapids 

MI 

[49506 

Telephone Number: 

Fax Number: 

616-940-4818 

616-940-4884 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

shayes@eastgrmi.gov 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes 

[1 No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

O Yes 

No 

[J] Not Applicable

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Respondent maintains that the 2024 Assessed Value (897,900) set by the March Board 

of Review is determined to be accurate and within a reasonable range of the true cash 

value to the subject property as of December 31, 2023. The respondent will proceed to 

perform a valuation of the property to determine an estimation of value. This report will 

be submitted as evidence prior to a scheduled meeting. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

[| July 

O December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? Od Yes 

O No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? O Yes 

[mn] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [ml] Yes 

No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

1 ves 

No 

If so, what 

is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at 

a BOR? a Yes 

[] No 

f Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [| March 

[] July 

[] December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? [ml] Yes 

[No 

{f Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [| March 

[J yuly 

[] December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[m] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

41-14-33-401-003 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

O 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Rosana! 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

[A 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

897,900 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

897,900 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

1,795,800 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

897,900 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Signature required 

Respond] 

Attorney/Authorized 

Representative's Signature: 

OCLey Ce

PDF reading copy

← View full record