Full record / Deny_Stip-Grinnell.2026-10-06_16-29-09.pdf

Deny_Stip-Grinnell.2026-10-06_16-29-09.pdf

Mark J Stetten Petitioner V Township Of Rome Respondent · 26-002432-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mark J Stetten, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 MTT Docket No. 26-002432

Township Of Rome,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment filed on October 3, 2026 and finds that the parties have stipulated to true 

cash and/or assessed value that does not appear to be in compliance with MCL 

211.27a(1), which states that "property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value . 

. . ." Id. See also MCL 205.737. Further, the stipulation cannot be entered as drafted 

because it indicates that the parties are agreeing to withdraw the same property and tax 

year(s) that they have agreed to settle in this case. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing in this case shall be scheduled in the normal 

course. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By: /s/ Jason C. Grinnell

Entered: October 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-002432

Page 2 of 2

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mark J Stetten, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 MTT Docket No. 26-002432

Township Of Rome,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment filed on October 3, 2026 and finds that the parties have stipulated to true 

cash and/or assessed value that does not appear to be in compliance with MCL 

211.27a(1), which states that "property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value . 

. . ." Id. See also MCL 205.737. Further, the stipulation cannot be entered as drafted 

because it indicates that the parties are agreeing to withdraw the same property and tax 

year(s) that they have agreed to settle in this case. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing in this case shall be scheduled in the normal 

course. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By: /s/ Jason C. Grinnell

Entered: October 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26-002432

Page 2 of 2

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Mark J Stetten, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 MTT Docket No. 26-002432

Township Of Rome,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment filed on October 3, 2026 and finds that the parties have stipulated to true 

cash and/or assessed value that does not appear to be in compliance with MCL 

211.27a(1), which states that "property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value . 

. . ." Id. See also MCL 205.737. Further, the stipulation cannot be entered as drafted 

because it indicates that the parties are agreeing to withdraw the same property and tax 

year(s) that they have agreed to settle in this case. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing in this case shall be scheduled in the normal 

course. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By: /s/ Jason C. Grinnell

Entered: October 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 6

MTT Docket No. 26-002432

Page 2 of 2

PDF reading copy

← View full record