Full record / 24-003458.pdf

24-003458.pdf

Alnamer Investment LLC, Petitioner V City Of Detroit, Respondent · 24-003458-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

SEP 16 2025 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIG 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEMS 

AN TAX TRIBUNAL 

September 10, 2025 

Alnamer investment LLC 

Petitioner 

\ 

: 

MTT Docket No. 24-003458 

City of Detroit 

Respondent 

PETITIONER'S EXCEPTIONS 

On October 21, 2025, 

a PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL was issued by the Administrative 

Law Judge pertaining to this appeal. The Petitioner's Representative request that this proposed 

order of dismissal be set aside and a proper hearing to be held based on the following facts: 

1. 

As testified at the hearing dated June 27, 2025, the Petitioner's Representative, Sam 

Miller, and the Respondent's Representative, Stacy Smith, both confirmed that a 

stipulation had been agreed upon. 

2. 

After a few phone conversations and e-mails, this stipulation was agreed upon prior 

to the 21 days that is required by the Tribunal for the evidence and valuation to be 

submitted. 

3. 

Petitioner then drew up and forwarded the stipulation to be sighed via e-mail to the 

Respondent's Representative. 

4. 

On June 20, 2025, one week prior to the scheduled hearing, the Petitioner's

Page 2

7. 

At the June 27 hearing, the Respondent testified that although she did initially agree 

to the stipulation, the subject property was is better condition than she thought. 

8. 

Respondent testified that she declined to agree to the stipulation because she had 

visited the site a “few weeks” prior to the hearing. 

9. 

This case relies on the condition and value of the subject as of December 31, 2023, not 

the condition and value as of the summer of 2025. These potential facts have no bearing 

on this appeal. 

in conclusion, and in light of the circumstances stated above, we feel that a fair and 

proper hearing is warranted and should be re-scheduled to determine the facts and 

value of the subject property at the time of the appeal. 

Thank You, 

7 

cm Mille” PropTax America 

Petitioner's Representative

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

AlNamer Investments LLC 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

¥ 

MTT Docket No. 24-003458 

City of Detroit 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Sam Miller 

states that on September 10, 2025 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Petitioner's Exceptions 

relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

City of Detroit / Assessing Office / Stacy Smith 

2 Woodward Ave 

Detroit, Ml 48226 

__Isignature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

Sam Miller

Page 4

26922 Upveloek 

veronLec 

s0 Dl 

PEW 

#578, 7/7 

11 SEP 2025 [AM ISL 

: 

CYR 

; 

r

Vy AV Tar Tr) bows 

Ll 

OFtrws S£ 

L AVS, Mich 

S¢7355

< i. 

23 

48935-10701 1 

Titles Jaffe 

Tie ia 

dbs yids ped ide

PDF reading copy

← View full record