Full record / scpetition_valuation.pdf

scpetition_valuation.pdf

Kevin Michael Marsee Petitioner V Township Of Fenton Respondent · 26-002725-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

1 of 3

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Petitioner’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Individual

Local Unit of Government:

First Name

Kevin

M.I.

Michael

Last Name

Marsee

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

11507 Princewood Circle

City or Town

Fenton Township

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48430-9663

Telephone Number

2489339400

E-mail Address

kevin@prow.us

Subject Property Information:

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

*If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

N/A 

Property Address (No., Street)

52 Chateaux Du Lac

Unit 28 Chateau Du Lac Condominium (93)

City or Town

Fenton

County

Genesee

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48430

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Fenton (GENESEE)

Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

 

Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

2 of 3

The current assessment of $83,000 Taxable Value ($168,000 market value) of this vacant lot is not reflective of the current market value of comparable properties, 

or True Cash Value. The current market value or TCV is substantially less than the Taxable value due to (1) regional lot sales and of past sales in the subject 

community (including the subject property) for $65,000 and $55,000, (2) negative impact by a new assessment of $49,300 to replace the current community well 

system without any additional benefit to the owners, (3) additional costs and variances required to build, and (4) recent attempts for many years to sell the 

property for less than half of the current taxable value. The Board of Review Denied the petition with the Comments "FMV due to amenities in subdivision with 

riparian rights, docking and mooring rights along with clubhouse pool and tennis courts" This lot is not a lakefront lot. Amenities provided are paid for by 

expensive association fees. Analyzing comparable proprties and Advertising the site for sale (for years) without a sale exemplifies a true understanding of both 

positive a negative factors affecting the site and that is in fact how you can determine the actual TCV.

Jurisdictional Issues:

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March

If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

Year(s) Under Appeal:

2026

 

Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

Parcel Number:

06-28-676-028

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

83000

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

83000

What do you believe is the fair market value?

65000

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

32500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

32500

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

3 of 3

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner’s Signature: 

/s/ Kevin M Marsee

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/ 

Fee Information:

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for 

the filing of this appeal.

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel 

with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each 

additional parcel being appealed.

Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential

SEV or TV in contention*

 

 Filing fee*** Filing Fee**

$100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A

More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

No

PDF reading copy

← View full record