24-002460 Amend non contiguous.pdf

Id Capital LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit, Respondent · 24-004251-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

ID Capital LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket Nos. 24-002460 & 

 

 

 24-004251 

 

City of Detroit, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Jason C. Grinnell 

 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEVER 

 

ORDER SEVERING PARCEL NO 22016636-41 FROM MTT DOCKET NO. 24-002460 

 

ORDER ASSIGNING PARCEL NO. 22016636-41 TO MTT DOCKET NO. 24-004251 

 

On September 24, 2025, Petitioner filed a Motion to Sever (motion) Parcel No. 

22016636-41 from this case. Petitioner’s initial petition identified three contiguous 

parcels it intended to appeal, Parcel Nos. 22121161-7, 22121168, and 22016636-041. 

With the filing of this motion, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Contest 

Judgment settling Parcel Nos. 22121168 and 22121161-7, and a severed Entire 

Tribunal petition for Parcel No. 22016636-41. 

 

In its motion, Petitioner admits that Parcel No. 22016636-041 is not contiguous to the 

other two parcels under appeal and Petitioner inadvertently believed it was at the time 

of filing its petition. Petitioner requests the Tribunal sever the non-contiguous parcel 

from this case and assign it a new Docket No. 

 

The Tribunal’s “Glossary of Terms” defines contiguous as “adjoining (i.e., next to each 

other).” Parcel No. 22016636-041 does not satisfy this requirement. The property, as 

stated by Petitioner, is separated from the other parcels under appeal and not directly 

connected to the other two parcels under appeal. 

 

Given the above, the Tribunal finds good cause to grant Petitioner’s motion and sever 

Parcel No. 22016636-041 from this case. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Sever is GRANTED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal for the 2024 tax year 

concerning Parcel No. 22016636-041 is SEVERED from MTT Docket No. 24-002460.

MTT Docket Nos. 24-002460 & 24-004251 

Page 2 of 2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Parcel No. 22016636-041 is ASSIGNED to MTT 

Docket No. 24-004251. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following within 21 days1: 

 

1. Remit the petition filing fee for MTT Docket No. 24-004251 as required by TTR 

223; and 

2. Serve the severed petition on all parties identified in TTR 227 and file proof of 

service of the same. 

 

Failure to complete the above will result in Petitioner being held in default.2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must file an answer in MTT Docket No. 

24-004251 within 28 days of service of the petition.3 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal in MTT Docket No. 24-002460 will continue 

for Parcel Nos. 22121161-7 and 22121168. 

 

 

Entered: October 3, 2025 

 

By _______________________________ 

jcg 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

 

 

1 See TTR 227(5). 

2 See TTR 237. 

3 See TTR 235(1).

← View full record