Full record / Akrivis appraisal 2163 Craigend Ln Lake Orion MI 48362.pdf

Akrivis appraisal 2163 Craigend Ln Lake Orion MI 48362.pdf

The Kelly Pietras Living Trust Petitioner V Township Of Orion Respondent · 26-000698-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 1 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

Desktop Appraisal - Residential - Single Family 

Requested By: 

Kelly Pietras 

Institution: 

Individual 

Request Date: 

6/17/2026 

Evaluation ID: 

YeaYZzDw9HUhm7cDuqmx 

Author: 

Erin Sepmoree 

Intended user: 

Oakland County & Kelly Pietras 

2163 Craigend Ln, Lake Orion, MI 48362 

 

 

 

Effective date: 

1/1/2026 

Report date: 

6/30/2026 

Inspection: 

The author reviewed photos of the subject provided by the client for this report.

Page 2

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 2 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

Subject Information 

Property Type: 

Residential - Single Family

Address: 

2163 Craigend Ln, Lake Orion, MI 48362 

Parcel ID(s): 

09-04-301-032 

Legal Description: 

T4N, R10E, SECS 4 & 9 OAKLAND COUNTY CONDOMINIUM PLAN 

NO 1386 TURNBERRY ON THE NEW COURSE AT INDIANWOOD 

UNIT 32 LIBER 23975 P 547 11-07-01 FR 09-176-019 

Assessment: 

$330,510 (2026)

 

Current & Proposed use: 

primary residence 

Site area:

0.21 acres

Building SF: 

3,301 SF 

Year built: 

2018 

Residential Style: 

2 Story - Site Built (1 living unit) 

 

Subject zoning: 

SE, Suburban Estates 

Flood info: 

Flood Zone(s): X (unshaded) (FEMA Panel 26125C0218F, dated 

9/29/2006) 

The subject is in a residential part of Lake Orion, MI. Recently, property values in the area have 

had modest growth. 

 

Sale History: 

The subject property previously sold on 7/30/2025 for $550,000. 

The property is not currently listed for sale. 

Current Listing: 

None

Offer to Purchase: 

None 

 

Subject source(s): assessor records and general research

Page 3

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 3 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

Intended Use 

tax assessment 

Intended User(s) 

Oakland County & Kelly Pietras 

Marketing Period

0-3 months

Exposure Time 

0-3 months 

Extraordinary 

Assumptions 

The appraiser has not made an exterior or interior inspection of 

the subject property but has reviewed any third party data that has 

been provided. Extraordinary assumptions must be made that 

there are no adverse conditions associated with the improvements 

or the subject site; that the subject is adequately maintained, 

livable, and marketable; and that the subject has no 

functional/external obsolescence that would impact the results of 

this assignment, unless otherwise noted in the report. Additionally, 

this is a retrospective appraisal and an assumption is made that 

the subject is in similar condition as of the retrospective date vs 

report date. The value derived in this appraisal may differ if any of 

these conditions are found to be false. 

Hypothetical Conditions 

There are no hypothetical conditions made in this appraisal. 

Highest and Best Use 

There are no hypothetical conditions made in this appraisal. 

Interest Appraised 

Fee Simple 

Value Indications 

Approach 

 

 

 

Sales Approach 

$585,000

|

$177 per SF 

 

 

 

Reconciled Market Value 

 

 

 

Retrospective

$585,000

Page 4

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 4 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

SUBJECT PHOTOS

Page 5

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 5 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 6

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 6 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 7

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 7 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 8

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 8 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 9

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 9 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 10

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 10 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 11

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 11 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 12

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 12 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 13

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 13 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 14

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 14 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America

Page 15

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 15 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH 1 

SUBJECT PROPERTY

COMPARABLE 1

COMPARABLE 2

COMPARABLE 3

2163 Craigend Ln

108 Greenan Ln

84 Greenan Ln

418 Greenan Ln

Lake Orion, MI 48362

Lake Orion, MI 48362

Lake Orion, MI 48362

Lake Orion, MI 48362

 

 

Subject 

Comp 1 

Adj 

Comp 2 

Adj 

Comp 3 

Adj 

Sale Date 

7/30/2025 

12/19/2025 

$855 

11/26/2025 

$2,330 

8/29/2025 

$8,164 

Sale Price 

$550,000 

$600,000 

- 

$590,500 

- 

$596,000 

- 

Time-Adj Sale 

Price 

$550,000 

$600,855 

- 

$592,830 

- 

$604,164 

- 

Time-Adj $ per SF 

$167 

$209 

- 

$223 

- 

$214 

- 

Location 

 Lake Orion, 

MI 

Lake Orion, MI 

- 

Lake Orion, MI 

- 

Lake Orion, MI 

- 

Site Acres 

0.21 

0.34 

- 

0.26 

- 

0.28 

- 

Year Built 

2018 

2017 

- 

2021 

- 

2009 

- 

Construction 

Quality 

average 

average 

- 

average 

- 

average 

- 

Property 

Condition 

average 

average 

- 

good 

($80,000)

good 

($80,000) 

Building SF 

3,301 

3,933 

- 

2,656 

- 

2,828 

- 

 Finished SF 

above grade 

3,301 

2,872 

$42,900 

2,656 

$64,500 

2,828 

$47,300 

 Finished SF 

basement 

0 

1,061 

($43,501) 

0 

- 

0 

- 

Outbuilding Value 

$0 

$0 

- 

$0 

- 

$0 

- 

Bedroom Count 

4 

4 

- 

4 

- 

3 

- 

Bathrooms 

3/0/0 

4/0/1 

($16,200) 

2/0/1 

$5,600 

2/0/1 

$5,600 

Parking Features 

3/0/0 

3/0/0 

- 

3/0/0 

- 

2/0/0 

$11,000 

Residential Style 

Details 

2-Story 

2-Story 

- 

2-Story 

- 

2-Story 

- 

Final Adjusted 

Value 

$584,054 

$582,930 

$588,064 

Gross 

Adjustments 

$103,456 

$152,430

$152,064 

Net Adjustments 

($15,946) 

($7,570) 

($7,936) 

 

 

1 Please note that the table shown above may use rounded values. The exact values are calculated in a spreadsheet and can include 

many more decimal values than are feasible to display here. 

Sales Approach Indicated Value: 

$585,000 | $177 per SF

Page 16

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 16 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

The subject is a 4-bedroom residential property located in Lake Orion, MI. The search for 

comparable sales focused on similar properties in the subject's area that sold in the past twelve 

months prior to the effective date. When considering the comparable properties, we first applied a 

time adjustment of 4% per year, to account for changing values since the time of each 

comparables' sale. Then, we adjusted each comparable for various traits relative to the subject. 

Key adjustments included condition, finished living area, bath count and car storage. After 

adjustments, the comparable sales range in value from $583,000 - $588,000, which we reconciled 

to a market value indication of $585,000. 

Comparable Sale #1 is a residential property that sits on 0.34 acres of land, and we consider its 

location to be comparable to the subject’s. It is currently being used as a primary residence. The 

main structure was built in 2017 and has approximately 3,933 square feet of building area. We 

consider the property to be in average condition and the improvements are of average quality. 

Comparable Sale #2 is a residential property that sits on 0.26 acres of land, and we consider its 

location to be comparable to the subject’s. It is currently being used as a primary residence. The 

main structure was built in 2021 and has approximately 2,656 square feet of building area. We 

consider the property to be in good condition and the improvements are of average quality. 

Comparable Sale #3 is a residential property that sits on 0.28 acres of land, and we consider its 

location to be comparable to the subject’s. It is currently being used as a primary residence. The 

main structure was built in 2009 and has approximately 2,828 square feet of building area. We 

consider the property to be in good condition and the improvements are of average quality.

Page 17

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 17 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

COMPARABLE SALES MAP 

Property 

Pin

Map Location 

Approx. Distance 

to Subject 

Subject 

S 

2163 Craigend Ln, Lake Orion, MI 48362 

N/A 

Comp 1 

1 

108 Greenan Ln, Lake Orion, MI 

0.5 miles 

Comp 2 

2 

84 Greenan Ln, Lake Orion, MI 

0.6 miles 

Comp 3 

3 

418 Greenan Ln, Lake Orion, MI 

0.2 miles

Page 18

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 18 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

VALUE CONCLUSION 

This report considers the market value of the subject property as of the effective date of the report (the “as 

is” value on 1/1/2026). “MARKET VALUE” means the most probable price which a property should bring in a 

competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting 

prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this 

definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer 

under conditions whereby: 

1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 

2. Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best 

interests; 

3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 

4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable 

thereto; and 

5. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or 

creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. 

Source: 12 CFR § 34.42(h) (2022) 

There are three general approaches that are typically considered during the valuation process: the Sales 

Comparison Approach, the Income Approach, and the Cost Approach. Akrivis includes a Sales Comparison 

Approach with all of our standard valuation reports, and may include additional valuation approaches or 

other supplemental analyses at the request of the client or the discretion of the report’s author. Our 

concluded opinion of value is based on the indications of these analyses. 

Approach 

 

 

 

Sales Approach 

$585,000

|

$177 per SF 

 

 

 

Reconciled Market Value 

 

 

 

Retrospective

$585,000

The subject property is a 4-bedroom, two-story home located at 2163 Craigend Lane in Lake Orion, 

Michigan. Three sales with similar features were discovered and have been analyzed and adjusted for 

differences in attributes toward the attributes of the subject property. 

 

 

Erin Sepmoree

 

erins@akrivisteam.com

Page 19

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 19 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

INTERNAL REVIEW 

FIRREA Compliance 

Report Development 

 

 Report provides reasonable value as of the effective date 

🗹 

 Report provides market value (e.g., not a broker opinion) 

🗹 

 Report based on the subject's actual physical & market conditions 

🗹 

 Report not based on unsupported assumptions 

🗹 

 

 

Report Content 

 

 Identify the location of the property 

🗹 

 Describe the property, as well as its current & projected use 

🗹 

 Provide market value given actual condition, use, and zoning as of the effective date 

🗹 

 Describe the methods used to confirm condition and extent of inspection (if any) 

🗹 

 Describe the analysis performed and supporting information used 

🗹 

 

Internal Review 

Subject data complete 

🗹 

Inspection reviewed & verified 

🗹 

Maps reviewed & verified 

🗹 

Dissertations reviewed & verified 

🗹 

Relevant valuation approaches included & completed 

🗹 

Comparable properties & adjustments reviewed 

🗹 

Market data reviewed & verified 

🗹 

Subject data complete 

🗹 

Inspection reviewed & verified 

🗹 

 

Report source(s): local public data (e.g. assessors), contracted inspectors (e.g. WeGoLook, IVUEIT), 

third-party real estate market data (e.g. Zillow), and third-party map data (e.g. Google Maps) 

 

 

Erin Sepmoree

Page 20

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 20 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

ADDITIONS – SUBJECT TAX BILLS

Page 21

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 21 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

APPRAISER’S CERTIFICATION 

I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

 

The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 

 

The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and 

limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, 

and conclusions. 

 

I have no (or the specified) present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this 

report and no (or the specified) personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 

 

I have performed no (or the specified) services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding 

the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding the 

agreement to perform this assignment. 

 

I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved 

with this agreement. 

 

My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined 

results. 

 

My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or 

reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the 

amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a 

subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal . 

 

My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in 

conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 

 

The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute and the State of 

Michigan relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 

 

I have not made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. 

 

As of the 1/1/2026 observation date, I have completed the Standards and Ethics Education 

Requirements for Candidates of the Appraisal Institute. 

 

Schuyler Van Dreel provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this 

certification. 

 

Erin Sepmoree

erins@akrivisteam.com

Michigan Certified General Appraiser #1205078397

Page 22

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 22 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 

This appraisal is subject to the following underlying assumptions and limiting conditions: 

1. 

The appraisal covers only that property legally described in this report, and the areas and dimensions as shown herein are 

assumed to be correct. 

2. 

The appraisers have made no survey of the property and assume no responsibility in connection with such matters. Any sketch or 

identified survey of the property included in this report is only for purposes of assisting the reader in visualizing the property. 

3. 

The appraisers assume no responsibility for matters involving legal or title considerations. 

4. 

It is assumed that the subject property has a marketable title. 

5. 

The data as compiled and utilized in this report have been secured from sources considered to be reliable; however, no 

responsibility for the accuracy of this information is assumed. 

6. 

Responsible ownership and competent management are assumed. 

7. 

The removal or loss of any portion of this report invalidates the entire appraisal. Further, the allocation of total value to land or to 

improvements, as shown in this report, is invalidated if used separately in conjunction with any other appraisal. 

8. 

The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the existing program of 

utilization. The separate valuations for land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid 

if so used. 

9. 

Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous material, which may or may not be present on the property, was 

not observed by the appraiser. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The 

appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea-formaldehyde 

foam insulation, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on 

the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed 

for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an 

expert in this field if necessary. 

10. The appraiser is held harmless from any liability arising from violations of or noncompliance with the Americans with Disabilities 

Act. 

11. The appraisers are not required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this appraisal unless prior arrangements have 

been made. 

12. Values for various components of the subject parcel and improvements as contained within the report are valid only when making 

a summation and are not to be used independently for any purpose and must be considered invalid if so used. 

13. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication nor may the same be used for any 

other purpose by anyone without the previous written consent of the appraiser or the applicant and, in any event, only in its 

entirety. 

14. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, 

sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the appraiser, particularly regarding the valuation conclusions 

and the identity of the appraiser, of the firm with which he is connected, or any of his associates. 

15. This appraiser has no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised. Neither the employment to make the 

appraisal, nor the compensation derived from it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. 

16. This appraiser has no personal interest in or bias with respect to the subject matter of the appraisal report or the participants to 

the sale. The estimate of market value in the appraisal report is not based upon the race, color, or national origin of the 

prospective owners or occupants of the property appraised, or upon the race, color, or national origin of the present owners or 

occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the property appraised. 

17. The appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. 

Neither may engagement to make this appraisal (or any future appraisals for this client) nor any compensation thereof are 

contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the 

value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. 

18. This appraisal conforms to the Uniform Standards of Professional appraisal Practice (USPAP) adopted by the appraisal Standards 

Board of the appraisal Foundation in compliance with Title X1 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act 

of 1989 (FIRREA).

Page 23

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 23 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

ANNOTATIONS 

This report is written as a Restricted Appraisal of real property, meeting (or exceeding) USPAP Standard 2. 

This report is for exclusive use by its intended user(s): Oakland County & Kelly Pietras. The intended use is 

for tax assessment. This Restricted Appraisal may not contain supporting rationale to fully understand the 

reasons for the opinions and conclusions set forth in this report. The Report contains only brief discussions 

or statements of the data and analysis used to estimate the market value of the subject property. The scope 

of the assignment and report content is specific to the needs of the client. The interest being appraised in 

this case is Fee Simple. Akrivis is not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. 

The author reviewed photos of the subject provided by the client for this report. 

Three generally accepted approaches to value are usually considered: 

 

A Sales Comparison Approach is typically utilized and developed to derive a probable estimate of 

market value for the subject property because similar sales can be utilized in the market. 

 

The Income Approach was considered but was not necessary or applicable in this instance because 

of the difficulty in estimating stabilized net income. 

 

The Cost Approach was considered but was not necessary or applicable in this instance because of 

the difficulty in estimating accrued depreciation. 

 

In instances where multiple approaches are employed, Akrivis will consider all approaches 

performed and will reconcile to a final suggested property value for the subject. 

Akrivis will utilize large commercial databases of comparable real property sales and other data from 

sources, all of which Akrivis reasonably believes to be reliable. However, no responsibility is assumed for 

the accuracy of any information supplied by third parties. Location, property condition, construction quality 

and building square footage will be researched and analyzed. All information will be verified with public 

records when possible or third-party sources deemed to be reliable. 

There are some assumptions and limited conditions for this report. The records from the tax assessor’s 

office may not be accurate, current, fully detailed, or complete. There may be other governmental or public 

records other than the tax assessor’s office with relevant information which were not known to nor used by 

Akrivis unless specifically referenced in this report. Akrivis has not obtained nor reviewed a survey, title 

report, engineering report, natural hazard report or other similar information regarding the subject 

Property. The subject is assumed to be compliant with relevant zoning regulations – if the subject’s specific 

zoning designation is not available, Akrivis may assume a general zoning designation. Unless stated 

otherwise, Akrivis projects that the subject’s future use will be the same as its current use. 

Main Data Source Listing (including, but not limited to) 

1. CoStar 

5. ProxyPics 

2. SDS (Sales Data Service) 

6. AssessorData.org 

3. LoopNet 

7. Zillow (residential citing) 

4. Municipal & County Data 

8. Google Earth

Page 24

Akrivis 

920.716.8776 

 

Page 24 | 24 

question@akrivisteam.com 

 

Made in the United States of America 

We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the statements of facts contained in this report are 

true and correct. Our findings, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and 

limiting conditions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property or bias with respect to the 

property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved. Our engagement and compensation in 

this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results that favor the 

cause of the client. 

Competency Disclosure 

The appraiser has the appropriate experience to appraise a residential property such as the subject 

property and is familiar with the subject’s market. The appraiser took all steps necessary to produce a 

credible indication of value. 

Intended Use Limitation 

The purchaser acknowledges and agrees that they are commissioning an appraisal developed under a 

hybrid scope of work from Akrivis. Certain property data and observations may be provided by third-party 

sources. The appraiser relied on this information as described in the Scope of Work section of the report. 

Use of this report by parties other than the identified intended users is not intended by the appraiser. If the 

report is to be used in connection with legal matters, court proceedings, arbitration, or similar contexts, 

such use may require additional services beyond the scope of this assignment. If any representative of 

Akrivis is requested or required to provide expert testimony, appear in court, participate in depositions, or 

assist in legal proceedings related to this appraisal, the purchaser agrees to compensate Akrivis at its 

standard hourly rate for such services, in addition to reimbursement for related expenses, including but not 

limited to travel, preparation time, lodging, and administrative support. By ordering this hybrid appraisal, 

the purchaser confirms their understanding and acceptance of these terms and conditions.

PDF reading copy

← View full record