Full record / 25_002714 Answer Form.pdf

25_002714 Answer Form.pdf

James Staros, Petitioner V Township Of Chikaming, Respondent · 25-002714-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO. 25-002714-TT 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I. 

Last Name 

Chikaming 

Township 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

13535 Red Arrow Highway 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Harbert 

= 

oe 

Telephone Number 269-469-1 676 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

tswisher@chikamingtownship.org 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

MI. 

Last Name 

Antoinette 

Swisher 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

13535 Red Arrow Highway 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Harbert 

MI 

49115 

Telephone Number 269-469-1 676 xt 44 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

tswisher@chikamingtownship.org 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Oa Yes 

No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

Oves 

Ono 

Not Applicable

Page 2

B 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Assessed value was developed utilizing cost approach for mass appraisal. 

Property 

owner petitioned March Board of Review for a value that reflects 50% of the purchase 

price. The March Board lowered value to an amount higher than requested. 

Please find 

attached: Assessment Notice, Property Record Card, Land Value and Economic Factor 

Analysis, March Board of Review Petition and Notice 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

[mm] No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

O July 

O December 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? [| Yes 

[| No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? O Yes 

[Hm] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? O Yes 

No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

O Yes 

No 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption ata BOR? [] Yes 

[No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Od March 

O July 

O December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? O Yes 

[=] No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [J March 

[J July 

[J December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

O 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

11-07-0026-0001-07-5 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial i 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State re Value) as established by the BOR: 

234,000 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

234,000 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

468,000 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

234,000 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Signature required 

5 

Resp 

it or Atorney/Authorized Representative 

Signaturé:

PDF reading copy

← View full record