Full record / 25-002361.pdf

25-002361.pdf

Financial Plus Credit Union, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Davison, Respondent · 25-002361-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 15 2025 

STATE OF MICHGIGAN 

MICHIGAN Tax 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFARIS 

TRIBUNAL, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

FINANCIAL PLUS CREDIT UNION, 

Petitioner, 

MTT DOCKET NO: 24-002361 

vs 

DAVISON TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

JIM TUBBS TAX CONSULTANTS 

DELZER LEGAL 

Ward D. Tubbs 

William E. Delzer (P68488) 

Representative for Petitioner 

Attorney for Respondent 

G-8469 S. Saginaw Street 

8332 Office Park Drive, Suite B 

Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439 

Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439 

(810) 444-1779 

(810) 603-1000 

jted0543@gmail.com 

wdelzer@delzerlegal.com 

ANSWER TO PETITION 

Davison Township (“Respondent”), through its attorneys, William E. Delzer, 

answers as follows: 

1. 

That as an answer to Paragraph 1 of Petition, Respondent admits the 

allegations contained therein. 

That as an answer to Paragraph 2 of Petition, Respondent admits the 

allegations contained therein. 

N/A. 

N/A. 

N/A. 

That as an answer to Paragraph 6 of Petition, Respondent admits the 

allegations contained therein.

Page 2

10. That as an answer to Paragraph 10 of Petition, Respondent admits the 

allegations contained therein. 

11. That as an answer to Paragraph 11 of Petition, Respondent admits the 

allegations contained therein. 

12. That as an answer to Paragraph 12 of Petition, Respondent neither admits or 

denies and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

13. That as an answer to Paragraph 13 of Petition, Respondent neither admits or 

denies and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

14. That as an answer to Paragraph 14 of Petition, Respondent admits the 

allegations contained therein. 

15. N/A. 

16. That as an answer to Paragraph 16 of Petition, Respondent neither admits or 

denies and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

17. That as an answer to Paragraph 17 of Petition, Respondent denies the 

allegations contained therein as untrue. 

18. That as an answer to Paragraph 18 of Petition, Respondent denies the 

allegations contained therein as untrue. 

19. That as an answer to Paragraph 19 of Petition, Respondent denies the 

allegations contained therein as untrue. 

20. That as an answer to Paragraph 20 of Petition, Respondent denies the 

allegations contained therein as untrue. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent denies Petitioner's prayer for relief and prays that 

this Honorable Tribunal affirm the 2025 assessment and taxable value of the 

subject property and award Respondent costs, attorney fees and any other relief 

that this Honorable Tribunal may deem appropriate. 

Dated: 

[uly 8, 2025 

Respectfully submitted,

Page 3

STATE OF MICHGIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFARIS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

FINANCIAL PLUS CREDIT UNION, 

Petitioner, 

MTT DOCKET NO: 24-002361 

vs 

DAVISON TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

JIM TUBBS TAX CONSULTANTS 

DELZER LEGAL 

Ward D. Tubbs 

William E. Delzer (P68488) 

Representative for Petitioner 

Attorney for Respondent 

G-8469 S. Saginaw Street 

8332 Office Park Drive, Suite B 

Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439 

Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439 

(810) 444-1779 

(810) 603-1000 

jted0543@gmai.com 

wdelzer@delzerlegal.com 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent, Township of Davison asserts the following affirmative defenses: 

1: 

Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of 

action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 

2. 

The Tribunal 

is charged with finding 

a property's true cash value to 

determine the property’s lawful assessment. Alhi Dev Co v Orion Twp, 110 Mich App 

764,767 (1981). 

3 

Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property's true cash value. See 

MCL 205.737(3) and Kern v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (9174). 

4. 

Petitioner has failed to allege that the m

Page 4

5. 

Petitioner failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was 

applied to the true cash value of Petitioner's property, as well as others, to arrive at the 

respective assessments appearing on the roll, and also fails to allege specific and sufficient 

facts to support its allegations that the property's taxable value is improper. 

6. 

Petitioner asks the Tribunal to grant it preference by application of a self- 

chosen method of assessment contrary to the intent, purpose, and law of this State. 

7. 

Petitioner, in essence, asks the Tribunal to grant it an illegal preference by 

application of a method of assessment different from that employed in the assessment of 

other properties in Respondent's taxing unit. 

8. 

Petitioner, in essence, seeks by petition to challenge the process of county 

and state equalization as to which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain a cause 

of action. 

9. 

Any decrease in the value of Petitioner's property was a result of its own 

intentional 

acts and/or negligence and cannot be allowed 

to reduce Petitioner's 

otherwise equitable tax burden. 

10. 

Respondent has property and lawfully assessed Petitioner's property and 

established 

its 

taxable 

value 

in 

accordance 

with 

statutory 

and 

constitutional 

requirements. 

11. 

Respondent reserves the right to raise additional affirmative defenses as the 

same may become known to it during the course of these proceedings. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent prays that this Honorable Tribunal affirm the 2024

Page 5

Dated: 

July 8, 2025 

Respectfully submitted, 

DELZER LEGAL 

~ 

William E. Delzer (P68488) 

Attorney for Respondent

Page 6

STATE OF MICHGIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFARIS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

FINANCIAL PLUS CREDIT UNION, 

Petitioner, 

MTT DOCKET NO: 24-002361 

vs 

DAVISON TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

JIM TUBBS TAX CONSULTANTS 

DELZER LEGAL 

Ward D. Tubbs 

William E. Delzer (P68488) 

Representative for Petitioner 

Attorney for Respondent 

G-8469 S. Saginaw Street 

8332 Office Park Drive, Suite B 

Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439 

Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439 

(810) 444-1779 

(810) 603-1000 

jted0543@gmai.com 

wdelzer@delzerlegal.com 

PROOF OF SERVICE OF 

ANSWER TO PETITION 

I, William E. Delzer, being duly sworn deposes and says that on July 8, 2025 he 

served a copy of Respondent's Answer to Petition and Proof of Service by regular mail 

upon Ward D. Tubbs, Representative for Petitioner, via email as agreed to by the 

parties. 

July 8, 2025 

(.. 

William E. Delzer 

Subscribed and sworn before me on July 8, 2025 

Karen Popilek 

Karen Popilek, Notary, State of Michigan

Page 7

DELZER Y) LEGAL 

8332 Office Park Drive, Suite B 

Grand Blanc, Michigan 48439 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, Michigan 48909 

CHEESE TT EE 

LL Ee 

LL TRL 

RU TER ETH

PDF reading copy

← View full record