Full record / Answer.pdf

Answer.pdf

Temperance Solar, LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Erie Respondent · 26-001323-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

TEMPERANCE SOLAR, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

VS. 

ERIE TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

Adam J. Brody (P62035) 

Deborah I. Ondersma (P55907) 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

Varnum LLP 

333 Bridge Street, N.W. 

P.O. Box 352 

Grand Rapids, MI 49501-0352 

Telephone: (616) 336-6000 

Email: ajbrody@varnumlaw.com 

Email: diondersma@varnumlaw.com 

Philip D. Goldsmith (P37650) 

Attorney for Respondent 

Lennard, Graham & Goldsmith, P.L.C. 

222 Washington Street 

Monroe, MI 48161 

Telephone: (734) 242-9500 

Facsimile: (734) 242-9509 

Email: pgoldsmith@lggplc.com 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001323 

RESPONDENT, ERIE TOWNSHIP’S 

ANSWER TO PETITION; NOTICE 

OF AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Page 2

RESPONDENT, ERIE TOWNSHIP’S ANSWER TO PETITION 

NOW COMES Respondent, 

Erie Township, by and through 

its attorneys, Lennard, 

Graham & Goldsmith, P.L.C., and for its Answer to the Petition filed by Temperance Solar, 

LLC, states as follows: 

1. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 

1 of 

the Petition for the reason that Respondent is without sufficient information to form a belief as 

to the truth of the allegations and therefore Petitioner is left to its strict proofs. 

2. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 2 of 

the Petition for the reason that Respondent is without sufficient information to form a belief as 

to the truth of the allegations and therefore Petitioner is left to its strict proofs. 

Responding 

further, Respondent affirmatively states that the personal property parcel no. 

set forth in the 

Petition is assigned to BGTF 11 Adonis Aggregator, LLC. 

3. 

Respondent admits that no real property is under appeal in the subject Petition. 

Responding further, the real property upon which the subject personal property 

is located 

is 

identified by permanent Parcel No. 58-05-030-027-00, which shows ownership in EEV Holdings 

Temperance, 

LLC. 

Permanent 

Parcel 

No. 

58-02-025-030-20 

is 

situated 

within 

Bedford 

Township, Monroe County, Michigan, and is not part of this Petition. 

4. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 4 of the Petition insofar 

as the allegations relate to personal property Parcel No. 58-05-300-027-00 and permanent Parcel 

No. 58-05-030-027-00. 

5. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 5 of the Petition. 

6. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 6 of the Petition. 

7. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 7 of the Petition. 

8. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 8 of the Petition. 

9. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 9 of the Petition. 

10. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 10 of the Petition.

Page 3

11. 

Respondent acknowledges Petitioner’s contention regarding the values for the 

subject personal property, but denies that said values are accurate. 

12. 

Respondent admits the values in dispute identified by Petitioner. 

13. 

Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to a reduction of the property’s true 

cash, assessed, 

State equalized and taxable values as requested by Petitioner. 

Responding 

further, Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to a refund with interest of taxes paid due 

to the original assessment as requested by Petitioner. 

Responding further, Respondent denies 

that Respondent’s assessment was incorrect, as said assessment was based upon the process and 

procedures to value the subject personal property as outlined in the State Tax Commission 

Memorandum dated April 5, 2022. 

Finally, Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to any 

other relief from the Tribunal. 

14. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 14 of 

the Petition for the reason that Respondent is without sufficient information to form a belief as 

to the truth of the allegations and therefore Petitioner is left to its strict proofs. 

15. 

Respondent denies each and every allegation set forth in paragraph 

15 of the 

Petition, including, but not limited to the allegations set forth in subparagraphs (a), (b), (c), and 

(d). 

Responding further, the Respondent affirmatively states that the 2026 values imposed on 

the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are valid, and were arrived 

at by Respondent following the process and procedures to value the subject personal property as 

outlined in the State Tax Commission Memo dated April 5, 2022. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent requests that the Tribunal grant the following relief: 

A. 

Deny the relief requested by Petitioner and maintain the State equalized and 

taxable values of the property at $16,309,869.00; and 

B. 

Order such further and additional relief to Respondent as this Tribunal shall deem 

appropriate under all of the facts and circumstances. 

NOTICE OF AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

By 

way 

of further Answer, 

Respondent, 

Erie Township, 

sets 

forth 

the following 

Affirmative Defenses.

Page 4

1. 

Upon information and belief Petitioner has failed to identify all parties necessary 

to a just adjudication of the issues raised in the Petition. 

2. 

Respondent affirmatively states that 

it followed the process and procedures to 

value the subject personal property as outlined in the State Tax Commission Memo dated April 

5, 2022. 

Accordingly, the true cash value, assessed value, and taxable value established by 

Respondent are set forth, as follows: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$32,619,738.00 

$16,309,869.00 

$16,309,869.00 

WHEREFORE, Respondent moves 

the Tribunal 

to dismiss 

the Petition, 

including 

all 

requests set forth in the Petitioner’s prayer for relief, affirm the true cash value, assessed value, 

and taxable value, set by Respondent, and award such other and further relief to Respondent as this 

Tribunal shall deem appropriate. 

Respectfully submitted, 

LENNARD, GRAHAM & 

GOLDSMITH, P.L.C. 

Dated: September 3, 2026 

By 

L 

: 

— 

Philip DGoldshith (P37650), 

Attorney for Respondent 

Lennard, Graham & Goldsmith, P.L.C. 

222 Washington Street 

Monroe, MI 48161 

Telephone: (734) 242-9500 

Facsimile: (734) 242-9509 

Email: pgoldsmith@lggplc.com 

PDG/blg 

ERIE\TEMPERANCESOLAR 

answer

PDF reading copy

← View full record