Van-Tubergen.pdf
Keith M Van Tubergen, Barbara J Van Tubergen, Petitioners V Township Of Troy, Respondent · 24-003576-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
VAN TUBERGEN, TREUTLER & HAYES www. vth-law.com Attorneys: 114 N. Third St. Michael T. Van Tubergen, licensed in MI Grand Haven, MI 49417 John P. Hayes, licensed in Mi, PA, SC, NC, OK Phone: 616-844-3000 Scott R. Sewick, licensed in MI Fax: 616-850-1300 Carl W. Treutler, (Retired) info@vth-law.com June 17, 2024 Michigan Tax Tribunal PO Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Appeal To Whom It May Concern, Please find enclosed for review and processing an original and one copy of the Property Tax Appeal Petition Form with two copies of the attachments provided by Petitioners Keith M. and Barbara J. Van Tubergen. Also enclosed is a check for $125.00 for filing fee. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If there are any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Coma) Uo glen Amy J. Vogler, CP For Michael T. Van Tubergen (P61717) Attorney for Petitioners Enclosures
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH PROPERTY TAX APPEAL DOCKET NUMBER MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL PETITION FORM SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Failure to complete this form, including signature, and return it by filing deadline will result in dismissal. If additional space is needed to provide the information requested, please use a separate sheet, 1. Petitioner(s) Name and Address 2. Agent or Attorney (if any) Name and Address Keith M Van Tubergen/Barbara J. Van Tubergen Michael T. Van Tubergen (VTH Law) 13091 Sikkema Dr., Grand Haven, Mi 49417 114 N. 3rd St., Grand Haven, Mi 49417 Petitioner's Daytime Phone No,_(816) 846-4765 Agent/Attorney Phone No. 616) 844-3000 Residential - | d (residential, agricultural, personal, commercial, industrial, timber cutover, 3. Classification of property _hesidential - Improve personal utility, developmental) 4. Location of Property: City Local School District: OR . County_Newaygo Township, Troy Walkerville 5. Did Petitioner protest to the Board of Review? Yes [9] No If no, please check all applicable reasons below and explain in the space provided. [| The Assessment Change Notice was not properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review. Petitioner is appealing within 30 days of issuance of notice of action taken by July or December Board of Review. [| Petitioner is appealing a Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact. [petitioner is appealing within 30 days of issuance of a State Tax Commission Order. [petitioner is appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Taxable Value Uncapping. | 6. Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at the Board of Review? O Yes ® No 7. Check the reason for this appeal and explain in the space provided. jm} The property's true cash value and taxable value are incorrect. (SEE Line by Line Instructions.) The property's taxable value only is incorrect. The uncapping of the property's taxable value is improper. Od Petitioner was denied a property tax exemption. [I] Petitioner was denied a poverty exemption. 8. Provide the Board of Review's determination of the state equalized or assessed value and taxable value for each parcel, for each tax year being appealed. Parcel Number Tax Year State Equalized Value or Taxable Value on Roll Assessed Value on Roll 62-01-28-100-008 2024 | $150,800 $143.960' °°
Page 3
9. Provide Petitioner's contention or belief of the true cash ( fair market) value and taxable value for each parcel, for each tax year being appealed Parcel Number Tax Year True Cash (Fair Market) Value Taxable Value Contention Contention L 62-01-28-100-008 2024 250,000 7° tH 06:5. 8S [] 10. Explain the basis of your appeal. Mobile home was destroyed by fire December 1, 2022. It was replaced (with insurance proceeds) with a new manufacture home (May 2023). Assessor Uncapped the property tax claiming it was entitled ot do SO Or account of New construction. This was not lew construction; itwas reptacement. 11. Does the property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% for the tax year(s) at issue? O Yes: Petitioner is not required to pay a fee for the filing of this appeal. [0) No: Petitioner is required to pay a fee for the filing of the appeal. (See Fee Schedule.) # 00 Failure to remit a required fee with this Form may result in dismissal. Amount Paid 2S 12. If not using an agent or attorney, Petitioner is required to sign: If using an agent or attorney, only agent or attorney is required to sign: Pp ANE - A.cbkagl To Zep WAHT. POIZIT PLEASE RETURN THE ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM WITH TWO COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS to: Michigan Tax Tribunal, PO Box 30232, Lansing, MI 48909. Keep a copy of the Form and any original attachments for your records. The Department of Labor & Economic Growth will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, disability or political beliefs. If you need assistance with reading, writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you may make your needs known to this agency. For further information, please contact the Tribunal at: PH: (517) 373-3003 Web Site: www.Michigan.gov/taxtribunal E-mail: taxtrib@Michigan.gov T7262 Revised 01/05 1973 PA 186, As Amended
Page 4
Addendum to Property Tax Appeal Keith and Barbara Van Tubergen, 13091 Sikkema Dr., Grand Haven, MI 49417 Parcel No: 62-01-28-100-008 - 11191 White Oaks Lane, Bitely, Michigan Statement of Facts Petitioners purchased the Premises in September 2013 and have used this as a second home since that time. It consisted of approximately 16 acres, a double wide manufactured home, an accessory structure (used to be a cabin and was then used as an unattached garage) and a Pole Barn. It has always been used as a gathering place for their family with its primary use being a hunting camp. The manufactured home was situated approximately a half mile from the road and was accessed by a private driveway (shared with others) that is secured by a gate that is usually locked. There is no mailbox for the Premises nor any of other parcels that use the private drive. On December 1, 2022 there was an electrical fire which caused significant damage to the manufactured home. The insurance company determined the value of the home (the structure) at that time was $104,187.00. It estimated the cost to repair (using licensed contractors) was $129,000.00 it declared a total loss and paid the policy limit plus cost for demolition and ancillary expenses. Petitioners replaced the manufactured home with a new manufactured home that was delivered in the spring of 2023. An occupancy permit was issued approximately June 1, 2023. The purchase price for the new manufactured home was $128,375.00 plus, delivery, site preparation and hookup. The 2024 Notice of Assessment states: PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the CURRENT CHANGE 2024 year by approximately: $4,454 prior AMOUNT TENTATIVE FROM PRIOR y +2023 AMOUNT YEAR TO YEAR: 2024 CURRENT YEAR 1. TAXABLE VALUE: 45,777 143,963 98,186 2. ASSESSED VALUE: 63,000 150,800 87 800 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 1.000 4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 63,000 | 150,800 | 87.800 5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in2023 WAS NOT 6. Assessor Change Reason: Mobile Home Added, Mobile Home Removed
Page 5
The Appeal argued it was unlawful to increase the taxable value by a multiple of 3.23 because property taxes may increase by the lesser of inflation or 1.05 whichever is less, minus subtractions and plus additions. (See THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT MCL 211.27a et seq). Property shall be assessed at 50% of its true cash value. (See MCL 211.27a(1). The “taxable value of each parcel of property is the lesser of the following: (a) The property's taxable value in the immediately preceding year minus any losses, multiplied by the lesser of 1.05 or the inflation rate, plus all additions...., (b) The property's current state equalized valuation.” See MCL 211.27a(2). The legislature intentionally did not allow an Assessor to increase taxes for a remodel where a homeowner updated his or her home. This means that if the home were refurbished by tearing down to the studs and starting over there would be no increase. The Board of Review issued a Decision where it reduced the Assessed Value and the SEV to $100,000.00; increasing the property taxes by more than 2 times. This notice was not sent to Petitioners or their attorneys. It was mailed to 11191 N. White Oaks Lane (the location of the structure) where there is no mailbox nor is there anyone there. All previous tax bills and assessments were delivered to Petitioners primary residence in Grand Haven. Petitioners still have not received a notice in the mail. The Board of Review Decision gave no explanation. Petitioners contacted Casey Guthrie (the individual tasked with performing assessment), and he thought his decision was fair. He viewed this as new construction which increases the taxable value. He simply instructed Petitioners to file an appeal and advised Petitioners had until July 31, 2024 to do so. Argument The increase in taxable value unlawfully uncapped the property taxes. The General Property Tax Act provides that Replacement Construction is not “New Construction.” It does allow for an increase (based upon a price per square foot by assessors manual) for increases in square footage if appropriate. The new manufactured home is larger in footprint; however, it was nearly impossible for Petitioners to obtain a 3-bedroom home (from the manufacturer used by their builder) within the 1200 square foot parameter. Moreover, the cost to procure the unit was just less than the estimated cost to repair the existing structure. MCL 211.34d (1)(b)iii) states “New Construction”....“means property not in existence on the immediately preceding tax day and not replacement construction.” Replacement construction is defined as “construction that replaced property damaged or destroyed by accident or act of God and that occurred after the immediately preceding tax day....”
Page 6
» footage at $43.28-$48.21 per square foot. That said this wouid increase the additiongprm $45,777 to somewhere in the ball park of $70,000.00. Petitioners still believe Taxabjgipn light of the equities and limitations imposed when purchasing a replacement is is r . struc
Page 7
Michigan Department of Treasury, THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL L-4400 1019 (Rev, 11-23) Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification mn This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, Sac. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. FROM: CASEY GUTHRIE PARCEL IDENTIFICATION TROY TWP : PT 1958 WALTON ROAD PARCEL NUMBER: 62-01-28-100-008 KINGSLEY, MI 49649 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 11191 N WHITE OAKS LN BITELY, MI 49309 NER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: w a PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION RARE ROTORIS DEGTE ASH % Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence"; 00% VAN TUBERGEN KEITH ET UX BARBARA J % Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": .00% aaa vet HE 9417-8913 % Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal"; 00% IPTCL EL LLY FP PLL ELT ee FYE rem Ld % Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal: 00% Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": a Yes [X] No Exempt As "Development Property": [1 Yes No LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PART N1/2 NW1/4 COM N1/4 COR THS00D 06'16"E 439.64 FT N88D 59' 02"W PARA TO N SEC LINE 1464.61FT N67D 49'32"W 305.11 FT TO FREEMAN CREEK N'LY ALG CRK TO NSEC LINE S88D 59'02"E 1651.20 FT ALG SEC LINE TO POB SEC 28 T16N R14W 16.2 A MIL ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the 2024 PRIOR AMOUNT CURRENT CHANGE FROM year by approximately: $4,454 YEAR: 2023 Ton EA ili 1. TAXABLE VALUE: 45,777 143,963 98,186 2. ASSESSED VALUE: 63,000 150,800 87,800 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 1.000 bil sal lait Sun IRE | 4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 63,000 150,800 | 87,800 5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in2023 WAS NOT 6. essor Change Reason The 2024 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.05 Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: Name: Phone: Email Address: CASEY GUTHRIE (231) 350-9123 GUTHRIE8551@GMAIL.COM March Board of Review Appeal Information. The board of review will meet at the following dates and times:
Page 8
04/16/2024 08:54 AM 2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION FROM CASEY GUTHRIE TROY TWP 1958 WALTON ROAD KINGSLEY, MI 49649 NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address and legal description optional): 62-01-28-100-008 11191 N WHITE OAKS VANTUBERGEN KEITH/BARBARA J en 11191 N WHITE OAKS LANE PART N1/2NW1/4 COM N1/4 COR THSO0D 06'16"E 439.64 FT NB88D 59 02"W PARA TO N SEC LINE 1464.61FT N67D BITELY MI 49309 49'32"W 305.11 FT TO FREEMAN CREEK N'LY ALG CRK TO NSEC LINE S88D 59'02"E 1651.20 FT ALG SEC LINE TO POB SEC 28 TIN R14W 16.2 A M/L "HIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary to compute your assessment and taxable value. The Board has completed their review of parcel number 62-01-28-100-008 They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. Board of Review Comments: THE TROY TOWNSHIP MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW LOWERED THE ASSESSED 8 TAXABLE VALUES [2024 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 150,800 | [2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 100,000 | (If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) [2024 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 143,963 | [2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 100,000 [2024 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 0.0000 Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. “Effective March 1, 2013, the Tribunal is no longer able to accept Small Claims letter appeals. Rather, you are required to file a petition to initiate a new Small Claims appeal. Petition forms are available on this website.” http://www.michigan.gov/taxtrib/0,4677,7-187-38254---,00. html
Page 9
STATE OF MICHIGAN PROPERTY TAX APPEAL DOCKET NUMBER DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL PETITION FORM SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Failure to complete this form, including signature, and return it by filing deadline will result in dismissal. If additional space is needed to provide the information requested, please use a separate sheet. 1. Petitioner(s} Name and Address 2. Agent or Attorney (if any) Name and Address Keith M Van Tubergen/Barbara J. Van Tubergen Michael T. Van Tubergen (VTH Law) 13091 Sikkema Dr., Grand Haven, Mi 49417 114 N. 3rd St., Grand Haven, MI 49417 Petitioner's Daytime Phone No._(616) 846-4765 Agent/Attorney Phone No, (616/844-3000 . : (residential, agricultural, personal, commercial, industrial, timber cutover, 3. Classification of property Residential - Improved personal utility, developmental) 4. Location of Property: City Local School District: OR . County Newaygo ~~ Township Troy Walkerville 5. Did Petitioner protest to the Board of Review? Yes [0] No If no, please check all applicable reasons below and explain in the space provided. [| The Assessment Change Notice was not properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review. Petitioner is appealing within 30 days of issuance of notice of action taken by July or December Board of Review. [I] Petitioner is appealing a Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact. CU petitioner is appealing within 30 days of issuance of a State Tax Commission Order, [i petitioner is appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Taxable Value Uncapping. | 6. Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at the Board of Review? O Yes [0] No 7. Check the reason for this appeal and explain in the space provided. [Tvhe property's true cash value and taxable value are incorrect. (SEE Line by Line Instructions.) The property's taxable value only is incorrect. [The uncapping of the property's taxable value is improper. [I] Petitioner was denied a property tax exemption. [I] Petitioner was denied a poverty exemption, 8. Provide the Board of Review's determination of the state equalized or assessed value and taxable value for each parcel, for each tax year being appealed. State Equalized Value or Taxable Value on Roll Parcel Number Tax Year Assessed Value on Roll 62-01-28-100-008 2024 1$150.800 $143.960' 7°
Page 10
9. Provide Petitioner's contention or belief of the true cash ( fair market) value and taxable value for each parcel, for each tax year being appealed Parcel Number Tax Year True Cash (Fair Market) Value Taxable Value Contention Contention . 62-01-28-100-008 2024 480,000 °° tHE 068 8s 7 10. Explain the basis of your appeal. Mobile home was destroyed by fire December 1, 2022. It was replaced (with insurance proceeds) with a new manufacture home (May 2023). Assessor Uncapped the property tax claiming it was entitled of do 50 on account of Tew construction. THis Was ot Tew Construction; it was replacement; 11. Does the property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% for the tax year(s) at issue? [eo] Yes: Petitioner is not required to pay a fee for the filing of this appeal, fo) No: Petitioner is required to pay a fee for the filing of the appeal. (See Fee Schedule.) £ 00 Amount Paid | zs Faiture to remit a required fee with this Form may result in dismissal. 12. If not using an agent or attorney, Petitioner is required to sign: if using an agent or attorney, only agent or attorney is required to sign: __ #22 e122" - Pic haat To Zep Zl boage | PLEASE RETURN THE ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM WITH TWO COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS to, Michigan Tax Tribunal, FO Box 30232, Lansing, MI 48909, Keep a copy of the Form and any original attachments for your records. The Department of Labor & Economic Growth will not discriminate against any individual or group becauss of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, disability or political beliefs. If you need assistance with reading, writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you may make your needs known to this agency. - For further information, please contact the Tribunal at: PH: (617) 373-3003 Web Site; www.MIchigan.govitaxtribunal E-mail: taxtrib@Michigan.gov TT262 Revised 01/05 1973 PA 186, As Amended
Page 11
Addendum to Property Tax Appeal Keith and Barbara Van Tubergen, 13091 Sikkema Dr., Grand Haven, M149417 Parcel No: 62-01-28-100-008 - 11191 White Oaks Lane, Bitely, Michigan Statement of Facts Petitioners purchased the Premises in September 2013 and have used this as a second home since that time. It consisted of approximately 16 acres, a double wide manufactured home, an accessory structure (used to be a cabin and was then used as an unattached garage) and a Pole Barn. It has always been used as a gathering place for their family with its primary use being a hunting camp. The manufactured home was situated approximately a half mile from the road and was accessed by a private driveway (shared with others) that is secured by a gate that is usually locked. There is no mailbox for the Premises nor any of other parcels that use the private drive. On December 1, 2022 there was an electrical fire which caused significant damage to the manufactured home. The insurance company determined the value of the home (the structure) at that time was $104,187.00. It estimated the cost to repair (using licensed contractors) was $129,000.00 it declared a total loss and paid the policy limit plus cost for demolition and ancillary expenses. Petitioners replaced the manufactured home with a new manufactured home that was delivered in the spring of 2023. An occupancy permit was issued approximately June 1, 2023. The purchase price for the new manufactured home was $128,375.00 plus, delivery, site preparation and hookup. The 2024 Notice of Assessment states: PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the CURRENT CHANGE PRIOR AMOUNT 2024 year by approximately: ) TENTATIVE FROM PRIOR year by app 4 $4,454 YEAR: 2023 AMOUNT YEAR TO YEAR: 2024 CURRENT YEAR 1. TAXABLE VALUE: 45,777 143,963 98,186 2. ASSESSED VALUE: 63,000 160,800 87 800 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 1.000 4, STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 63,000 150,800 | 87,800 5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in2023 WAS NOT 6. Assessor Change Reason: Mobile Home Added, Mobile Home Removed
Page 12
The Appeal argued it was unlawful to increase the taxable value by a multiple of 3.23 because property taxes may increase by the lesser of inflation or 1.05 whichever is less, minus subtractions and plus additions. (See THE GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ACT MCL 211.27a et seq). Property shail be assessed at 50% of its true cash value. (See MCL 211.27a(1). The “taxable value of each parcel of property is the lesser of the following: (a) The property's taxable value in the immediately preceding year minus any losses, multiplied by the lesser of 1.05 or the inflation rate, plus all additions...., (b) The property's current state equalized valuation.” See MCL 211.27a(2). The legislature intentionally did not allow an Assessor to increase taxes for a remodel where a homeowner updated his or her home. This means that if the home were refurbished by tearing down to the studs and starting over there would be no increase. The Board of Review issued a Decision where it reduced the Assessed Value and the SEV to $100,000.00; increasing the property taxes by more than 2 times. This notice was not sent fo Petitioners or their attorneys. It was mailed to 11191 N. White Oaks Lane (the location of the structure) where there is no mailbox nor is there anyone there. All previous tax bills and assessments were delivered to Petitioners primary residence in Grand Haven. Petitioners still have not received a notice in the mail. The Board of Review Decision gave no explanation. Petitioners contacted Casey Guthrie (the individual tasked with performing assessment), and he thought his decision was fair. He viewed this as new construction which increases the taxable value. He simply instructed Petitioners to file an appeal and advised Petitioners had until July 31, 2024 to do so. Argument The increase in taxable value unlawfully uncapped the property taxes. The General Property Tax Act provides that Replacement Construction is not “New Construction.” It does allow for an increase (based upon a price per square foot by assessors manual) for increases in square footage if appropriate. The new manufactured home is larger in footprint; however, it was nearly impossible for Petitioners to obtain a 3-bedroom home (from the manufacturer used by their builder) within the 1200 square foot parameter. Moreover, the cost to procure the unit was just less than the estimated cost to repair the existing structure. MCL 211.34d (1)(biii) states “New Construction”....“means property not in existence on the immediately preceding tax day and not replacement construction.” Replacement construction is defined as “construction that replaced property damaged or destroyed by accident or act of God and that occurred after the immediately preceding tax day....”
Page 13
additional square footage at $43.28-$48.21 per square foot. That said this would increase the Taxable value form $45,777 to somewhere in the ballpark of $70,000.00. Petitioners still believe this is not fair in light of the equities and limitations imposed when purchasing a replacement structure.
Page 14
tn Oost Ts, THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL L-4400 1019 (Rev, 11-23) Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification ast This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24 (c) and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. FROM: CASEY GUTHRIE PARCEL IDENTIFICATION TROY TWP : -01-28-100- 1958 WALTON ROAD PARCEL NUMBER: 62-01-28-100-008 KINGSLEY, MI 49649 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 11191 N WHITE OAKS LN BITELY, MI 49309 OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION I ——— % Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence™ 00% VAN TUBERGEN KEITH ET UX BARBARA J % Exempt As "Qualified Agricultural Property": 00% BE froma heh 9417-8913 % Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal”: .00% TCL EL CT Le LL pd pen PTL fT % Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal"; 00% Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property": a Yes No Exempt As "Development Property": [1 Yes No LEGAL DESCRIPTION: bo PART N1/2 NW1/4 COM N1/4 COR THS00D 06'16"E 439.64 FT N88D 59' 02"W PARA TO N SEC LINE 1464.61FT N67D 49'32"W 305.11 FT TO FREEMAN CREEK N'LY ALG CRK TO NSEC LINE S88D 59'02"E 1651.20 FT ALG SEC LINE TO POB SEC 28 T16N R14W 16.2 A M/L ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) CURRENT CHANGE FROM The change in taxable value will increase/decrease your tax bill for the 2024 PRIOR AMOUNT year by approximately: $4,454 YEAR: 2023 Tear VE a CORRENTE ven 1. TAXABLE VALUE: _ 45,777 143,963 98,186 2. ASSESSED VALUE: ) _ 63,000 150,800 87,800 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 1.000 a ik is EAE RE 4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 63,000 150,800 87,800 5. There WAS or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership on this property in2023 WAS NOT 6. Assessor Change Reason: fobile Home Added, Mobile Home | The 2024 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.05 Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classitication may be directed to the Following: Name: Phone: Email Address: CASEY GUTHRIE (231) 350-9123 GUTHRIE8551@GMAIL.COM March Board of Review Appeal Information. The board of review will meet at the following dates and times:
Page 15
04/16/2024 08:54 aM 2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION FROM CASEY GUTHRIE TROY TWP 1958 WALTON ROAD KINGSLEY, MI 49649 NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address and legal description optional.). 62-01-28-100-008 11191 N WHITE OAKS REN KEI THB ARBARA i PART N1/2 NW1/4 COM N1/4 COR THS00D 0616" 439.64 FT BITELY MI 49309 N88D 59 02"W PARA TO N SEC LINE 1464.61FT N67D 49'32"W 305.11 FT TO FREEMAN CREEK N'LY ALG CRK TO NSEC LINE $88D 59'02"E 1651.20 FT ALG SEC LINE TO POB SEC 28 TI6N R14W 16.2 AM/L "HIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary to compute your assessment and taxable value. The Board has completed their review of parcel number 62-01-28-100-008 They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. Board of Review Comments: THE TROY TOWNSHIP MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW LOWERED THE ASSESSED & TAXABLE VALUES 2024 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 150,800 | 2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 100,000 (If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 2024 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 143,963 2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 100,000 2024 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 0.0000 Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions, “Effective March 1, 2013, the Tribunal is no longer able to accept Small Claims letter appeals. Rather, you are required to file a petition to initiate a new Small Claims appeal. Petition forms are available on this website.” http://www.michigan.gov/taxtrib/0,4677,7-187-38254---,00.htm!
Page 16
Van Tubergen, Treutle 14 N. Third Grand Haven, MICHIGAN TAX T PO BOX 30 LANSING, MI