scanswer_valuation.pdf
Gregory G Williams Petitioner V Township Of Green Oak Respondent · 26-001153-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001153 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of Green Oak (LIVINGSTON) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Christina M.I. L Last Name Yaeger Firm Name (if any) Township of Green Oak Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 10001 Silver Lake Rd Brighton City or Town MI State Michigan ZIP Code 48116 Telephone Number 810-231-1333 E-mail Address christina.yaeger@greenoaktwp.com Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? Yes
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner's property and established its taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional requirements. The average level of assessment in relation to true cash value in the assessment district is 50%. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegation that the assessed value of its property, as equalized, is a factor other than 50% and also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property's taxable value is improper. The True Cash Value reflected for the subject property on the assessment roll was established based on arms-length transactions that occurred from 4/1/2023 through 3/31/2025. CAPPED VALUE FORMULA: 2026 Taxable Value Calculation = 2025 TV $355,000 x CPI 1.027 = 2026 TV $364,585. Reference Michigan State Tax Commission Bulletin 14 of 2025 attached, 2026 Capped Value Formula. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped? Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 4716-16-415-015 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 369000 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 364585 What do you believe is the fair market value? 738000 What do you believe is the taxable value? 11585 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Christina L Yaeger Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/