answer 26-002507.pdf
Steven Jarabek, Kari Jarabek Petitioners V Township Of Taymouth Respondent · 26-002507-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
Ci E STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002507 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Unit of Government Township Of Taymouth Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 4343 Birch Run Rd City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Birch Run Mi =e Telephone Number: 989-624-4 1 59 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): d Representative’s Contact Information Last Name: MacDermaid Legacy Assessing Services Inc. Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorize First Name: M.L: Kevin Firm Name (if any): Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): PO Box 489 City or Town: State: ZIP Code: Fenton Mi 48430 Telephone Number: 8 1 0 750 1 660 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): legacyassessing@gmail.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. Oves [J No #4 NotApplicable Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? [4] Yes OJ No
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Assessment does not exceed 50% of true cash value. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [mn] No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March O July [| December If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [i] Yes [0] No If yes, cite the Board's authority. Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [_] Yes No If yes, explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? J ves No If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? Section 6: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. percettumeer 27-10-5-33-2001-003 Classification of Property: Real Personal [J (check one) Agricultural (J Commercial J Industrial [J Residential @ Timber-Cutover J Developmental [J Utility (J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: 165 §00 208,200 \ BR What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 511,600 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) 255,800 assessed value) 208,200 Signature required Respondent or Attorney/Authorjzed Representative’s Signature: Isl ( Nw