Full record / Gregg.pdf

Gregg.pdf

Daniel T Gregg, Petitioner V Township Of Brighton, Respondent · 25-002500-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

MAY 27 2025 

MICHIGA 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

N TAX TRIBUNAL 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Name 

[J 

Last Name/Company Name 

Laie 

TT 

CREEL 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

S107 White osk 

(ANE 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

BRi&H ren! 

m) 

481¢ 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

B10 

229 

gsuyz 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you 

want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

DSREEL 02 STL GHTLVAY, (07) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

I 

First Name 

M.I. 

Last Name 

Same 

AS ABove 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcels areyou | [T] vest 

[] No** 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check 

all that apply) 

[J True Cash and Taxable Value 

[OJ Poverty Exemption 

bd Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[J Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[J Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

[J Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a 

[O Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

PROJET] ois 

pulchpsws Fr 2020 Fok 7389 oc] 

Bor 7 o4ly ppc 

en BR TF 260,000“ #7 

Thar TIE, 

| 

HFTER 

we 

Lo 

ple7%2 

THe 

ADD 

J 770 of B20 <a rr 

we 

HAD 

gNOThes ALPCHAL s= Fes )2s pnd 

Ae 

Valve wis shown 4s £589 0007 

ConpRROBIC. PROPERTIES ARE FN That SIME value Ene» 

Zillow £sr 1S BSED, 000, 60 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing: 

2025 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? pf Yes 

[Hl] No 

If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: JX March 

O July 

O December 

If No, check the applicable reason(s): 

O Not required to attend 

[] Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

Od Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

[] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identifica jon Number: 

H7172 “2Y-/00- 030 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

0 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

eR 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

$327,400 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

‘ 

TT 

0) 

258,708 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

SEO 000 

“* 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and erffer here. This is your contention of Assessed Value, 

280, 00H « 

If you believe the Taxable Vals differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

\ 2,09 2% 

Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel Identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

[] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you believe is the property’s classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

a 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Ifimproved property, how is the property currently being used? 

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

I] ves 

OO no 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

O Yes 

[J 

No 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. 

If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above, 

If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Signature *required 

Pa 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized R 

ssentativepSignature: 

Isl 

ra 

/ 

PZ

Page 5

File No. 250225 

APPRAISAL OF 

LOCATED AT: 

5107 WHITE OAK LN 

BRIGHTON, MI 48114 

CLIENT: 

DAN GREGG 

5107 WHITE OAK LN 

BRIGHTON, MI, 48114 

. 

AS OF: 

February 24, 2025 

CO 

,

Page 6

File No. 250225 

DAN GREGG 

DAN GREGG 

5107 WHITE OAK LN 

BRIGHTON, Mi, 48114 

File Number: 

250225 

In accordance with your request, 

| have appraised the real property at: 

5107 WHITE OAK LN 

BRIGHTON, MI 48114 

The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of the defined value of the subject property, as improved. 

The property righls appraised are the fee simple interes! in the sile and improvements. 

In my opinion, the defined value of Lhe property as of 

February 24, 2025 

ts: 

$559,000 

Five Hundred Fifty-Nine Thousand Dotiars 

The atlached report contains the description, analysis and supportive data for the conclusions, 

final opindon of value, descriptive photographs, assignment conditions and appropriale certifications. 

Dp (LD 

em 

Jeffrey H DiMicell

Page 7

Residential Appralsal Report 

File No. 250225 

The purpose of this appraisal report Is to provide the client vith a credible ‘opinion of Ihe defined value of the subject property, given the Intended use of Ihe appraisal. 

Client Name/intended User DAN GREGG 

E-mail N/A 

a Cllont Addtess 

5107 WHITE QAK LN 

Clly BRIGHTON 

Slate Mi 

Zip 48114 

fi Additonal Intended User(s) NONE 

[3 

Intended Use MARKET VALUE 

Property Address 5107 WHITE OAK LN 

Cly BRIGHTON 

State MI 

Zip 48114 

Io Owner of Public Record DAN /BRENDA GREGG 

County LIVINGSTON 

fl Legal Description See Attached Addendum 

Fi Assessar's Parcel §_12-34-100-030 

Tax Year 2024 

RE. Taxes $ 5004.38 

B neighborhood Mame BRIGHTON TWP 

tap Reference X-18 

Census Tract 7408.00 

Properly Righls Appraised 

[X]Fee Simple 

[J Leasehold 

[J other (describe) 

My research | Jdig_[X)did nc reveal any prior sales of iansfers of the subjoct propesly for the three years pris bo the effective dale of hs appraisal. 

prior SalelTiansler: 

Dale 

Price 

Sources) 

alps of pio 216 0 aster sory ofthe subject properly (and oreparabl ses applicaie) 

ACCORDING 10 REALGOMPONLINE PUBLIC RECORDS DATA, 

J THERE WERE NO PREVIOUS RANSFERS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITHIN THE PAST 36 MONTHS AND THE COMPARABLE SALES 

£1 WITHIN THE PAST 12 MONTHS. 

Offerings, options and conlracts as of the elfective date of Ihe appraisal 

“Nelghborhood Characteristics 

PERE 

Es 

> One:Unit Housing Trends 

BR 

‘Ofg-Unlt HousIng. 

‘presen Land Use% 

Location 

Urban, 

XJ Suburban 

Rural 

Properly Yatues 

{X)increasing 

Stable 

)Deckning 

PRICE 

AGE 

One-Unit 

88% 

Bulll-Up 

{Xj0ver 75% 

25-75% 

Under 25% | DemandiSuppty 

(XShorlage 

In Betance [J Over Supply | 

${000) 

{yrs} 

2-4 Unit 

1% 

Growth {J Rapid 

Stable 

Stow 

Marketing Time 

{XJUnder mths 

_{_J3-6 mths 

Over 6 mihs. 

250 Low 

+ | Wutt-F amity 

0% 

Neighborhood Boundaries See Attached Addendum 

1,000 High 

120 | Commercial 

1% 

450 Pred. 

35| 

Other Vacant 

10% 

Neighborhood Description 

The subject is focated in an established residential area comprised primarily of single family homes. Area homes are a mix of new. 

2; designs with some older 

of varied construction quality, condition, utility and design. The subject is wilhin convenient distance to all the necessary amenilies such 

[€] as highways, schools, parks, shopping and is adequalely prolected by police and fire deparlments. 

Tho private road is common for the area and has no sifect on appeal or marketablity. 

Markel Conditions (cluding support for the above conclusions) 

See Allached Addendum 

Dimensions 189 X 330 

Area 1.43 Ac 

Shape RECTANGULAR 

View RESDNTLWDS 

Specific Zaning Classtication R-2 

Zoning Description SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 

Zoning Compliance 

___JLeqal 

_(_ ] Legal Nonconforming (Grandiathered Use) 

Ino zoning 

(_Jilegel {eserlbe) 

1s he Nighest and best use of he sublecl property as improved {or a5 proposed per plans od specications) te presetuse? 

(J 

Yes (Tio 

to. describe. 

Ulitities 

Public 

Other (describe) 

public 

Other (describe) 

Off-silelmprovements—Type 

Public 

Private 

Elocirichty 

Waler 

Street ASPHALT 

Gas 

Sanitary Sever 

[I] 

Aley 

NONE 

[DN] 

Site Comments 

THIS SITE 8 TYPICAL FOR THE AREA IN TERMS OF SIZE AND APPEAL, NO APPARENT EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS 

WERE OBSERVED AT THE TIME THE APPRAISAL WAS CONDUCTED. 

GENERAL DESCRIPTION 

FQUNDATION 

EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION 

males. 

INTERIOR 

maleitals 

Gans [Xone [Jone whee. uit {J 

[Jcomsosay( 

JCowispace 

{Foundation walls 

CONCRETE 

Floots 

CROTIWD 

4 of Slorles 

1.5 

[x Trun Basement 

Partial Basement _| Exterior Walls 

BRICK, STONE WD 

{Walls 

DRYWALL 

Type 

X)oet 

[Jat 

[JS DeliEng Ul 

| Basement Area 

2008.6480 50.1. | Roof Surface 

ASPHALT 

TrmiEhish 

STAIN 

Tx) existing 

JProposed(JUnder Const. | Basement Finish 

70% Gulers 

& Downspouts ALUMINUM 

Bath floor 

CERAMIC 

Design (Siyle) CONTEMPORARY. 

TJ oulside Enry/Entl__ 

LX) Sump Pump | Winds Type 

CASEMENT 

Bah Walnscol CRMO/INSURT 

Year Bull 1991 

Siom Sastilnsulaled INSULATED 

Car Storage 

_{_INone 

Elfective Age (115) 15 

Screens 

YES 

(XJ oiveyay 

_#oiCais 

4 

Al 

T_Jnone 

eating 

LOFWAL Jw 

| (_JRadiant] Amenities 

WondStovels) £0 

| Driveway Surface ASHPLT/CONG 

Jem Stal 

Stales 

Clother 

[uci Gas 

X] Fireplace(s) 1 

Fence 0 

XJ Gorage 

_FofCars_2 

Floor 

Scuttle 

Cootng LK) Centra Alt Condltioning 

XJ patio/Deck 2 

Porch 

1 

carport 

___# of Cars. 

other 

Pool 0 

XJoter P BARN 

|X) 

[oe 

[Jain

Page 8

Residential Appraisal Report 

File Ho, 250225 

FEATURE 

[ 

SUBJECT 

COMPARABLE SALE NO. 

1 

COMPARABLE SALE NO. 2 

COMPARABLE SALE NO. 

3 

5107 WHITE OAK LN 

5095 VAN AMBERG RD 

10687 ARBOUR DR 

2561 SPRING FAWN TRAIL 

Address BRIGHTON, Mt 48114 

BRIGHTON, Mi 48114 

BRIGHTON, MI 48114 

BRIGHTON, Mi 48114 

Proximity 

lo Subject 

0.36 miles NW. 

0.95 miles NW. 

0.77 miles NE 

Sale Price 

3 

Is 

645,000 

In 

565.000 

Ts 

540,000 

Salo PriclCross 

Liv. Area 

| $ 

000 sf 

|8 

239.78 sq lL] 

YT 

19564 sa. 

§ 

207.69 sq.ft 

Data Soutce(s) 

INSPECTED 

MLS #:20250005802 

MLS #:20240081974 

MLS #:20240051880 

Vefication Source(s) __| ASSESSOR 

ASSESSOR 

ASSESSOR 

ASSESSOR 

VALUE ADJUSTMENTS 

DESCRIPTION 

DESCRIPTION 

+63 $ Adjustment 

DESCRIPTION 

+) $ 

Adshment 

DESCRIPTION 

{4 

Adshmetd 

Sle or Financing 

GONV/DOM:4 

VAIDOM:141 

CONVIDOM:49 

Concessions 

NONE NOTED 

NONE NOTED 

NONE NOTED 

Date of Salef¥ime 

02/20/2025 

[0110/2025 

0112/10/2024 

0 

Location 

SUBURBAN 

SUBURBAN 

SUBURBAN 

SUBURBAN 

LeasehaidiFes Simple__| 

FEE SIMPLE 

FEE SIMPLE 

FEE SIMPLE 

FEE SIMPLE 

Sle 

143A¢ 

148 Ac 

04240 

10,100 

[2.0 Ac 

5,700 

View 

RESDNTUWDS __| RESDNTLANDS 

RESDNTLMWDS 

RESONTLAVDS 

M 0:5 (Sie) 

1.5 GONTEMP 

1.5 CONTEMP 

1.5 CONTEMP 

2 CAPE 

0 

[8] uatty of Construction 

1 GOCD 

VERY GOOD 

-64,500| 60D 

GOOD 

1% Actual Age 

34 Yrs 

34 Yrs 

31Yrs 

ol54 

0 

EX Condition 

S000 

GOOD 

felalels] 

GOOD 

Rd Above Grade 

Tot |Bms) 

Baths 

| Toi [Bos] 

Baths 

7,500 | Toa [ams] 

bans 

Total [ams] 

wavs 

7,600 

b Room count 

§ 

3] 

21 

jtwi4] 

24 

olo 

3] 

21 

ols 

4] 

21 

0 

[24 Gross ving vea'54.00 

2,590 50.1 

2.600 sqft 

15,400 

2,888 sq.1, 

16,100 

2,600 sq.ft 

0 

< fasement & Finished 

Fulli70% Finished 

Full Basement 

+28,112 | FuliB0% Finished 

-2,000 | Full Basement 

+28,112 

Ie] Rooms Beton Grade 

| REC /FLEXRM 

| UNFINISHED 

0 Recitibth flex rm 

0] UNFINISHED 

9 

FE Functional Uity 

AVERAGE 

AVERAGE 

AVERAGE 

AVERAGE 

Fi Heating/Cooling 

GAS FWA CiAir 

GAS FWA CAI 

GAS FWA ClAir 

GAS FWA CAI 

Energy Elficient flems 

FURNC/WNDWS 

FURNC/WNDWS 

FURNC/WNDWS 

FURNC/WNDWS 

GarageiCarpoi! 

2 ATT GAR 

2 ATT GAR 

3 ATT GAR 

-5,000]2 ATT GAR 

ParchyPatiofDeck 

PORGH/DECK(2) 

| PRCHIPTO/IDCK 

0] PORGIDECK(2) 

PORGHIDECK 

+2500 

Amenities 

FP 

EP 

FP 

1FiP 

Exterior Features 

| P BARN 

NONE 

+10,000 [NONE 

+10,000 | NONE 

+10,000 

Nel Adpisient (Tolz) 

OO 

&E 

Is 

39.288] 

[1+ 

CIs 

5,000 

COs 

21412 

Adjusted Sale Price 

Nel Ad]. 

6.1% 

het Adj 

4.1% 

NetAdj. 

51% 

of Comparables 

GussAg. 

179% 

!s 

605,712 | GossAd. 

8.2%|5 

559,000 | Gross Adi 

10.0% 

1% 

567,412 

Summary of Sales Comparison Approach 

See Attached Addendum 

Indlcaled Value by Sales Comparison Approach § 559,000 

See Attached Addendum 

Seem lds snd echmiques amplojed ncuding teason fo excluding an approach ovale, 

Soo Allached Addendum 

The Cost Approach was considered, however, due to the difficulty of accurately measuring accumulated depreciation, the Cost Approach was deemed nol 

necessary lo provide a credible result for 1his analysis. 

The income approach was not considered, due lo tack of reliable data. 

Reconciialion comments: 

See Altached Addendum

Page 9

Residential Appraisal Report 

File No, 250225 

FEATURE 

I 

SUBJECT 

COMPARABLE SALE NO. 4 

COMPARABLE SALL HO, § 

COMPARABLE SALENO.S | 

5107 WHITE OAK LN 

10257 WINSTED LN 

Address BRIGHTON, 

Mi 48114 

BRIGHTON, Ml 48114 

Proxinily 10 Subject 

1.66 miles NW. 

Sale Price 

s 

s 

500,000 

s 

s 

Sale Price/Gross 

Lv. Area | $ 

000 sq.ft 

{$ 

22563 sg. 

- 

s 

se.t 

I 

sq.ft 

Data Source(s) 

INSPECTED 

RCOL 120240032448,00M 2 

Veriication Source(s) 

| ASSESSOR” 

| ASSESSOR 

VALUE ADJUSTMENTS 

DESCRIPTION 

DESCRIPTION 

13 Atma 

DESCRIPTION 

+38 

Ment 

DESCRIPTION 

28 

Agent 

Sale of Financing 

a 

Armith 

Concessions 

© 

Conv 

Date of Sale/Tme 

06/01/2024 

+15,000 

Location 

SUBURBAN 

N;Res: 

LeaseholdiFee Simple 

| FEE SIMPLE 

FEE SIMPLE 

site 

1.43 Ac 

131ac 

0 

view 

RESONTLWDS __ | BiRes;Woods 

Design (Syie) 

1.6 CONTEMP 

DTZ:COLONIAL 

0 

Quali of Consttuction__| 

GOOD. 

Go0D 

Actual Age 

34 Yrs 

6 

[3 

Condition. 

coon 

GOOD 

Above Grate 

tos ogms] 

ams 

{vou [noms] 

ean 

15.000 

[Tot [osems] 

avs 

Toi [Bs] 

tans 

Room Count 

83 

24 

95] 

24 

0° 

Goss Ling Avea’54,00 

2.590 sq. 

2,216 sq. 

20,200 

sgh 

sg. 

Basement & Finished 

| Full70% Finished 

| 50% FBsmntCrawt 

+15,600 

Rooms Below Grade ____| REC /[FLEXRM 

| REC RM 

0 

Functional Utlty 

AVERAGE 

AVERAGE 

Healing/Caoling 

GAS FWA CIAIC 

| GAS FWA ClAir 

Energy Eficlent lems 

| FURNCAVNDWS | FURNCAWNDWS 

GaagelCargort 

2 ATT GAR 

2 ATT GAR 

PorcivPatipDerk 

PORCH/DECK(Z] _| PORGH/DECK 

+2500 

Amenllies 

1 FIP 

1FP 

Exterior Features 

P BARN 

P BARN 

MB ct simen (Fold) 

OO 

1s 

aza00| 

Lr 

(J- 

1s 

O 

Ob 

B23 Adjusted Salo Price 

| 

Nel Ad). 

8.5% 

el Adj. 

% 

Nel Adj. 

% 

I 

GrossAd. 

14.5% 

[§ 

542,300 | Gross Ad, 

%|3 

Gross Adi, 

%ls 

1 Summary of fos Comparison Approach _ See Attached Addendum

Page 10

Residential Appraisal Report 

File No. 250225 

Scope of Work, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 

Scope of work Is defined in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice as * the type and exlent of research and analyses nan 

assignment.” In short, scope of work Is simply what the appraiser did and didnot do during the course of the assignment. lt includes, but is not 

fimiled to: he extent to which the properly is Identified and Inspected, the type and extent of data researched, the lype and extent of analyses applied 

to arrive al opinions or conclusions. 

The scope of this appralsat and ensuing discussion in this report are specific to the needs of the client, other identified intended users and tothe 

Intended use of the report. This reporl was prepared for the sole and exclusive use of lhe client and olher identified Intended users for the Identified 

intended use and Its use by any other parlies [s prohibited. The appraiser Is nol rasponsible for unauthorized use of the report. 

he appraiser's cerlification appearing In this appraisal report is subject to the fofiovlng conditions and to such other specific condillons as are 

set forth by lhe appraiser In the report. All extraordinary assumptions and hypothelical conditions are slated in the report and might have affected the 

asslgnment results. 

1 

Vhe appraiser assumes no sespansioity fo mallers of 1 fegal naure affciing the properly appraised o til there, nor dows Ure appralser render any opinion as 0 the fl, whichis 

assumed to be god and marketable The property is appraised as though under responsibte ownership 

2. Any skelch in this report may show approximate dimensions and Is included only lo assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraiser has made no survey of the property. 

3 The appralser Is nol required to glee lestmony of apps In court because of havhig made tha appraisal ith reference o he property In qusslion, uress arrangements have been 

previously made hereto. 

4. Neither all, nor any parl of the content of (his report, capy of other media thereof {including conclusions as lo the properly value, the idenllly of Ihe appraiser, professional designations, 

the frm ith which the apgralser Is connecled), shall be usec for any purposes by anyone bul he cllent and other nlended users as denied I fis reporl nor shafl it be conveyed by 

anyone to the public trough advertising. public clalons, news, sales, o other media, vithout the witen consent of the apprafser. 

& Tho appraiser vill nol disclnse Ihe contents of (is appralsal report unless feud by applicable few of as speciled inthe Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Praclice. 

5. 

Informalion, asimales, and opinions furnished to (he appraiser, and contained nthe feporl, sere obtained rom sources considered refiabte and belleved lo be true and cortect. 

Hoviever, wo responsibil for accuracy of such ems furnished to the appralser s assumed by the appraiser. 

7. The appraiser assumes hak here are tio hidden of unapparent condiions of the propery, Subsoll of structures, whlch would render § more of less valuable. The appralsef assumes 

to cesponsiitly for such conditions, of fo engineering o esting, which might be fequied fo discover such factors. Ths appraisal i nol an environmental assessment of the property and 

should not be considered as such. 

5, The appraiser specializes i the valuation of real property and is nol a hore spect, bing cansacor, truclyal engineer, of sila “expel, unless othenidse noted, The apprlser 

did not conduct the Intensive type of fietd obsetvations of the kind intended lo seck and discover properly defects. The viewing of the properly and any iniprovements is for giusposes of 

developing an opinion of the defined value of the property. given the Intended use of Ils assignmenl. Statements regarding condition are based on surface observations only. The 

appraiser claims no special expertise regarding issues including, but not imited to: foundation settlement, basement molsture problems, wood destroying (or other) insects, pest infestation, 

tadon gas, lead based palnl, mold of environmental Issues. Unless othenvise indicaled, mechanical syslems were not activaled or tested. 

This appralal repost should not be sed to disclose th condion of the property asl relates fo he presencelabscnce of defects. The cents Inviled and encouraged to employ qualified 

experls to Inspec! and address areas of concer. 

If negalive conditions ate discoveted, the opintan of value may be affected. 

Unless otherwise noled, the appraiser assumes the components thal constitute the subject property improvemant(s) are fundamentally sound and in 

working order. 

Any viewing of the property by ihe appraiser was lined lo eadily abservable areas. Unless athens noted, acs and craw space areas were nol accessed. The appraiser did not move 

furniture, loa coverings of oiher items thal may restrct Ihe viewing of the properly. 

5. Appraisals valving hypothetical condilns elated 1 completion of es construction, ropais of aterfian are based on the assur that sch completion, alterallon of repairs vil 

be competently performed 

10. Unless the Intended use of this appraisat specifically Includes issues of properly Insurance coverage, this appraisal shuld not be used for such purposes. Reproduction of 

Replacement cosl ures used i ths cos! approach are for valuation purposes only. given ihe intended use of (he assignment. The Defition of Value used In 1s assignment Is unlikely 

(0 be consistent with lhe definfion of Insurable Value for properly Insurance coveragefuse. 

11. The ACI General Purpose Appraisal Report (GPAR™) is nol Infended for use in transactions that require 

3 Fannie Mae 1004/Freddie Mag 70 form, 

also known as the Unlform Residential Appralsal Report (URAR). 

Additional Comments Related To Scope Of Work, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions

Page 11

Residential Appraisal Report 

File No. 250225 

Appraisers Certification 

The appralser(s) cerlifies hat, te the best of the appraisers knowledge and beffe: 

1. 

The statements of fact contained In [hs reporl are fru and correct, 

2. The reported analyses. opiiens, and conclusions are Iied only by Ihe teporied assumptions and ming condiions and are the appralser’s personal, Imparlial, and unbiased 

professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 

3. Unless otherwise slated, the appraiser bas no present of prospective Interest ia the prapely What is the subject of tis reporl and has na personal interes! wih respect to the parlies 

volved. 

4. 

The appraiser has no bias with respect to the properly thal is the subject of this report ar to the parties Involved wilh Ibis assignment. 

5. The appraiser's engagement in his assignment was not coningen! upon developing of reporing predetermined tesulls. 

¢. The appialser's compensation or completing is assigning 5 nok contingent upon Ihe development or repatling of a prodetermined value or direction in vale that avors (he cuss of 

he client, Ihe amount of the value opinion, the altainment of a stipulated resull of he occurrence of a subsequent evenl directly elated 10 the intended use of this appraisal 

7. 

The appralser's analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed. and this report has ‘been prepared, In conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 

8. Unless otherwise noted, the appraiser has made a personal Inspection of the praperty thal is the subject of this seport. 

9. Unless noted below, 10 one provided significa real properly appraisal assistance o the appraiser signing his certcaflon. Significant real property appraisal assistance provided by. 

| have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period 

immediately preceding acceplance of this assignment. 

Additional Certifications: 

Dofinitionof Value: 

~~ (X)Market Value 

[J Other Value: 

Source of Definition: 

ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISED: 

5107 WHITE OAK LN 

BRIGHTON, Mi 48114 

EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE APPRAISAL: 02/24/2025 

APPRAISED VALUE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY $ 558,000 

APPRAISER 

SUPERVISORY APPRAISER 

Signature: re Dp Lm 

Signalure: 

Name: Jofffey 

H Ditticeti 

Hae: 

Company Name; NEW CENTURY APPRAISALS, LLC 

Company Name:

Page 12

ADDENDUM 

Client: DAN GREGG 

File No.: 250225 

Property Address: 5107 WHITE OAK LN 

Case No; 

City: BRIGHTON 

State: ML 

Zip: 48114 

Purpose and Intended Use of the Appraisal 

The purpose of the appraisal is 10 provide an opinion of market vaiue of the subject property on behalf of the appraiser 

facilitating the assignment for the referenced client as the intended user of the report, "The intended user of this 

appraisal report is the client. No additional intended users are identified by the appraiser. This report contalns 

sufficient Information to enable the client to understand the report. Any other party receiving a copy of this report 

for any reason is not an intended user; nor does receiving a copy of this report result in an appraiser-client 

relationship. Use of this report by any party(ies) is not intended by the appraiser. 

The intended use is to evaluate the property that is the subject of this appraisal for market value, subject to the 

stated scope of work, purpose, reporting requirements, and definition of market value." 

Scope (Extent) of Work 

The appraisal is based on the information gathered by the appraiser from an interior and exterior inspection of the subject 

property, Public Recaras Data, Realcumponling & MLXeahnge Multipto Listing Sorvicas, Lacal Tax Assessor Records. 

SEMCOG, and other identified sources, including inspection of the subject's nelghborhood, and selection of comparable 

sales, lislings, and/or rentals within the subject market area. The subject was measured from the exterior and a sketch is 

inctuded in this report. The comparables were inspected from the public street. | not viewable from street MLS photo's 

provide a view of comparable at time of listing. The original source of lhe comparables is shown in the Data Source section 

of the market grid along with the source of confirmation, if available. The original source is presented first. The sources and 

data are considered reliable. When conflicting information was provided, the source deemed most reliable has been used. 

Data believed lo be unreliable was not included in the report nor used as a basis for the value conclusion. 

Title Report 

A title report was not supplied by the fender when the appraisal was ordered, 

At the time of inspection, a title report was not 

provided as well, therefore, one could not be reviewed to confirm ownership of the subject properly. 

After reviewing public 

records data, if accurale, the owner of the subject property is stated on the front page of this report. 

Legal Description 

SEC 34 T2N R6E COMM AT N 1/4 COR, THW 660 FT, TH S 471 FT TO POB, TH S 188 FT, THW 330 FT, THN 189 FT, THE 330 FT 

TO POB 1.43AC MAL 

Neighborhood Boundaries 

THE SUBJECT NEIGHBORHOOD IS BOUNDED BY SPENCER RD TO THE NORTH, 1-96 TO THE SOUTH,PLEASANT VALLEY RD TO 

THE EAST AND U$-23 TO THE WEST 

. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE BRIGHTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT. 

ITS MARKETING AREA 1S NEWMAN RD TO THE NORTH 

, 1-96 TO THE SOUTH, KENSINGTON RD TO THE EAST AND US-23 TO 

THE WEST. 

Comments on Sales Comparison 

After a thorough search of the subject property's general market area, the appraiser utilized four similar sales from nearby 

competing properties to complete this analysis. 

All comparable sales are similar and proximale. All were considered to be 

the best sales available at the time of this analysis. 

Comparable # 4 exceeds FNMA 

1 mile radius guideline due to limiled similar sale this has no effect on marketability. 

Based on a 12 months comparable search criteria comp that A 3% adjusiment was made to sale that contract date occurred 

6 month’ or iater from effective date of report, and recent comp's that are 3 month's or earlier no adjustment was warranted, 

based on market data. Site adjustments were made at $10,000 an acre based on land sales in the subject market area, A 

10% quality adjustment was made per UAD qualily difference. No age adjustment was made if warranted adjustment was 

made under condition. Gross Living Area adjustments were made at $54.00 per square foot (unless the GLA Is 100 square 

feet or less as compared to the subject). A basement adjustment was made at $10.00 per square foot and $20.00 per 

finished square foot after 100 feet difference. No adjustment was made to rooms below grade. 

The first comparable is a recent sale from the subject's market area. 

It reportedly sold in similar overall condition and was 

selected for its similar design, age, proximity and market appeal. 

The second comparable is a recent sale from the subject's market area. 

It reportedly sold in similar overall condition and 

was selecled for its similar design, age, proximity, utility and market appeat. 

The third comparable is a recent sale from the subject's market area. 

It reportedly sold in similar overall condition and was 

selected for its similar size, age, proximity and market appeal. 

The fourth comparable is a recent sale from the subject's market area. 

It reportedly sold in similar overall condition and was 

seecled for its similar 

age, proximity and market appeal.

Page 13

ADDENDUM 

Client: DAN GREGG 

File No.. 260225 

Properly Address: 5107 WHITE QAK LN 

Case No. 

Cily: BRIGHTON 

State: MI 

Zip: 48114 

The digilal photos have in no way been altered or modified. 

The signatures on this appralsal are digital signatures, which are computer generated and printed on the report. The 

appraisal was electronically transmitted to our office. The appraiser's signature is secured by a password which only the 

appraiser has access to. 

If any modifications were made on this appraisal, the signature would be eliminated. This form of 

Certification has been approved by The Appraisal Foundation, located at 1029 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Suite 900, 

Washington D.C., 20006-3517. The Appraisal Foundation is authorized by Congress as the Source of Appraisal Standards 

and Appraiser Qualifications. This approval can be found in the Statement on Appraisal Standards number 8 (SMT-8) on 

Electronic Transmission of Reports. The section regarding signed certification reads as follows: 

Any software program used to electronically lransfer a report must provide, al minimum, a digital signature 

security feature for all appraisers singing a report, The appraiser(s) should ensure lhe signature(s) are protected and that 

only the appraiser(s) maintain control of the signature. This control may be maintained by password (e.g. PIN numbers), 

hardware devices (e.g. secure cards) or other means. 

Electronically affixing a signature to a report carries the same {evel of 

authenticity and responsibility as an ink signature on a paper copy report, 

Disclaimer 

The appraiser is nol a professional home inspector and has not performed a dolailsd hemo inspection of the subjanl 

property such as physically viewing the attic, crawl space or any other hidden or inaccessible areas, etc. 

All building 

services and equipment appeared operable and free of defects at the time of inspection (unless otherwise noted), however, 

the appraisal should not be relied upon as the primary source for determining the condition and safety of the subject 

property. tis the responsibility of all interested parties to have their own detaited property inspection by a professional 

property inspector to defermine the condition and safety of the subject property, The value indicated assumes that there are 

no hidden deficiencies which would render the subject property less value, 

The appraiser notes, the use of the term “inspection” as it relates throughout the contents of this appraisal report is 

synonymous with the term "observe and/or observation” and is not to be confused with a detailed inspection performed by a 

professional home inspector. 

UAD Disclaimer 

At the request of the client, this appraisal report has been prepared in compliance with the Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) 

from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The UAD requires the appraiser to use standardized responses that include specific 

formats. definitions, abbreviations, and acronyms. 

The appraiser altempled to obtain an adequate amount of information in the normal course of business regarding the subject 

and comparable properties. Some of the standardized responses required by the UAD, especially those which the appraiser 

has not had the opportunity to personally verify or measure, could mistakenly imply greater precision and reliability in the 

data than is faclually correct of typical in the normal course of business. 

Examples include condition and quality ratings, as well as comparable sales and listing data. Not every element of the 

subject property was viewable and comparable sales data was generally obtained from third party sources, i.e. market 

participants such as Listing Brokers, Selling Brokers, MLS data and photo attachments elc. Consequently, this information 

should be considered an “estimate” unless otherwise noted by the appraiser. 

License Information 

in Michigan, appraisers are required to be licensedicertified and are regulated by lhe State of Michigan, Department of 

Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, P. O. Box 30018, Lansing, Mi 48909.

Page 14

DIMENSION LIST ADDENDUM 

Client: 

DAN GREGG 

File No. 

250226 

Property Address; 5107 WHITE OAK LN 

Case No.; 

Cily: BRIGHTON 

State: MI 

Zip; 48114 

GROSS BUILDING AREA (GBA) 

2,590 

GROSS LIVING AREA (GLA) 

2,590 

foeals) 

Area 

% ol GLA | % of GBA 

Living 

2,590 

100.00 

Level 

| 

2071 

79.96 | 

79.95 

Love 2 

518 

20.00 | 

__20.00 

Lovet 3 

0 

0.00 

0.00 

Olher 

0 

0.00 

0.00 

GBA 

Basemenl 

0 

2,009 

Garage 

|] 

Other 

J 

1,778 

Area Measurements 

Area Type 

Measurements 

Factor 

Total 

Level 

Level2 

Level3 

Other | Bsmi. 

Garage 

13.80 

13.00 

100 

= 

179.84 

(mn) 

[1] 

7.50 

1.00 

= 

30.75 

O 

21.20 

1,00 

- 

307.91 

0 

x 

0 

2190 

x 100 

- aes | 

O 

1370 

100 

= 

20 | 

(OO 

29,80 

x _1.00 

= 

2080 | 

(OO 

37.90 

% _ 1.00 

- 

a0257 

| 

(J 

3370 

x _1.00 

- 

76499 

| 

[J 

B70 

x _100 

- 

ass 1 

(J 

2070 

x _1.00 

332.40 

[8] 

oo 

»] 

21.90 

100 

- 

328,50 

11.70 

1.00 

1300 

x _050 

9.00 

0.35 

1.00 

0.50 

4.00 

0.50 

__1000 x _0.50 

8:00 

x 0.35 

200 

x _050 

200 

x _032 

530 

x _050 

3.80 

04 

7.00 

0.29 

X 

xX 

X 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

% 

x 

Xx 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

Xx 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

Xx 

xX 

x 

X 

[3 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

xX 

Gl 

J 

: 

gz 

333434 

 

x 

se 

3 

x mx 

x 

x XK XM am 

a xR 

3 

3 

x 

x 

x XX ox XM Xo 

MM 

x 

3% 

x 

x 

x Xx 

xX 

o> 

= 

=] 

5) 

o00000no000000C000CCC000000C0000000000 

0000000000000Co0CC0000C0000000Cc0000a0onoa 

000d00000CO00C000000000000000000000000080 

CC00000000000000C00000000000000C0000000a00 

0000C0000CO0CC0000000000000000006e

Page 15

SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO ADDENDUM 

Client: 

DAN GREGG 

File No. 

250226 

Property Address: 5107 WHITE OAK LN 

Case No: 

Cily; BRIGHTON 

State: mt 

Zip: 48134 

FRONT VIEW OF 

SUBJECT PROPERTY 

Appraised Dale: February 24, 2025 

Appraised Value: $ 559,000 

REAR VIEW OF 

SUBJECT PROPERTY 

STREET SCENE

Page 16

Client; 

DAN GREGG 

File No.: 

250225 

Properly Address: 6107 WHITE OAKLN 

Case No: 

Cily: BRIGHTON 

State: Ml 

Zip: 48114 

ADDITION 

POLE BARN 

i 

INE 

Nl

Page 17

COMPARABLE PROPERTY PHOTO ADDENDUM 

Client: 

DAN GREGG 

File No; 

250225 

Properly Address: 5107 WHITE OAK LN 

Case No. 

Cily; BRIGHTON 

Slate: MI 

2p: 48114 

COMPARABLE SALE #1 

5096 VAN AMBERG RD 

BRIGHTON, M1 48114 

Sale Dale: 02/20/2025 

Sale Price: $ 645,000 

COMPARABLE SALE #2 

10887 ARBOUR DR 

BRIGHTON, Ml 48114 

Sale Dale: 01/10/2026 

Sale Price: § 665,000 

COMPARABLE SALE #3 

4581 SPRING FAWN TRAIL 

BRIGHTON, MI 48114 

Sale Dale: 12/10/2024

Page 18

COMPARABLE PROPERTY PHOTO ADDENDUM 

Clienl: 

DAN GREGG 

File No. 

250225 

Properly Address: 5107 WHITE QAK LN 

Case No.: 

Clly: BRIGHTON 

Stale: MI 

Zip: 48114 

COMPARABLE SALE #4 

10257 WINSTED LN 

BRIGHTON, MI 48114 

Sale Dale: 06/01/2024 

Sale Price: $ 500,000 

COMPARABLE SALE #5 

Sale Date: 

Sale Price: $ 

COMPARABLE SALE #6 

Sale Date:

Page 19

FLOORPLAN SKETCH 

Client: 

DAN GREGG 

Properly Address: 5107 WHITE OAKLN 

. 

City: BRIGHTON 

State: Ml 

File No: 

Case N 

250225 

Zip: 48114 

wr 

2 Car Atached 

ns 22% 

Area Calculation 

0 33% 

Nonliving Area 

4.120% 

2 Car Altached 

pole Bain’ 

Porch 

Datk 

Deck 

Palio 

Basement

Page 20

LOCATION MAP 

Client, 

DAN GREGG 

Flie No. 

250226 

perly Address: 5107 WHITE OAK LN 

Case Not 

Clly: BRIGHTON 

Stale: mt 

Zip: 48114 

i 

5 

Magdalen 

gs 

Nei 

Comparable Sale 4 

10257 WINSTED LR 

§ 

i BRIGHTON, WI 48114 

i 

€ 

1.65 miles NW 

3 

i 

Comparable Sale 2 

16687 ARBOUR DR 

| BRIGHTON, Mi 48114 

Bigghy | 

Cube Brighton 

& 

Buna id 

Comparabie Sale 

1 

& 

5096 VAN AMBERG RD 

BRIGHTON, MI 48114 

0:36 mites NW 

Comparable Sale 3 

4581 SPRING FAWH TRAIL 

BRIGHTON, Mi 48114 

0.77 miles NE 

7 

Subject 

5107 WHITE DAK LM 

. 

‘BRIGHTON, Mi 4811 

Grand: Risen

Page 21

AERIAL MAP 

Client: 

DAN GREGG 

File No.. 

250225 

Case No.: 

Property Address: 5107 WHITE OAK LN 

Cily: BRIGHTON 

Stale: mi 

Zip: 48114 

4 

Subject 

5107 WHITE OAK LN 

BRIGHTON, M1 $8114

Page 22

Michigan Depariment of Treasury 

Form 618, Page 2 

FOR BOARD OF REVIEW USE ONLY 

INSTRUCTIONS: Incorporate a copy of this form and the assigned number in the Board of Review minutes. 

Parcel Code 

Petition Number 

[) / 0 

4712-34-100-030 

1. ASSESSED VALUE 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

Denied 

Il 

Assessed Value Changed From: 

[ 

ro: 

I 

1] 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board 

7 

Chairperson: Aves 

[7] 

no sa 

Member: 

[A ves 

[] GE 

Member: 

&f ves 

[| 2 

initials _ 

Initials 

TDL Lemedd 

AB. 

Not 

it 

AL 

Doles 

lation prederjocl,gioce N0 260 

If rl 

rr 

the 

Board of A0AL00% 

regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at 

P.0.Box 30232, Lansing, Mi. 48209. Commercial Real, industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be 

ii 

i 

appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber - Cut Over Real, and Agricultural Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed on 

a Michigan Tax Tribunal for or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

2. TENTATIVE TAXABLE VALUE 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

LY 

Denied 

O 

Tentative Taxable Value Changed From: 

To: 

Record of 

Vote - Board or three member committee of board. 

Chairperson: 

[Xf ves 

[1] noZ2=" 

Member. 

[¥] ves 

[] 

Nd 

-E— 

Member 

PX ves 

[7] Wamp 

. 

“Fu 

for Board re 

U Ale 

0D 

Cel 

ee deteo cf 

[YY 

| 

m 

Prop 

if you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at 

P.0.Box 30232, Lansing, Mi. 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, industrial Personal and Utifity Personal Propesty may be 

appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber - Cut Over Real, and Agricultural Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed 

on a Michigan Tax Tribunal for or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

3. CLASSIFICATION 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

M 

Denied 

[ll 

Classification Changed From: 

401 

To: 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board. 

Chairperson: 

[] ves 

[1] 

NO ws 

Member: 

[] ves 

[1] 

NO 

imi 

Member: 

[1 

ves 

[] No Tita 

Reason for Board Action: 

If you disagree with ihe decision of the Board of Review regarding classification, appeal is made by sending Form 2167 to the State Tax Commission, P.O. Box 30471, Lansing, Mi. 48908 by June 30. 

4. QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY EXEMPTION 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

mM 

Exemption Request Denied 

1 

Exemption percent modified from 

% To: 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board. 

%

Page 23

Michigan Depariment of Treasury 

Form 618, Page 2 

FOR BOARD OF REVIEW USE ONLY 

INSTRUCTIONS: Incorporate a copy of this form and the assigned number in the Board of Review minutes. 

Petition Number 

Parcel Code 

0/0 

4712-34-100-030 

1. ASSESSED VALUE 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

Denied 

O 

Assessed Value Changed From: 

I 

Tro: 

[ 

1] 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board 

Chairperson: [7] Ves 

0 

no 27 

Member: 

[A 

ves 

initials 

Reason for Board Action: 

. 

Doce align presenfie ye 

0 

1 

tpn 

(n 

If Ald 

ith 

the decision of the 

Board of Review regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at 

P.0.Box 30232, Lansing, Mi. 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be 

appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber - Cut Over Real, and Agriculturat Personal Properly may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed on 

a Michigan Tax Tribunal for or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunat. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.govitaxtrib. 

Initials 

2, TENTATIVE TAXABLE VALUE 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

N 

Denied 

M 

Tentative Taxable Value Changed From: 

To: 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board. 

) 

a; 

y. 

pee 

4 

HM 

Chairperson: Fi YES 

[] 

no a 

Member. 

[¥] 

ves 

[] 

WN 

nilials 

Member. 

[X ves 

[Jn 

pr 

STU a 

Valle 

uw Coleeleloc] faded 

mtr 

If you disagree wilh the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at 

P.0.Box 30232, Lansing, Mi. 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be 

appealed by May 31. Agricullural Real, Residential Real, Timber - Cut Over Real, and Agricultural Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed 

on a Michigan Tax Tribunal for or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

3. CLASSIFICATION 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

[J 

oenied 

| 

Classification Changed From: 

401 

To: 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board. 

Chairperson; 

[] yes 

[1 

NO wim 

Member: 

[1 Yes 

[1] 

NO mm 

Member. 

[1 

ves 

[] noi 

Reason for Board Action: 

If you disagree with Ine decision of the Board of Review regarding classification, appeal Is made by sending Form 2167 lo the State Tax Commission, P.O. Box 30471, Lansing, Mi. 48909 by June 30. 

4. QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY EXEMPTION 

Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. 

O 

Exemption Request Denied 

I 

Exemption percent modified from 

% To. 

% 

Record of Vote - Board or three member committee of board.

Page 24

EE 

e—————

Dns E¢ Gress 

[1] TTL 

S70 7 wb mA HMEREE PEE 

Etat 3 

| | 

| | 

— 

| 

9589 0710 5370 3111 530

IEEE 

- 

I 

| 

RE

7)

6/

[

PDF reading copy

← View full record