Full record / Winsor - Farm Crest Foods 25-003146 - Answer with Exhibit A - final 10-17-25.pdf

Winsor - Farm Crest Foods 25-003146 - Answer with Exhibit A - final 10-17-25.pdf

Farm Crest Foods, Petitioner V Township Of Winsor, Respondent · 25-003146-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

 

 







 !" 

#

 



$%&



()*(+),-,./.((+.0.123+)4*)5

()6176(.0)+268+17++/+5(,6*19:;.0646+8.<)67;0,;).0+/+5(,6*1

=>>8*7@+,1*ABBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

2CDEFGHIJ)CKLGHMCHENK7GHEODE6HPGQROEFGH

;HFEGP<GSCQHRCHE

2CDEFGHTJ)CKLGHMCHENK.EEGQHCU9.VEWGQFXCM)CLQCKCHEOEFSCNK7GHEODE6HPGQROEFGH

4FQKE1ORC

5A6A

0OKE1ORC

4FQR1ORCYFPOHUZ

5OF[FH\.MMQCKKY1GA]2EQCCE](A*A^G_GQ)VQO[)GVECZ

7FEUGQ,G`H

2EOEC

a6(7GMC

,C[CLWGHC1VRbCQ

+ROF[.MMQCKKYMGHGECHECQVH[CKKUGV`OHE5,,EGKCHMO[[DGQQCKLGHMCHDCSFOCROF[Z

2CDEFGHcJ2VbdCDE(QGLCQEU6HPGQROEFGH

(OQDC[6MCHEFPFDOEFGH1VRbCQJ

.QCEWCLOQDC[K[FKECMbU(CEFEFGHCQDGHEF\VGVKGQOMdGFHFH\e

6PHG][FKEO[[LOQDC[KEWOEOQCOMdGFHFH\FHKCLOQOEC\QGVLFH\KA.EEODWO

2CLOQOECKWCCEFPHCDCKKOQUA

-CK

1G

1GE.LL[FDOb[C

7[OKKFPFDOEFGHGP(QGLCQEUJ

)CO[

(CQKGHO[

YDWCDfGHCZ

.\QFDV[EVQO[

7GRRCQDFO[

6HMVKEQFO[

)CKFMCHEFO[

,FRbCQg7VEGSCQ

8CSC[GLRCHEO[

;EF[FEU

YDWCDfGHCZ

8GCKEWCKVbdCDELQGLCQEUWOSCO(QFHDFLO[)CKFMCHDC+_CRLEFGHGPhijGQRGQCe

-CK

1G

klmnnopqr

stuvwxzw{uv|t}

zw~

€wut‚

ƒx„u…†„}t…v

‡ˆ

q‰lno

Š

Š

Š

Š

‹ŒwwŽŒ‚‚‘’“

prp”„{„•–—s‘Žtqnn

rprm‰rlm‰oqo

w~˜~ŒwwvŒ‚‚™šw

okk›m‰‰‰mnkpmnnœokk›m‰‰‰mnkrmnn

Page 2

 

 







 !" 

#

 



$%&



'()*+,-/012345+-6,789-:;(8*,*<+:933(54

'()*+,-=0>78+:?+)*+,-54@::7(:

A+:**<(*52B(58C:D?(-+(?0

E<()F;<5*5)*+,-38,G3*(?*<+:533(540

H,*+)(,IJ(-+54,IK8+-)+354L(:+?(-)(12(G3*+,-

J(-+54MBN,58?,IL(O+(;

J(-+54MBJ(3*P,IQ8(5:78B

R*<(8

@IB,7)<()F(?S,*<(8T5M,O((2345+-0

@IK(*+*+,-(8+:533(54+-UI8,G5N,58?,IL(O+(;?(-+54V)<()F;<+)<N,58?,IL(O+(;*,,F5)*+,-0

W58)<

>74B

J()(GM(8

A+:**<(?5*(*<(K8+-)+354L(:+?(-)(12(G3*+,-,8X754+I+(?9U8+)74*785412(G3*+,-;5:?(-+(?0

'+U-5*78(YL(Z7+8(?

L(:3,-?(-*,89**,8-(B[97*<,8+\(?L(38(:(-*5*+O(]:'+U-5*78(0

[:[

^_`bcdefgh`ibjkli`mekl`nopfeblqkmrkiqmqbq`e^kstgkb`u`obvnr^wjkli`meiklx`pdfbdykmklz`ljkli`mdyjldj`lb{v||}~€‚ƒ‚‚ƒ„‚wmdikb`pqokonopfeblqkm…`x`mdju`ob

…qeblqibcqb_qo†qoedl^dcoe_qjv_`l`qokyb`l‡b_`jlqukl{jkli`mˆw‰Šdb_efgh`ibjkli`mel`i`qx`pkonr^‹`lbqyqikb`keŒfkmqyq`pqopfeblqkmykiqmqbq`e‰jdoqoydlukbqdokopg`mq`y

|`bqbqdo`lvrklu‹l`ebrddpewdj`lkb`eb_`qopfeblqkmykiqmqbq`edob_`bcdnr^jkli`me‰Ždc`x`l|`bqbqdo`lqeodbb_`dco`ldlm`ee``dyb_`jlqukl{jkli`m‰tibqx`r``p‹dlj‰qe

b_`dco`ldyb_`jlqukl{jkli`m‰^_`l`ydl`|`bqbqdo`luk{odbg`koqob`l`eb`pjklb{efyyqiq`obbdqoxd`b_`^lqgfokm‘ehflqepqibqdoqob_qekjj`km‰

nokppqbqdo|`bqbqdo`l_keyqm`pkj`bqbqdoqob_`’bkb`^ks‹duuqeeqdov‡’^‹ˆwbdl`imkeeqy{b_`jkli`meyldu‡qopfeblqkmˆbd‡kzlqifmbflkmˆ`x`ob_dfz_|`bqbqdo`l_keodbiqb`pko{

m`zkmkfb_dlqb{bdefjjdlbb_kbkonr^|kli`muk{g`imkeeqyq`pke‡kzlqifmbflkm‰ˆrdlyflb_`lidob`sb“`ejdop`ob‘el`ejdoe`ebdb_`’^‹j`bqbqdoekl`qoimfp`pketbbki_u`obtbd

b_qetoec`l‰

nob_qekjj`kmb_`”fm{Šdklpdy“`xq`cjldj`lm{p`oq`p|`bqbqdo`l‘el`Œf`ebydlkŒfkmqyq`pkzlqifmbflkm`s`ujbqdov‡•t–ˆw‰Ž`l`b_`bcdnr^jkli`meikoodbŒfkmqy{ydlk•t–

g`ikfe`b_`{kl`odbp`xdb`pjlquklqm{bdkzlqifmbflkmfe`kep`yqo`pqo—‹˜™š‰™›„‚„‰“kb_`lb_`efgh`ibjkli`meŒfkmqy{ydlkonr^i`lbqyqikb`kopkl`fe`pydliduu`liqkm

ebdlkz`jldi`eeqozpqeblqgfbqdodldb_`liduu`liqkmdlqopfeblqkmjfljde`e‰’``—‹˜„„‰œppvpw‰’j`iqyqikmm{b_`jkli`mekl`nr^jkli`meb_kbidobkqoŒfkmqyq`pqopfeblqkm

ykiqmqbq`eb_kb‡jlquklqm{l`ebdl`l`jmki`dlfjpkb`b_`b`i_odmdz{dydgedm`b`qopfeblqkmjldj`lb{‰ˆ’``l`kb˜k`e’km`enoix’^‹„žš—qi_tjjœ„œšv„žžw‰—dl`

ej`iqyqikmm{do`jkli`midobkqoekmk{`lgklokopb_`db_`ljkli`midobkqoekoqopfeblqkm`zzjldi`eeqozkoppqeblqgfbqdoykiqmqb{‰noefuukl{b_`efgh`ibjkli`mekl`odbp`xdb`p

jlquklqm{bdkzlqifmbflkmfe`kopb_`”fm{Šdklpdy“`xq`cjldj`lm{p`oq`p|`bqbqdo`l‘ekjjmqikbqdoydlk•t–‰

Ÿ

Ÿ

‚ƒ

”fm{ƒ‚ƒ

Page 3

 

 







 !" 

#

 



$%&



'(')*,-.-/0-/12*342-5/1,5*(/16)*25

'*-/4-'(.*)1-7)/4)893(.-,-)7(0*-43.23*(.):);'2-5/('')(.

<==<>?@ABACDB?EFG?C<DBH<EHC=CDI?@CB JK===KCJBKDB>AEH<EJ$<ELFAB?C<DB?@K?

KEAD<?KDB>AEAMNO?@ABACDB?EFG?C<DB&P=AKBAQCBC??@AECNFDK=RB>ANBC?AK?

>>>$JCG@CIKD$I<QS?KT?ECN<EG<D?KG??@AECNFDK=K?UVWXYYUXZW[\$

KC=?@AG<JP=A?AMH<EJ?<]

CG@CIKDKTECNFDK=

[VV$??K>K ?$&KDBCDI&^_ZYY

!$ $<B?K=KC=CDIMMEABB]%`Y\aYa&KDBCDI&^_Z\Z

?@AEKEECAEBb! &AMT&c]

aDM=<<E&a^\W$EKDMCQAEQADFA&KDBCDI&^_Z\[

1defghijk*dlmhindifol4hifpef-iqhrspfghiktABP<DMAD?uCBD<??@AKBBABB<Ev

ABP<DMAD?CB?@AFDC?<HI<QAEDJAD?HC=CDI?@AKDB>AE?<?@APA?C?C<DbC$A$GC?O<E

?<>DB@CPc$

1defghiwk*dlmhindifol(ffhridx8(yfzhrg{dn*dmrdldifpfg|dol4hifpef

-iqhrspfghikABP<DMAD?JFB?NAEAPEABAD?AMNOKDK??<EDAO<EKF?@<EC}AM

EAPEABAD?K?CQAbC$A$&KBBABB<Ec?<HC=AKDKDB>AE?<?@APA?C?C<D$

-;'5*2(/2kH?@AG<D?KG?CDH<EJK?C<DH<EABP<DMAD?RBK??<EDAO<EKF?@<EC}AM

EAPEABAD?K?CQACDG=FMABKDAJKC=KMMEABB&?@AECNFDK=>C==FBA?@K?AJKC=KMMEABB?<

A=AG?E<DCGK==OBAEQAK==HF?FEAM<GFJAD?BCBBFAMNO?@AECNFDK=$EALFAB?NO

ABP<DMAD?RBK??<EDAO<EKF?@<EC}AMEAPEABAD?K?CQA?<<P?<F?<HA=AG?E<DCGBAEQCGA<DGA

KDAJKC=KMMEABBCBPE<QCMAMJFB?NAJKMACD>EC?CDI$

1defghi~k1y€def'rhmdrfx-iqhrspfghik

 'pred‚-ndifgqgepfghi/ysdrkCB??@APKEGA=DFJNAE<H?@APE<PAE?ONACDI

KPPAK=AM$

 (rdfzdmpred‚lehifgƒyhylhrpn€hgigiƒkHJF=?CP=APKEGA=BKEANACDI

KPPAK=AM&CDMCGK?A>@A?@AE?@AOKEAKM„<CDCDIbC$A$&DAT??<AKG@<?@AEc$HK==

PKEGA=BKEAD<?KM„<CDCDI&=CB??@APKEGA=B?@K?KEAKM„<CDCDICDBAPKEK?AIE<FPCDIB$

!BAKBAPKEK?AB@AA?<HPKPAECHDAGABBKEO$

 4‚pllgqgepfghihq'rhmdrfxk@AG…?@AG=KBBCHCGK?C<D<H?@APE<PAE?ONACDI

KPPAK=AM$

 7hdlfzdly€defmrhmdrfxzp|dp'rgiegmp‚*dlgndied)†dsmfghihq‡ˆ‰ hr

shrdkDMCGK?A>@A?@AE?@APE<PAE?O@KMKPECDGCPK=EABCMADGAATAJP?C<D<HU\Š

<EJ<EA‹ŒŽ‘’ŽŽ“Ž”Ž”‹Œ•’–—”˜‘$

Page 4

 

 







 !" 

#

 



$%&



'()*+,-/012345+-6,789(:3,-:(*,*;+:<33(540=>?@ABCDBEFG@G>HBGI>JABJCKG

FJGLB=C>CDBFIIBFMFJAFJNJBOBGGF=NBPIMFJFC@>JQ@$B$&RGBCH>=CDCDBHFOCGSI>J

LD@ODN>S=BMN@JABHBJGB>HCD@GTFCCB=UV$

'()*+,-W0X78+:Y+)*+,-54Z::7(:0

[ \+:**;(*52](58^:_Y(-+(Y0@GCCDBNBF=QGVABJ@BAENCDBABJ@FMA>OSTBJC$

[ `;()ab;5*5)*+,-38,c3*(Y*;+:533(540JA@OFCBLDFCA>OSTBJC>=FOC@>J

>OOS==BAC>OFSGBBC@C@>JB=C>FIIBFM$DBOd>JMN>JB$

[ Ze],7);()af,*;(80gBGO=@EBCDBFOC@>JLD@ODI=>TICBACD@GFIIBFM$!GBF

GBIF=FCBGDBBC>HIFIB=&@HJBOBGGF=N$

[ Zeh(*+*+,-(8+:533(54+-ie8,c 5j,58Y,e9(k+(bY(-+540JA@OFCBLD@OD

%>F=A>HB?@BLC>>dFOC@>JFJA@JA@OFCBCDBAFCBCDB%>F=AKGABJ@FMJ>C@OBLFG

TF@MBAC>BC@C@>JB=$

[ \+:**;(Y5*(*;(h8+-)+3549(:+Y(-)(12(c3*+,-,8l754+e+(Y<i8+)74*7854

12(c3*+,-b5:Y(-+(Y0=>?@ABCDBAFCBM@GCBA>JCDBABJ@FM$

'+i-5*78(0G@mJFCS=BENBGI>JABJCKGFCC>=JBN>=FSCD>=@nBA=BI=BGBJCFC@?B@G

=BoS@=BA$

91pZqr19'0

">STSGCGSET@CCDBstuvuwxyz|s}~y€z‚uvwxw‚ƒt„st}C>CDB=@ESJFM$">S

GD>SMAFMG>dBBIFO>INH>=N>S=GBMH$

DB=@ESJFML@MM@GGSBF>C@OB>H@M@JmFHCB=FJFJGLB=@GH@MBAFJA@JA@OFCBCDBOFGB@G

=BFANH>=CDBGODBASM@Jm>HFDBF=@Jm$

DB=@ESJFML@MMGBJAFJ>C@OB>HDBF=@JmC>CDBIF=C@BGJ>MBGGCDFJ…†AFNG@JFA?FJOB

>HCDBDBF=@Jm$

>ODBOdCDBGCFCSG>HN>S=FIIBFM&?@G@C>S=LBEG@CBFCLLL$T@OD@mFJ$m>?‡CFPC=@EFJA

OM@Od>JCDBR>OdBC BF=ODU>IC@>J$

Page 5

EXHIBIT A TO ANSWER FILED IN MTT 25-003146

Page 6

4908-4490-5817, v. 2 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 

STATE TAX COMMISSION 

 

 

Petitioner: Farm Crest Foods 

 

 

 

 

Petition No. 25-041 

Parcel ID: 28-999-026-00 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Year: 2025 

 

Taxing Unit: Winsor Township 

Assessor: Clay Kelterborn 

________________________________/ 

 

Assessor Response to Petition For Change of Property Classification 

 

1. The Subject Property in this classification appeal is one of two IFT parcels that have been 

carved out of a larger parcel of real property located at 6761 Haist Rd, Pigeon, MI 48755 

(PPN: 28-025-005-10). These two IFT Parcels are depicted on Exhibit A, an attached aerial 

photograph with arrows identifying where each IFT parcel is located. The Subject Property 

is the IFT – “Layer Barn” parcel. An engineering drawing of the facilities on each IFT 

parcel is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

2. Winsor Township (“the Township”) is the taxing authority for the Subject Property, and 

Clay Kelterborn serves as the Winsor Township Assessor. 

 

3. The Subject Property is located in an Industrial Development District that the Township 

created. (See Exhibit 2 to Petitioner’s Petition). 

 

4. In January 2020, Petitioner applied for an IFT Certificate for the Subject Property pursuant 

to the provisions of the Industrial Facilities Tax Act (“IFTA”), MCL 207.551 et seq. (See 

Petition Exhibit 2). 

 

5. Under the IFTA, only “qualified facilities” are eligible for an IFT Certificate and “qualified 

facilities” are industrial properties that “create, maintain, or prevent loss of employment 

and must primarily restore, replace, or update the technology of obsolete industrial 

property.” Great Lakes Sales, Inc v State Tax Comm’n, 194 Mich App 271, 274; 486 NW2d 

367 (1992); see also MCL 207.558(2). 

 

6. Here, the State Tax Commission (“STC”) granted Petitioner’s application for an IFT 

Certificate and the Subject Property is a qualified industrial facility that receives tax 

benefits from the IFT Certificate (IFT Certificate # 2020-016). 

 

7. Petitioner filed this classification appeal to reclassify the IFT Parcel from “industrial” to 

“agricultural,” presumably to benefit from the qualified agricultural exemption (“QAE”). 

 

8. Petitioner’s Petition should be denied because Petitioner has failed to cite any legal 

authority supporting the proposition that a parcel currently subject to an IFT certificate may

Page 7

4908-4490-5817, v. 2

be reclassified as agricultural and simultaneously qualify for the QAE. While Petitioner 

concedes that the IFT Certificate should be rescinded (see Petition’s Statement in Support 

of Petition at ¶ 27), Petitioner has not taken the necessary procedural steps to do so. Instead, 

Petitioner is improperly attempting to pursue reclassification without first obtaining 

rescission of the IFT Certificate—effectively placing the cart before the horse. 

9. Importantly, Petitioner has the burden of proof in this classification appeal. See CVS

Caremark v State Tax Comm'n, 306 Mich App 58, 65; 856 NW2d 79 (2014) (noting that

“[a]lthough MCL 211.34c(6) does not expressly say so, petitioner had the burden to prove

that the assessor improperly classified its property. . . .”).

10. Petitioner has not met its burden to prove that the subject property, an IFT Parcel, is

improperly classified. Petitioner fails to cite any legal authority supporting the proposition

that a parcel currently subject to an IFT certificate may be reclassified as agricultural and

simultaneously qualify for the QAE. Therefore, Petitioner has failed to prove that the

Township Assessor improperly classified the subject property for the 2025 tax year.

WHEREFORE, the Township Assessor respectfully requests that the State Tax

Commission deny Petitioner’s Petition for reclassification. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Clay Kelterborn 

Winsor Township Assessor

Page 8

EXHIBIT A

Page 9

2C8RC 

ERCE 

Co aT 

Le~® 

IIE 

€« 

C 

MM 

23 

earth.google.com 

83 

| 

[HE selfHelp ProductS.. 

[Bl WebSoilSuvey 

2 Municipal Directory... 

A FetchGIS 

Laredo Anywhere 

 § 

Misuite 

- Continuin.. 

 @ Adobe Acrobat 

[5 INSPECTIONS NOT... 

2017 IFT 

— Part of Egg 

> 

Processing Plant 

Q 

vw 

m® 

XX 

© 

v 

EERE 

2020 IFT — Layer Bam 

28-999-026-00 

I 

pa 

Data attribution 

4/4/2025

Page 10

EXHIBIT B

Page 11

PUMPING 

STATION 

FOR UNDERGRQUND 

PUMPING SYSTEM 

FROM ALL 

CUAALE 

DRAINS INDICATED AS Seal 

CLAN 

VIEW 

tow To 

Se 

ee 

-- 

#BEESUBIGEON. 

RIVER = 

- 

~ 

AHAIST RD 

- 

= 

RE 

AE TR 

BELT 

: 

7 

| 

SEPTIC 

— 

EGG 

CONCRETE PAD — 

PROCESSING PLANT 

| 

| 

FIELD 

FOR LOADING DOCK 

| 

BLOG 

(1064) 

| 

| 

mmm 

of [EEL 

OME 

SECURITY’ 

= DRY STORAGE 

nl 

OFFICE 

_eate L ENE 

5 roiblei—— CLUE 

6 

fr 

Ho 

1 

UTILITY | [8 

| 

BLDG 36A: 

83% 

Fil 

| 

UTILITY 

STORAGE 

| 

3 

WATER 

_\B CONCRETE 

WALL THEN WOOD FRAME 

21; 

| 

SHED 

Sr — 

me om 

om 

me me 

me mm om 

em 

= em men oe 

— 

1 

| 

LAYERS 

LDG 

5 Miz —wELL #37 

| {1084 

LENGTH $444’ 

WIDTH? 70" 

20 

HE 

teens 

: 

TTL 

Sepzem 

ET 

eo [TI 

= 

eg 

pal 

i 

al 

| 

L 

= 

AYERS 

BLDG 

37. ( 

| 

lb. 

OH. 

| LENGTH:440” 

WIDTH: 607 

fiodhn]; 

E—-—p— Sp 

— 

BL 

i 

GENERATOR- 

2 —WELL #38 

ani 

(ENGTH:AZ 

SIDE WALL 367 

rl 

| 

3 

Zg5¢ LAYERS BLDG ig 

VIEW 

| [WIDTH: 61=9,5", 

 PEAKAD 

I 

a 

Ts 

rrr ees tr esse @ 

lh 

eONVEYDR 

[1 

UNDER CANOPY 

NEW (2015) 

| 

n 

ET 

FABRIC ROOF 

| 

Al 

ke 

MANURE 

TN (EL re A 

it 

STORAGE 

| 

oe 

i 

| 

STRUCTURE 

727X576." 

ch 

| 

Ml 

SIDE WALL®2 5 

LAYERS 

NO 

BLDG 

4 

OH 

LENGTHE467" WIDTH: 64" 

(6019) 

EOR 

= [TGENERATOR 

ALL? 

307 

SIDE 

W 

Lh 3 

SCALE : 

® SURFACE DRAIN 

INLET 

© PROCESSING 

PLANT 

WASTE WATER 

NERAS AN 580 

STORAGE 

LAGOON 

RS 

LENGTH: 430 

WIDTH: 56 

L, 

— GRAVEL DRIVE ——= 

~ — 

I 

INCH 

EQUALS 

[00 FEET 

(DATE)=> DATE 

OF 

CONSTRUCTION 

CONCRETE 

FLOOR INALL 

BUILDINGS 

BROCKWAY TECHNICAL 

SERVICES 

— FARM CREST 

FOODS— 

EGG 

LAYING 

anp 

PROCESSING 

FACILITY 

6761 

HAIST 

RD. 

PIGEON, MICHIGAN 

NicHoLAs J MARINICH, PE, 

DRAWN & APPROVED 

BY : Z7.7 

SHEET 

| 

| FEZ019 PIGEON, MICHIGAN [OF 2

Page 12

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 

STATE TAX COMMISSION 

 

 

Petitioner: Farm Crest Foods 

 

 

 

 

Petition No. 25-042 

Parcel ID: 28-999-021-00 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Year: 2025 

 

Taxing Unit: Winsor Township 

Assessor: Clay Kelterborn 

________________________________/ 

 

Assessor Response to Petition For Change of Property Classification 

 

1. The Subject Property in this classification appeal is one of two IFT parcels that have been 

carved out of a larger parcel of real property located at 6761 Haist Rd, Pigeon, MI 48755 

(PPN: 28-025-005-10). These two IFT Parcels are depicted on Exhibit A, an aerial 

photograph identifying the location of each IFT parcel. The Subject Property is the IFT – 

parcel labeled “2017 IFT -Part of Egg Processing Plant.” An engineering drawing of the 

facilities located on both IFT parcels is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

2. Winsor Township (“the Township”) is the taxing authority for the Subject Property, and 

Clay Kelterborn serves as the Winsor Township Assessor. 

 

3. The Subject Property is located in an Industrial Development District that the Township 

created. (See Petitioner’s Petition Exhibit 2). 

 

4. In September 2017, Petitioner applied for an IFT Certificate for the Subject Property 

pursuant to the provisions of the Industrial Facilities Tax Act (“IFTA”), MCL 207.551 et 

seq. (See Petition Exhibit 2). 

 

5. Under the IFTA, only “qualified facilities” are eligible for an IFT Certificate and “qualified 

facilities” are industrial properties that “create, maintain, or prevent loss of employment 

and must primarily restore, replace, or update the technology of obsolete industrial 

property.” Great Lakes Sales, Inc v State Tax Comm’n, 194 Mich App 271, 274; 486 NW2d 

367 (1992); see also MCL 207.558(2). 

 

6. The State Tax Commission (“STC”) granted Petitioner’s application for an IFT Certificate 

and the Subject Property is a qualified industrial facility that receives tax benefits from the 

IFT Certificate (IFT Certificate #2017-214). 

 

7. Petitioner filed this classification appeal to reclassify the IFT Parcel from “industrial” to 

“agricultural,” presumably to benefit from the qualified agricultural exemption (“QAE”). 

 

8. Petitioner’s Petition should be denied because Petitioner has failed to cite any legal 

authority supporting the proposition that a parcel currently subject to an IFT certificate may

Page 13

2 

 

4930-9907-5931, v. 1 

be reclassified as agricultural and simultaneously qualify for the QAE. While Petitioner 

concedes that the IFT Certificate should be rescinded (see Petition’s Statement in Support 

of Petition at ¶ 27), Petitioner has not taken the necessary procedural steps to do so. Instead, 

Petitioner is improperly attempting to pursue reclassification without first obtaining 

rescission of the IFT Certificate—effectively placing the cart before the horse. 

 

9. Importantly, Petitioner has the burden of proof in this classification appeal. See CVS 

Caremark v State Tax Comm'n, 306 Mich App 58, 65; 856 NW2d 79 (2014) (noting that 

“[a]lthough MCL 211.34c(6) does not expressly say so, petitioner had the burden to prove 

that the assessor improperly classified its property. . . .”). 

 

10. Petitioner has not met its burden to prove that the subject property, an IFT Parcel, is 

improperly classified. Petitioner fails to cite any legal authority supporting the proposition 

that a parcel currently subject to an IFT certificate may be reclassified as agricultural and 

simultaneously qualify for the QAE. Therefore, Petitioner has failed to prove that the 

Township Assessor improperly classified the subject property for the 2025 tax year. 

WHEREFORE, the Township Assessor respectfully requests that the State Tax 

Commission deny Petitioner’s Petition for reclassification. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Clay Kelterborn 

Winsor Township Assessor

Page 14

EXHIBIT A

Page 15

2C8RC 

ERCE 

Co aT 

Le~® 

IIE 

€« 

C 

MM 

23 

earth.google.com 

83 

| 

[HE selfHelp ProductS.. 

[Bl WebSoilSuvey 

2 Municipal Directory... 

A FetchGIS 

Laredo Anywhere 

 § 

Misuite 

- Continuin.. 

 @ Adobe Acrobat 

[5 INSPECTIONS NOT... 

2017 IFT 

— Part of Egg 

> 

Processing Plant 

Q 

vw 

m® 

XX 

© 

v 

EERE 

2020 IFT — Layer Bam 

28-999-026-00 

I 

pa 

Data attribution 

4/4/2025

Page 16

EXHIBIT B

Page 17

PUMPING 

STATION 

FOR UNDERGRQUND 

PUMPING SYSTEM 

FROM ALL 

CUAALE 

DRAINS INDICATED AS Seal 

CLAN 

VIEW 

tow To 

Se 

ee 

-- 

#BEESUBIGEON. 

RIVER = 

- 

~ 

AHAIST RD 

- 

= 

RE 

AE TR 

BELT 

: 

7 

| 

SEPTIC 

— 

EGG 

CONCRETE PAD — 

PROCESSING PLANT 

| 

| 

FIELD 

FOR LOADING DOCK 

| 

BLOG 

(1064) 

| 

| 

mmm 

of [EEL 

OME 

SECURITY’ 

= DRY STORAGE 

nl 

OFFICE 

_eate L ENE 

5 roiblei—— CLUE 

6 

fr 

Ho 

1 

UTILITY | [8 

| 

BLDG 36A: 

83% 

Fil 

| 

UTILITY 

STORAGE 

| 

3 

WATER 

_\B CONCRETE 

WALL THEN WOOD FRAME 

21; 

| 

SHED 

Sr — 

me om 

om 

me me 

me mm om 

em 

= em men oe 

— 

1 

| 

LAYERS 

LDG 

5 Miz —wELL #37 

| {1084 

LENGTH $444’ 

WIDTH? 70" 

20 

HE 

teens 

: 

TTL 

Sepzem 

ET 

eo [TI 

= 

eg 

pal 

i 

al 

| 

L 

= 

AYERS 

BLDG 

37. ( 

| 

lb. 

OH. 

| LENGTH:440” 

WIDTH: 607 

fiodhn]; 

E—-—p— Sp 

— 

BL 

i 

GENERATOR- 

2 —WELL #38 

ani 

(ENGTH:AZ 

SIDE WALL 367 

rl 

| 

3 

Zg5¢ LAYERS BLDG ig 

VIEW 

| [WIDTH: 61=9,5", 

 PEAKAD 

I 

a 

Ts 

rrr ees tr esse @ 

lh 

eONVEYDR 

[1 

UNDER CANOPY 

NEW (2015) 

| 

n 

ET 

FABRIC ROOF 

| 

Al 

ke 

MANURE 

TN (EL re A 

it 

STORAGE 

| 

oe 

i 

| 

STRUCTURE 

727X576." 

ch 

| 

Ml 

SIDE WALL®2 5 

LAYERS 

NO 

BLDG 

4 

OH 

LENGTHE467" WIDTH: 64" 

(6019) 

EOR 

= [TGENERATOR 

ALL? 

307 

SIDE 

W 

Lh 3 

SCALE : 

® SURFACE DRAIN 

INLET 

© PROCESSING 

PLANT 

WASTE WATER 

NERAS AN 580 

STORAGE 

LAGOON 

RS 

LENGTH: 430 

WIDTH: 56 

L, 

— GRAVEL DRIVE ——= 

~ — 

I 

INCH 

EQUALS 

[00 FEET 

(DATE)=> DATE 

OF 

CONSTRUCTION 

CONCRETE 

FLOOR INALL 

BUILDINGS 

BROCKWAY TECHNICAL 

SERVICES 

— FARM CREST 

FOODS— 

EGG 

LAYING 

anp 

PROCESSING 

FACILITY 

6761 

HAIST 

RD. 

PIGEON, MICHIGAN 

NicHoLAs J MARINICH, PE, 

DRAWN & APPROVED 

BY : Z7.7 

SHEET 

| 

| FEZ019 PIGEON, MICHIGAN [OF 2

Page 18

{06939-001-00161453.1} 

1 

4917-4623-0900, v. 1

 STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

FARM CREST FOODS, 

Petitioner, 

v 

CITY OF KENTWOOD, 

Respondent. 

MTT Docket No. 25-003146-TT 

Parcel Nos. 3228-999-021-00;

 

 3228-999-026-00

/ 

Ryan M. Shannon (P74535) 

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLC 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

123 W. Allegan Street, Suite 900 

Lansing, MI 48933 

(517) 371-1730

rshannon@dickinsonwright.com

Toby Koenig (P72367) 

BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC 

Attorneys for Respondent 

161 Ottawa Ave NW, Suite 400 

Grand Rapids, MI 49503 

(616) 965-9343

toby@bloomsluggett.com

/ 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Tonya Voakes, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is employed by Bloom 

Sluggett, PC, and that on October 17, 2025, she served a copy of Respondent’s Answer to 

Petitioner’s Property Tax Appeal by U.S. First Class mail and electronic mail upon: 

Ryan M. Shannon 

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLC 

123 W. Allegan Street, Suite 900 

Lansing, MI 48933 

rshannon@dickinsonwright.com 

/s/ Tonya Voakes 

 Tonya Voakes

PDF reading copy

← View full record