Full record / scpetition_classification.pdf

scpetition_classification.pdf

Jason Taylor Petitioner V City Of Detroit Respondent · 26-002516-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

1 of 3

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Petitioner’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Individual

Local Unit of Government:

First Name

Jason

M.I.

Last Name

Taylor

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

5250 Courville St.

City or Town

Detroit

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48224

Telephone Number

(313) 221-4753

E-mail Address

magnetictaylor@gmail.com

Subject Property Information:

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If 

no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

N/A 

Property Address (No., Street, City, St, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

5550-52 Lakeview St.

Detroit Michigan 48213

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Wayne County (WAYNE)

County

Wayne

Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:

Jason Taylor

5250 Courville St.

Detroit, MI, 48224

313-221-4753

magnetictaylor@gmail.com 

Date: 06/26/2026

 Michigan Tax Tribunal

RE: Formal Dispute of Tax Adjustment

Parcel Number: 21052388

Property Address: 5550-52 Lakeview St.

Detroit, MI 48213

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

2 of 3

To the Detroit Board of Review,

I am formally appealing the taxable value uncapping and resulting assessment for the above-referenced property for tax years 2023, 2024, and 2025.

I purchased this property through the Wayne County Treasurer’s Auction in November 2022. At the time of purchase, the property was in severely distressed and 

uninhabitable condition. The condition included, but was not limited to: missing windows, lack of plumbing, no functional heating system, broken porch structure, 

absence of bathroom fixtures (tubs and sinks), deteriorated flooring, and significant overall structural and livability deficiencies.

While I understand that a transfer of ownership may trigger uncapping under Michigan law, the resulting Taxable Value must still be based on the property’s 

**True Cash Value (market value)** as of the date of transfer. In this case, I believe the assessed value significantly exceeds the actual market value of the 

property in its “as-is” condition at the time of purchase.

Under Michigan property tax law, assessments must reflect the price that the property would sell for on the open market, taking into account its existing 

condition. A severely distressed property—such as this one—cannot reasonably be valued using comparable sales of updated or habitable homes without 

appropriate downward adjustments. Any failure to properly account for the property’s physical condition results in an inflated assessment that is inconsistent 

with fair market value standards.

Given the extent of disrepair at the time of purchase, the auction purchase price is a strong indicator of the property’s true cash value. Therefore, I respectfully 

request that the Board consider the purchase price, along with supporting documentation, as the primary basis for determining the correct assessed value.

Additionally, I request clarification and supporting documentation regarding the following:

- The methodology used to determine the property’s assessed value after uncapping 

- Comparable sales used in the valuation analysis 

- Any adjustments made (or not made) for condition, vacancy, or structural deficiencies 

- A year-by-year breakdown of how the taxable value was calculated for 2023, 2024, and 2025 

Based on these concerns, I respectfully request:

1. A reduction in the assessed and taxable value to reflect the accurate true cash value of the property at the time of transfer 

2. A reassessment that properly accounts for the property’s distressed condition 

3. Full supporting documentation used in determining the current valuation 

I am currently in the process of rehabilitating this property to make it suitable housing for my family. However, the assessment at issue does not reflect its 

condition at the relevant valuation date and places an undue financial burden based on an inflated value.

I appreciate the Board’s time and consideration of this appeal and am prepared to provide any additional documentation needed.

Sincerely, 

Jason Taylor

Jurisdictional Issues:

Did you protest the classification at the March Board of Review? No

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

3 of 3

If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

Other, please explain

Explanation: The bill just came in the mail June 16, 2026.

Year(s) Under Appeal:

2023, 2024, 2025

Classification Information:

Parcel Identification Number:

21052388

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: Personal (check one)

 Residential (check one)

What do you believe is the property’s classification? Personal (check one)

 Residential (check one)

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

House is still being renovated

 

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Trying to fix up to help out with veteran homes.

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner’s Signature: 

/s/ Jason Taylor

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/ 

Fee Information:

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for 

the filing of this appeal.

A fee of $75.00 is required for the filing of a classification appeal.

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

PDF reading copy

← View full record