Full record / 2515 Riopelle Answer.pdf

2515 Riopelle Answer.pdf

2515 Riopelle, LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Detroit Respondent · 26-001559-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

1 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

2515 RIOPELLE, LLC 

A Michigan limited liability company 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

v 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26-001559-MTT 

a municipal corporation 

 

 

 

Parcel No. 07000823.004 

 

Respondent. 

________________________________________________________________________________/ 

ANSWER TO PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 Respondent, City of Detroit, by and through it undersigned counsel and for its Answer to this 

Petition states the following: 

1. Respondent, City of Detroit, neither admits nor denies as Respondent lacks sufficient 

knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation and leaves 

Petitioner to its proofs. 

2. Respondent admits as true. 

3. Respondent admits as true. 

4. Respondent denies Petitioner’s contentions of value are correct or accurate. 

5. Based solely upon Petitioner’s unsubstantiated contentions of value, Respondent admits. 

6. Respondent admits as true. 

7. Respondent admits that this is a proper recitation of MCL 205.735a(6).

Page 2

2 

 

8. Respondent, City of Detroit, neither admits nor denies as Respondent lacks sufficient 

knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation and leaves 

Petitioner to its proofs. Respondent reserves the right to assert additional responses if 

Petitioner subsequently raises issues of “additions” or “losses”. 

9. Respondent admits this appeal involves issues of true cash and taxable values imposed 

upon the Subject Property, but states that these allegations lack merit. 

10. Respondent, City of Detroit, neither admits nor denies as Respondent lacks sufficient 

knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation and leaves 

Petitioner to its proofs. 

Wherefore, Respondent respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal dismiss the 

Petition in this matter and award attorney fees and costs to Respondent. 

Dated: 10/6/2026 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Mary Beth Cobbs 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By: Mary Beth Cobbs ( P40080) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin C. Richard ( P 43417) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City of Detroit Law Department 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Woodward Ave., Ste. 500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Detroit, MI 48226 

 (313) 237-3075 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. 

 

 

NOW COMES Respondent, City of Detroit, and asserts the following Affirmative 

Defenses to the Petitioner’s claims: 

1. 

Petitioner lacks standing and/or capacity to bring forth this Petition. 

2. 

Petitioner’s claims may be barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

Page 3

3 

 

3. 

This Tribunal lacks subject matter jurisdiction. 

 

4. 

Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

5. Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of appraising its property failed 

to conform with the mode and method of appraising its property failed to conform with the mode 

and method applied in the case of all other properties in the community for the year in question. 

Wherefore, Respondent respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal dismiss the 

Petition in this matter and award attorney fees and costs to Respondent. 

Dated: 10/6/2025 

/s/Mary Beth Cobbs 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By: Mary Beth Cobbs ( P40080) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin C. Richard ( P43417) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City of Detroit Law Department 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Woodward Ave., Ste. 500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Detroit, MI 48226 

 

 

 

 

 

 

313.237.3075 

 

 

 

 

 

 

cobbm@detroitmi.gov

Page 4

4 

 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

2515 RIOPELLE, LLC 

A Michigan limited liability company 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

v 

CITY OF DETROIT, 

 

 

 

Docket No. 26-001559-MTT 

a municipal corporation 

 

 

 

Parcel No. 07000823.004 

 

Respondent.

 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

On 10/6/202, I mailed by first class mail a copy of Respondent’s Answer and Affirmative 

Defenses to: 

 

 

 

DAWDA PLC 

Christopher R. Martella 

Adam J. Salomon 

39533 Woodward Avenue, Suite 200 

Bloomfield Hill, MI 48304-5103 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I declare that the above statement is true to the best of my information, knowledge, and 

belief. 

 

Dated: October 6, 2026 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Mary Beth Cobbs 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mary Beth Cobbs ( P40080) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

City of Detroit Law Department 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Woodward Ave., Ste. 500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Detroit, MI 48226

PDF reading copy

← View full record