26-000200.pdf
Andrew Nesbitt, Petitioner V Township Of Porter, Respondent · 26-000200-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
" “CEIVED
MAR 26 2026
Mi tuGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I, BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
:
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Andrew Nesbitt
,
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Petitioner(s)
v
MTT Docket No, 26-000200
Parter Township
Respondent(s)
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
1.
1 wish this Tribunal to reconsider Nesbitt
-
Porter
2. Good cause exists to grant reconsideration because:
{ feel our previous township assessor {she was terminated from the township in March 2024 due to tack of
(ransparency, and some integrity issues. She also lost her license and was working under her sons
license who the township hired after she lost hers)assigneda taxable value to high to my property and to
low tothe property and house that was removed after a combination for the 2023 tax year. According to
surrounding similiar parcels my taxble value per acre is almost 50% higher. This is Ag land that has been
in the family for 60 plus years.
| fee! the taxable value is way out of line.
iq;
hl
i
(sign here)
Andrew G
Nesbitt
[Print/type name of person signing]
I certify that on this date
| served a copy of this Motion, and/a
y additional documentation, on the
opposing party or their representative.
20) Move 206
1,
Date
(sigp/hdre)/Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Andrew Nesbitt, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Vv MTT Docket No. 26-000200 Township Of Porter, Respondent. NOTICE OF NO ACTION TAKE NOTICE that the Tribunal has received Motion For Reconsideration (“document”). You were, however, required to file proof demonstrating the service of that document on the opposing party (“proof of service”) and no proof of service has been filed. As such, the document is not properly pending and no action will be taken unless the required proof of service is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this notice. If the required proof of service is not filed within 14 days, you will be required to re-file the document with the appropriate filing fee and proof that the re-filed document was served on the opposing party. Entered: March 19, 2026 By: Tribunal Clerk PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
bv Gmail Andrew Nesbitt <ihredguy@gmail.com> 80-16-016-001-10 1 message Andrew Nesbitt <ihredguy@gmail.com> Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 11:17 AM To: Assessor@portertwpvbco.gov motion for reconsideration proof of service Thanks Andy m everything sent to MTT 260316.pdf 9767K
Page 4
rom Puede 2 %ive 35050 GLTh lh Mexeellis MT yo SAN pa neodd Ready[Jost "Document Mailer =m mm OFTHE RET URN ADDRESS, FOLD AT DoT CERTIFIED MAIL" IN 7022 0410 ooo: 882k 3703 = umirep stares POSTAL SERVICES RDC 99 To: M TT Pol2ox 20232 Lensivg MT yaY1%) Retail 48909
Page 5
sdsn 2) 9207 0 7 VW G0-80 'V'S'N IHL NI 3aViN YBa sras | 3 ©32IAI3S [B1SOd SSIES PANN OF | 92 I | | onli i G906¥ I | fl rom H aIvd 39v adojenuz 6X .9 °ADINYIS TVLSOd JB 90000e€6 STIVISTILINIT ==